Preview

Does Aristotle’s System of Political Classification Have Any Relevance to the Modern Day World?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Aristotle’s System of Political Classification Have Any Relevance to the Modern Day World?
Does Aristotle’s system of political classification have any relevance to the modern day world? Illustrate your answer with reference to Aristotle’s model When we trace the liberal democratic system back to its origin, we can see how the modern day liberal democratic model has been tweaked and improved from the classical model in which was introduced by Aristotle. He observed over 150 Greek city states to examine how they ran their political and economic affairs, categorizing them to the questions ‘Who rules?’ and ‘who benefits?’ From his studies, Aristotle classified six forms of political constitution: DOTMAP DEMOCRACY, OLIGARCHY, TYRANNY, MONARCHY, ARISTOCRACY AND POLITY. Aristotle’s purpose was to evaluate these forms of government in order to find the ‘ideal’ constitution. In his view, DOT DEMOCRACY, OLIGARCHY AND TYRANNY were all bad forms of government as the rulers (whether individuals, groups and masses) generally ruled in their own interests and at the expense of others. In contrast, MAP MONARCHY, ARISTOCRACY AND POLITY were found to be the preferred as they governed in the interest of all. Aristotle’s idea of democracy varies to the modern day, as we now see democracy as a government by the people in the interest of all. However there are two main aspects of Aristotle’s classification of democracy in which are still relevant to the modern day liberal democratic system and these are EQUALITY AND FREEDOM. These principles are reflected on all citizens (the people) being equal before the law and having equal access to power. In a representative democracy, every vote has equal weight and no restrictions can be applied to any person wanting to become a representative. The modern day liberal democratic system allows the people to vote who they would like to represent them and make decisions on their behalf. This is classed as a representative democracy in which the political office is secured through an election process. Aristotle believed that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Humanism In Greek Art

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Greeks displayed their humanistic values through government by they utilizing an effective system of self governing. This system was a direct democracy, which is defined as “government by the people” or “rule of the majority.” In the Athenian Democracy, the Assembly was…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several Greek city-states had the government form of an oligarchy, where the small group of people wield the ruling power. They were considered the highest class as political power was shared amongst the group (Carr). The groups were formed based off of aristocratic birth or wealth (Carr). Unlike this class, the lower class citizens in the oligarchy did not share the same rights as they lacked full political rights and were not eligible to rule (Carr). They are thus excluded from voting or having any type of say for any political decision for the city-state Furthermore, the right to vote or to be eligible for power was based off of wealth in this government form. In contrast to this government for his city-state lived under, Aristotle explores…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two most common types of regimes are democracy and oligarchy. All regimes desire to be wealthy, therefore all regimes are oligarchical to some extent, but more specifically oligarchies are regimes where the wealthy rule. Democracies on the other hand are defined as the rule of the majority, which is assuming that the majority ruling are the poor. One main point that Aristotle usually refers back to about the possible arrangements for regimes is that the rule of law is fundamental to all regimes. Without the rule of law, there is no regime, as Aristotle states: "for where the laws do not rule there is no regime." He also mentions that "the law should rule in all matters, while the offices and the regime should judge in particular cases." Aristotle does recognize that law has limitations, that being it cannot specify how it should be applied to each…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle truly believed that politics was a science that could be understood in the same way as anatomy or physics. Because of that he wrote this book to help people create a better more stable state. He starts by explaining the way in which a household is like a small state and clarifying the rules that must be put into place in regards to women, children and slaves all of which he seen as less than people with purpose. After dealing with this he begins his description of the different types of states, which he divides into six main primary forms. The first three that he would describe as proper states are monarchy, aristocracy and constitutional government. After that he describes the three corrupted forms as tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy. Monarchy is when one person who is the best in the state rules under the law for the sake of his citizens. This government though is often corrupted into tyranny where one person through strength holds his equals or betters below himself for his own benefit. Aristocracy is when the people who are above average join together to wisely run the state so that it might prosper. Often though it degrades into oligarchy where the power is all in the hands of a few who use the power to try maintain their position. Constitutional government is when people willingly submit to wise laws, which are put together to help the state. Democracy is its corrupted form…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 507 B.C. an Athenian leader named Clisthenes introduced political reforms that introduced democracy. Democracy means “rule by the people,” and the citizens vote to decide the rules of their country. The Greeks, especially the Athenians who founded democracy, provided citizenship, public education, and most importantly, freedom of speech. In order for there to be democracy, the citizens must feel safe in expressing their views and in criticizing the government. Even though democracy disappeared from history after the fall of Athens until the 1700s in America, its concept still hasn’t changed from time and it became Greece’s most enduring contributions to the world.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The ancient political philosophers, particularly Aristotle, believed that a successful republic could best be achieved through a mixed constitution (also called a mixed government), whereby power would be divided among a sovereign, a legislature, and the aristocracy. Politically, this entailed the separation of powers into distinct branches of government so that one branch could prevent another from tyrannizing the majority. The tendency toward despotism and corruption, in other words, would be limited because of the checks placed on power.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece is normally associated with the origin of democracy. Basically, Greek government evolved from single rule to small group rule to rule by the people. Because each city-state in ancient Greece possessed its own government, some of these types existed other than democracy, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy. This essay will compare and contrast the ancient governments, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy in Ancient Greek city states.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    It is known to most that western countries are on the rule of parliamentary democracy. We also know that Western countries inherited their political system from the ancient Greeks and Romans, especially the Roman political system. It has shaped the western parliamentary system more than any others. However, different parliamentary systems and their specific characteristics have shaped Ancient Rome from what it was to…

    • 4122 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Two major parts of the democratic ideal are equality and freedom. It means that each person is treated equally in the eyes of the law and each person has an equal say in the legislative process. We read in one of our readings in the text book that democracy has many parts, and most of them can be concluded by explaining popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty means that the government policies reflect the wishes of the people, government officials are elected in elections that are free and fair, people participate in the political process, there is lots of information available to the people and the majority rules. Another part of democracy is political equality, meaning that in decision making and process, each persons vote and voice is treated equally.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rome vs. Athens

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Roman republic and Athenian polis were two great experiments in political philosophy in the ancient world. These two distinctly different methods of running a nation in both Athens and Rome have one similarity – that they were founded on the intent to give common law and justice to the people. That aside both of the nations, which will be discussed in this essay, was culturally, economically and historically quite different and approached the issue of statecraft in a very different and sometimes contradictory manner. Both of these republics – the Roman and Athenian were regarded to be in their time two of the most powerful nations in the world – the Roman republic after the 2nd Punic war and the Athenian republic at the age of its most famous ruler Pericles. But how did these two nations, so different in their approach to life and philosophy itself, fall ultimately by their own system, which had served them for so long? They fell to the oligarchies that they were built and inte The Roman and Athenian republican both had a loathing (perhaps the Roman more so) for kingship and oligarchy in any of its forms. The republic fell to the whims of dictators such as the Triumvirs, Caesar and Sulla who abused its system, and Athens fell prey to tyrants using the turmoil after the Peloponnesian war to their advantage. One major similarity between the two nations is that they both had a growing degree of imperialism late in their republican period. The Athenian, abusing the rewards of the Delian league built to defend the common interest of Greece against the Persian empire, ended up with an empire which its’ small and inefficient form of statecraft was not equipped to manage. The Roman also found the same issue, which arose, like the Athenians, initially from a need for simple, honest self-defense. The two quotes below indicate the troubled and desperate issues that lead to the creation of these…

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle bases his idea of just and unjust law on society’s understanding of why the law exists. Ideal democracy, as we discussed in class, consists of citizens in a society being almost completely informed, educated, and involved in politics and the lawmaking process. As also stated, Democracy can pose a problem to leaders, since the public is knowledgeable. The ignorant are easier to manipulate and hide unjust law from, like in Martin Luther King, Jr’s current segregated society.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did you know that world leaders do not exactly agree on what a democracy means. A democracy’s most salient and universally agreed upon component is a voting system. Athens was not truly democratic because they had slaves, no woman rights, and no equal rights.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One important contribution of Ancient Greek to the Western Culture is Democracy. The very term itself is of Greek derivation, meaning “People’s Rule”. Unlike modern states which call themselves “Democratic”. For example, Pericles Funeral Oration gave the greatest contribution to our today’s society. In .(Doc. 2) Pericles stated “Our plan of government favors the many instead of the few”. Because of this quote it has contributed the society tremendously due to the fact that the democratic society is a direct democracy. Yet in a way, people have the power to overthrow other powerful representatives; Pericles Funeral Oration, gave us the idea of keeping the civilization as a democracy rather than Oligarchy, Monarchy, and many more. Moreover, Solon an Athenian tyrant discussed his thought about democracy. In .(doc. 4) Solon stated, “I drew up laws for bad and good alike, and set straight justice over each”. Solon reveals that he has created laws for the good of others. He wanted every individual having the same amount of justice. His quote contributed towards today’s civilization due to the fact that people are able to make “The Ten Commandments” showing that each and every individuals in the society deserves the same quality of Freedom and…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7A. According to Aristotle’s democracy, anyone can vote as long as they are citizens. Being a citizen means someone who is actively involved in politics. These citizens must participate in the government or household but they cannot do any other work besides that. They must also have some wealth and there should be a hierarchy because they are more educated and would know what to do in politics. Poor people should not be allowed citizenship to vote because they would be too busy working to devote enough time to education and self-improve themselves. They would not understand or know what to do in politics.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics