Preview

Dog Whistle Politics: Annotated Bibliography

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
225 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dog Whistle Politics: Annotated Bibliography
This month I read Dog Whistle Politics a nonfiction book by Ian Haney López. This book is about the “secret” language politicians use to be racist. I loved this book very much for it’s deep, intellectual meaning. I would rate this book a 9 out of 10 because of its extremely important meaning in society today. I would recommend it to anyone who is looking for a book about politics with a high level vocabulary.
What does it say? Ian Haney Lopez’s book Dog Whistle Politics Lopez discusses the common phase “dog whistle politics” that refers to the idea of politicians using political phrases that mean one thing to a certain group, but have a second meaning for a smaller target group. Lopez focuses on using dog whistle politics to attract people’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I would recommend this book. Especially if you like historical fiction, this book would be great for…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The F Word” by Firoozeh Dumas and “Peeling Bananas” by Wendy Lee, tell stories on their encounter on migrating from their previous homes. They are both faced and challenged with negativity.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Described as being painfully stupid and incapable to create a thought of his own, Tom Parsons is a character that modern society would call a slave to propaganda. During the story 1984, Winston informed the reader of Parsons' undying devotion to Big Brother. Moreover, considered to be one of the most brainwashed characters in 1984. Parsons' indoctrination was demonstrated in the instance where his children relinquish him to the Ministry of Love for committing a thoughtcrime. Nevertheless, many considered it to be act Parsons could not have been capable of committing solely because of his inability to conjure up a thought that was not laced with Inner Party propaganda.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    And how!- This phrase is used to show that an individual is agreeing with someone else…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, by Doris Kearns Goodwin HEATHER COX RICHARDSON…

    • 2089 Words
    • 60 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: Lincoln Steffens published the “shame of the cities” witch was a book based on the corruption in the 1900’s. By 1900, many cities in the south of America were controlled by political machines. These organizations consisted of full-time politicians whose main goal was to get and keep politicians power and money and also influence that went into it.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics of Anger is the first essay. It goes in to detail about George Wallace and how he used race as a way to gain voters. George Wallace was a very racist man, behind closed doors that is. George Wallace’s inaugural address show how racist he was because of his famous line, “Segregation now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!” George Wallace insists that it was symbolic meaning, “State now! State tomorrow! State forever!”, but he was not fooling anyone. The book state that his campaign adopted a kind of soft porn racism in which fear and hatred could be mobilized without mentioning race itself. He was a racist person but chose not to show it to the public, by doing this along with supporting segregation using state power as a cover story he gained the trust of the people.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Make America Great Again, Hillary for America, and A Future to Believe In, but what do these campaign slogans mean? Are they supposed to have a fixed meaning at all? Over the years as the political process has evolved politics have also become a key platform for narrative creation. Consequently, that creation of narratives may also be problematic because these campaign slogans and or sound bites, which will be discussed further into this series. The truthis that a text does not have a fixed meaning, as much as rhetorical critics would attempt to argue ideology is no longer a set of ideas and beliefs of a group or political party as the Merriam Webster dictionary suggest. Additionally, that definition has changed quite dramatically to mean the interpretation of ideals and beliefs of a group or political party key word there being ‘Interpretation.’And campaign managers know that and use that to their advantage. “Make America Great Again,” it purposely is open ended so that ideological narrative creation can take place. What does it mean? That’s just it, it could mean any amount of things to Trumps supporters, and however, the problem is that the rhetorical significance of these monikers is much less important than the idea of a great America. Politicians use these types of persuasive tactics by using an authority figures ethos or popularity and ability to speak.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Migra Mouse Book Report

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Migra Mouse: Political Cartoons on Immigration is a book written by Lalo Alcaraz which encompasses his interesting opinions on immigration and America’s view of Latin Americans. Alcaraz attacks racists, politicians, and American society throughout his book, Migra Mouse: Political Cartoons on Immigration, and does a pretty good job of it too. Alcaraz’s book is certainly worth reading because it offers a new, fresh way to look at the ever-so perplexing topic of immigration.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Doublespeak is the ability to use vague truths and positive deflecting language to redirect a person’s opinion or view on a potentially caustic issue. While not an actual act of lying, doublespeak is structured in such a way that it subconsciously nudges us to accept a more positive form of reality as truth, even if a clearly adverse topic is being presented or confirmed. The structure of doublespeak is enthusiastically circular; it never allows direct confirmation of an undesirable condition or event, yet proposes a more palatable outlook on the topic in question. Careful verbiage is used to discourage the ingesting of a topic in an undesirable interpretation, and to afford the audience more promising descriptions and thought processes to consume instead. Professor Lutz maintains that the doublespeak words actually manifest themselves as the perceived reality, thus softening the blow of a negative situation with optimistic language and careful inflection. A string of positive words is a lot easier to objectify and accept as truth than the actual act of a catastrophe or other harmful action. / For one to refer to their self as democratic, he or she has to believe in the fundamental ideology behind democracy. Government transparency and absolute power…

    • 724 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has struggled with the question of how to preserve an appropriate political atmosphere of religion and government. The current democratic process has not changed as Presidential candidates try to balance both the political and religious landscapes. Jeffrey Tulis contends in “The Rhetorical Presidency” that the original constitution set up institutions to prohibit presidential speech to promote deliberation among the people. As well as, the legislative branch’s design to have elected representatives representing the people of their local districts and states in Washington, D.C. However, Woodrow Wilson increased rhetoric to the masses in an effort to influence public opinion. Presidents using this type of rhetoric do not desire…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political power of words lies not primarily in their form – that is, in speech – or even in the meanings of the words they are directly linked to, but in the totality of brain circuitry that activation can spread to: the frames, metaphors, prototypes, metonymies, and the entire system of concepts. Words matter. They shape our politics – and our lives.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regulate Political Speech

    • 2609 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Over the course of the past twenty years, the U.S. Supreme Court constantly increased constitutional protection of corporate speech under the First Amendment and repeatedly struck down regulations on commercial speech as violating the First Amendment. Although the Supreme Court recently held statutory restrictions on corporate expenditures for electioneering communications to violate the right to free speech, it is still controversially discussed whether such restrictions can be upheld under the First Amendment. However, supporters of such restrictions ignore that the First Amendment is written in terms of speech and not of…

    • 2609 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book, Piers Plowman, is filled with allegorical figures that teach the readers morals and instruct us on the ideal ways of living. The strategies that the author, William Langland, uses to teach us these morals and values vary considerably. In the first chapter, or Passus I, Langland describes an allegorical figure to tell us about the concept of truth. In the poem, The Last election, the author, John Haines, also uses strategies to describe to us the concept of truth.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blackmail in Politics

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The story is called “Blackmail in Politics”, and I immediately understood the essence of this story. The story is about politicians and the blackmail in politics. The main characters are: James Howden, Margaret Howden, Harvey Warrender, and Brian Richardson. James Howden was the Prime Minister of Canada. All his life he dreamed of becoming Prime Minister and yet has achieved his goal, but not in the best way. For the sake of his dreams, he made a deal that could ruin him in any day. But he took the risk. By nature he was very calm, soft, and slightly fearful. He had a beloved wife, Margaret. He loved and respected her, although repeatedly lied, hid the truth from her about the deal. Harvey was the cabinet minister, The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. He was a rival of James. James and Harvey were contenders for the Prime Minister of Canada, and they had equal opportunities to win. Harvey was more successful than James, he had a big following in the party, and he was respected among the people. Harvey was selfish. He had a son, Howard, who committed suicide. There was a raid to France; it was the first mission of Howard. When the navigator was wounded, Howard left the pilot`s seat and refused to fly. Then the navigator was dying. His father knew the truth about his son , but he built the legend of a hero`s death, in order to save his job. And another character, a very important character is Brian Richardson. He was the director of Howden`s party. He was an honest, hard-working, friendly person, who respected his boss.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays