Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Does General Haig Deserves to Be Remembered as the Butcher of the Somme

Good Essays
1566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does General Haig Deserves to Be Remembered as the Butcher of the Somme
Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as ‘the butcher of the Somme’?
General Haig was a famous general who won the last war in the First World War, he should be remembered as a hero, but why do people reckon him to be the opposite, as a butcher? As the ‘Butcher of the Somme ’? In my point of view, I think of general as a butcher rather than a hero, for he, in the first battle in the First World War, the battle of Somme, he used 420000 soldiers to defeat 500000 Germans soldiers and gain 10 kilometers of ground, not counting the French that used 200000 soldiers. His plans were all flawed, first he had the one week long artillery strike but what he did not think of was that Germans were humans and that humans have brains and knows how to change their plans. They dug trenches deeper and were unharmed by the attempt. Secondly, they forgot that artillery shells only exploded on impact and will send out shrapnel and that this will not destroy the barb wires but only make them fly up and tangle up more, causing a disadvantage to his own troops. The ways the British soldiers walk up to the Germans were too unrealistic and not professional. Walking up to the enemy and not taking cover? Ridiculous! Also if General Haig was with the soldiers together fighting and commanding, that would have boosted morale. As the people like to say, the British soldiers are lions led by donkeys. General Haig was a follower of a way of fighting called, attrition that means that when you fight an enemy to a point they can no longer bear, they will surrender of retreat. So, he used wave after wave of soldiers to ‘go over the top’ and fight the Germans. None of them work until the last great wave. They broke through the German defenses and captured 5000 German soldiers approximately. At the end, although the British have wasted loads of good men in this war, the Germans admitted that they are bitter and battered. One of the German Generals admitted this battle broke the heart of the German army. “We were completely exhausted,” he wrote, “if the war lasted, out defeat seemed certain.” General Haig and his army also contributed in saving Verdun and the French in it. The bad news is that the German army which was driven 10 kilometers back was unbeaten. The reason I believe he deserves to be called ‘the butcher of the Somme’ is because he, the general, who should have been leading the men into battle, was sitting 50 kilometers behind the front line where the soldiers are going ‘over the top’, trying to get back in one piece, and trying to capture enemy trenches while under fire . General Haig might have been drinking coffee in a big and clean bedroom with servants helping him, while the soldiers are living in muddy trenches full of disease and rats. General Haig might have been eating luxurious food and drinking clean water while the soldiers are eating army rations that are usually disgusting and drinking muddy, horrible water that might result in serious diseases that might result in death if not treated fast and properly. If they are not dead but seriously sick or ill, they will not be able to fight and will either be no use for the army for I while, medevaced back to the United Kingdom, or killed by the enemy. Although he is bad, we cannot only see one side to determine whether he is a good or a bad person. Actually the generals of the British army rose to fight every challenge they got and tried to adapt to the constant change involved in the war. However, no one cared to tell anyone about this. The reason they believed that the fault is on the generals is because of the scripts of the play “oh what a lovely war!”the British generals actually has a lot to do like planning and deciding sending the amount of people on missions and to manage the number of death coming from the army. They had so much to care about! The people should think more and not be zombiefied by some plays! The generals had a higher echelon up! Although Haig was pretty dumb, he was a very determined man and believed that the German line can be broken. Actually, he was the first to believe in this. In fact, he was also the first to break through the German line in the world war one. I believe this boosted the morale of the British army and the allied front as well as the western front. General Haig was a very traditional man and most of the generals are and they have a reason to be traditional, most of the generals have won their war traditionally with traditional tactics, like sending in the infantry first and then later send in the cavalry to finish the exhausted enemy. This tactic worked brilliantly until the 20th century when trenches came and barb wires and mines stopped the infantries and the mud slowed down the cavalry did the tactic not work. The tactic of sending in the seven day artillery strike was also not his idea. He was promised that the strike will destroy all the barb wires on the field. Also, he was promised that the trenches will be destroyed by the strike! Instead of this, the Germans just dug their trenches deeper and deeper until the artillery rounds no longer harmed them and stayed there for seven days, just feeling the shock of the rounds on the ground. On the field, the barb wires were also not destroyed! They were just thrown high into the sky and land back on the ground over and over again. There were only a few changes on the barb wires and the field, the barb wires are in a worse tangle and the field was full of huge craters. Instead of being successful in combat, they have wasted loads of human resources and lots of resources. But measuring the good and the bad points, I believe that the bad points are more than the good ones. As you see, there is loads of proof that supports the negative side than the positive side.
He did not know to change his tactics for in everyday in 140 days loads of soldiers go onto the top to attack the other side of the soldiers, just to get blown to heaven because of their tactics. Walking in a free fire zone? Crazy! With no cover, they’re as hopeless as babies! They should have ran across the no man’s land and run from cover to cover, so that even though the German spy planes have warned the Germans, they will give them less chance to survive and give themselves a better chance of survival, a better chance to help their country even more, a better chance in saving their country and stopping the Germans. His tactics are from Stone Age. He could have stopped the artillery strike, to save money for his country, but he believed the others, and let it continue. He lacked the knowledge of what the front line was like. He only relied on the reports his staff officers provided him with and he never really have gone to the front line before. So, this results in his rather ineffective 7 day shelling proposed by his officers, and the shelling of the trenches. He did not believe that his “sending people every day “over the top”” tactic was a failure, he never went to see it. He just believed that the men are ready to die for the king. When alternatives were shown to him, he simply turned it down.
The ways he trained his troops are inefficient, it lacked the realism of the battlefield like the gunfire and the shelling. There are no mud and no enemy, no barbed wire and no fear amongst the soldiers. This means that when Haig’s troops were facing the enemy, they were not prepared.
All his assaults provide heavy shelling against his enemies and even without spy planes, the Germans will know that an assault is coming. This is rather a disadvantage to the British for the element of surprise is gone, I believe. His wave of attack will be rather a massacre rather than an offensive move towards his enemies. So, to conclude this essay, I believe that general Haig deserves to be called “the butcher of the Somme’ because of his laziness and reluctance to go to the front line to observe the position his army is in, his reluctance to accept the alternatives, to change the way the soldiers were to advance into a fight, the tactics used, and the patterns used in the war, I believe that General Haig, the General who won the last war in the World War One, is the one responsible for all the loss caused in the Battle of the Somme. He should not be remembered as a national hero, rather a mass murderer, a killer and a person responsible for the Massacre of the Battle of the Somme. He was responsible for the death of 420000 British soldiers. So, to conclude my perspective again, Haig was “the butcher of the Somme”.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some people have the view that British generals such as Haig were useless leaders. Famous sources like ‘O What a lovely War’, ‘Blackadder’ and ‘The Trench’ support this. However from the 1980s many military historians have challenged this interpretation and states that under Haigs leadership, Britain and her allies won the war from encouraging new weapons and military tactics. After Haigs death in 1918, historians blamed him for needless laughter of nearly 750,000 British soldiers on the Western Front and biographers pilloned him for his overconfidence, insensitivity and logical shortcountings. However a new age group of scholars now believes that he may have been more a victim of position than a cruel monster. This essay will try and support and contradict this interpretation.…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gilbert, Martin. The Battle of the Somme: “It Is going to Be A Bloody Holocaust” The…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source B proposes that although the British were organized and everything was going according to their plan, the first line, which had nearly reached the German front line, were shot down due to machine-gun fire. The soldiers were caught in the open with no shelter and didn’t stand a chance. The machine guns were unexpected because Haig predicted that since the Germans had been bombarded with shells for a week, they would all be dead and their weapons would have been destroyed. Haig was complacent and this cost him dearly, the Germans had dug outs which provided shelter, these were often 40 feet in depth.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eisenhower gained Intel that men were going to be attacked in Ardennes near or on a narrow road call Elseborn Ridge. With that information General Eisenhower mobilized heavy artillery to that location anticipating an attack. The intelligence was correct, the fight lasted 10 days leaving blown up and wrecked vehicles blocking a clear path on the road forcing the Sixth Panzer Army retreat and seek another route. Simultaneously, the weather and the skies cleared allowing our airplanes to fly and drop bombs on the advancing German forces. At this point Hitler realized that he had underestimated the American Army.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though they won in the long run, the first day of the Battle of Somme was a major defeat for the British. Over 57,000 British soldiers died on the first day. According to George Coppard, hundreds of his fellow soldiers lay dead the morning after the attack. Many were caught in the barbed wire of the Germans trenches, leaving few survivors (Document B). The skillful thinking of the Germans saved them from facing a loss as grand as Britains.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 1 is an extract from Sir Douglas Haig’s final dispatch, published in March 1919. This source begins to describe the Battle of the Somme as a tremendous victory. Haig claims that “The three main objectives… had been achieved.” Haig also then begins to describe the three objectives, “Verdun had been relieved…”, “German forces had been held down…” and “the enemy’s strength had been considerably worn down”. Haig also claims that as the objectives had been “achieved” this was enough to “…justify the Somme Battle.” This source was published shortly after the war in 1919, but was a few years after the Battle of the Somme allowing some time for the truth about the events of the battle to emerge. The source has some limitations as it was an extract from Haig’s own writing, who was Commander-in-Chief of the British Forces therefore the source may be bias towards Britain and their success in the battle. The purpose of the source was to inform people of Haig’s perception of the battle and due to this being one person’s view, the accuracy of the source cannot be verified.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mission Command

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages

    With German forces on the run following the Allied success at Normandy and the breakout and pursuit across France, Allied forces were staged to enter Germany in late summer 1944. Both Field Marshal Montgomery and General Bradley clamored to be given the priority of effort. General Eisenhower chose Montgomery’s Operation MARKET GARDEN as the plan for action. It called for airborne forces to open the route for a ground force to move more than sixty miles up a single road, ending up north of the Rhine River near Arnhem, Netherlands. By accomplishing this task, the German Ruhr industrial heartland would be within easy grasp. But the operation failed. The ground force did not make it to the last bridge; it was six more months before Allied forces crossed the Lower Rhine River near Arnhem. Between 17 and 26 September 1944, there were 17,000 Allied casualties including eighty percent of the 1st Airborne Division (UK). The historical evidence overwhelmingly shows that the British 1st Airborne Division lost the Battle of Arnhem because of poor planning. This paper will prove the failure of The Battle of Arnhem was not solely the fault of MG Roy Urquhart. Although this was his first command of such a division (being an "outsider") could he have not completed his wartime mission any better despite having inexperienced leaders planning airborne operations, bad intelligence, allowing the Air Force to plan the DZs based off what was best for the air movement plan and poor execution. This paper examines MG Urquhart, the commander of 1st Airborne Division (UK).…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It truly was a massacre. The next morning (July 2nd) we gunners surveyed the dreadful scene in front of us...... it became clear that the Germans always had a commanding view of No Man's Land. (The British) attack had been brutally repulsed.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A hero is a person who believes that their enemy is not inherently malevolent, but also has wit and bravery. A good example of a hero is Benjamin Church. Church was an Englishman who went from leading a small group of men to leading an army. Church was brave, although he was injured he returned to war. church was also compassionate, he is against englishman who enslave or kill innocent Indians. Lastly Church had wit, his tactics for building an effective army and planned attacks were what brought the war to an end.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great War Dbq Essay

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Source 3 depicts the German’s confidence during the beginning of the Great War. The line “French and Russian they matter not” shows that Germany felt assured of its victory over them to the point that these two countries do not pose a threat and thus, do not matter. The customary toast of “to the day” also illustrates the confidence that the Germans had for defeating Britain. Yet, later in the war, the German soldiers’ confidence changed to a sense of despair. In evidence source 7, Erich Maria Remarque writes “Every man here knows that we are losing the war. Not much is said about it, we are falling back…” and emphasizes on the helpless situation with how the Germans starved, had few weapons left, did not have adequate soldiers in the new…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The successful Allied victories in Normandy during World War II forced the rival Germans to retreat to the Netherlands. These events enabled the Allied Forces to attempt the largest airborne operation in history Operation Market Garden in an attempt to make a final push to permanently defeat the Germans and end World War II. Unfortunately, this plan was destined to fail from the beginning. Overzealous leadership planning, limited logistical support, bad weather, and poor intelligence all being contributing factors to the failure…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1916 witnessed the commencement of the battle of the Somme. Through the course of that one battle, a million British men were slaughtered compared to the combined number of American casualties in both the first and Second World War. The Battle of the Somme was planned as a joint French and British operation, approved by Haig. However, the German attack on Verdun in February 1916 turned the Somme offensive into a large-scale British attack. Haig accepted responsibility for the action and with the help of Rawlinson who devised his own plan of attack. The vital part of Haig's strategy was an eight-day attack to destroy the German defenses. Soldiers were lined up according to battlefield strategies, and led by major officers. The blood of the nations was poured into conditions of such horror and violence. “Lions led by donkeys”, was how the German soldiers referred to their British counterpart. Ever since the end of WW1 in 1918 which was won by the British allies against the Germans it has been hugely debated whether the phrase 'Lions Led by Donkeys' is correct. In this essay I am going to talk about the extent of which the phrase was a fair description of what had happened at the battle of the Somme, by looking at different people’s point of view about General Haig.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Haig Is Bad Leader

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The battle of the Somme occurred on the 1th of July 1916, with the English and French army fighting against the German. English’s army’s leader, Haig, was considered to be a donkey, meaning to be a bad general. The historian John Laffin claims that Haig was an awful leader; he says that “Haig really thought he was doing what the people wanted him to do” which makes us think that he was being a good general. These facts may not be true as it was take nearly a 100 years after the war so the facts can be muddled up and he wasn’t there to witness it, he’s just saying from his point of view, but because Haig was deluded that he was doing the right thing and that it would work made him think he would win the war, but it didn’t happen. For this reason, Haig was a donkey.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “All quiet on the western front” the heroes that are in the novel would be the young men who died while fighting for their country. Many people believe a hero is an individual who epitomizes their own masculinity by sustaining a muscular figure with a gorgeous women on their arm. What I see is that a hero is someone who not afraid to lose their life to protect or save another person’s life. Soldiers are portrayed as people who ruthlessly kill and destroyed by the other side. People do not see the hardships that these soldiers endure when they fight for their own country and die protecting it. Even if the enemies of the other side are not helping the main characters they are still being heroic by fighting for their particular country. Individually the soldiers are not acting heroic but all together as one, they were heroes to have fought and return alive.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Haig Important

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Haig was a significant character for various reasons during World War One, most of which were negative. In his earlier days, Haig was significant because it was ultimately his leadership that resulted in a number of disasterous losses for the British Army, for example the Battle of the Somme (1916) which is still seen as one of the British Army’s biggest failures to this day. His intial failures stem from his backward leadership and poor connection with the British troops. Having said this, in the later part of his career as Commander, Haig is remembered for reasons such as: his ability to recognise the changing nature of warfare during World War One and capacity to adapt his tactics and learn from his mistakes. Overall the main reasons Haig…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays