Dlk Case Study
Federal agents suspected DLK was growing marijuana in his home and scanned DLK’s home from outside with a thermal imager which is a device that detects warmth within the home. The results were consistent with the use of heat intensive lights used in growing marijuana indoors and based on the scan and other evidence, the agents were able to obtain a warrant which was used to search the home where they found more than 100 marijuana plants. Within the search and seizure case of DLK, the government did not go too far because they had suspicion, did not invade the privacy of the suspect, and there was danger of loss of evidence. A search is trying to find something by looking carefully and a seizure is taking your belongings. The police officers already has suspicion about DLK growing marijuana and taking the time to obtain a warrant would only less the chance of winning the case. The suspect, when searching his home, was found growing more than 100 marijuana plants which was never shown on the thermal imager because the thermal imager doesn’t show any parts of the home, it just detects where the heat is escaping from the exterior of the home (Doc C). The law enforcement already had
…show more content…
United States, police officers had suspicion about crime occurring (Doc A) but searched the suspect’s property in order to confirm their suspicion even though they did not have a warrant. In order to confirm their suspicion, the police officers, in the DLK case, used a thermal imager which detected heat radiating from the exterior of petitioner’s house (Doc E). The thermal imager did not invade the suspect’s privacy because it did not reveal any interior aspects of the home nor did it reveal any private activity in a private place but it rather detected the heat level from the exterior of the home. The heat waves measured escaped the home and entered the public domain (Doc F). Because it did not invade the privacy of DLK, the search did not require a
United States, police officers had suspicion about crime occurring (Doc A) but searched the suspect’s property in order to confirm their suspicion even though they did not have a warrant. In order to confirm their suspicion, the police officers, in the DLK case, used a thermal imager which detected heat radiating from the exterior of petitioner’s house (Doc E). The thermal imager did not invade the suspect’s privacy because it did not reveal any interior aspects of the home nor did it reveal any private activity in a private place but it rather detected the heat level from the exterior of the home. The heat waves measured escaped the home and entered the public domain (Doc F). Because it did not invade the privacy of DLK, the search did not require a