Preview

District Of Columbia V. Heller Case Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
645 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
District Of Columbia V. Heller Case Analysis
I personally believe that the meaning of a “well-regulated militia” is when citizens are properly following the laws and abide the rules of bearing arms. Militia can be defined as, “An army composed of ordinary citizens rather than professional soldiers” according to Gary the Gun Nut’s post on Thomhartmann.com. In the District of Columbia v. Heller case, gun control was the purpose problem. The case resulted in protecting the “Second Amendment of an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home,...” in which was a 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court.
According to statelaws.findlaw.com, the District of Columbia does not allow open carry of a firearm. My definition of the Second Amendment would affect the legitimacy of the gun control law in the District of Columbia because I believe people should be allowed to openly carry …show more content…
I understand that the District of Columbia would like to prohibit the carrying of firearm because they would not like a shooting to happen. Many shooting have occurred these past years from people opening fire at a crowd of citizens. Hundreds of people have died from gun shootings and I think that the District of Columbia is trying to prevent shootings from happening in their location. I believe that people would be safe when carrying a firearm in case a shooting where to happen or something were to harm them, they could protect not just themselves but others as well. People commit crimes everyday, even if it is prohibited to carry firearms, many people will find a way to get one either to protect themselves or hurt other. The shooting that have happened could not have been predicted. It happened by regular citizens. I want to be able to defend myself so I support the Second Amendment on people being able to “keep and bear
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay
    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Second Amendment Essay

    The argument that has lasted for centuries begins with the first part “A well regulated militia”. Over the years, many of the nation’s supreme courts have ruled in a lot of different ways. The definition of a well regulated militia means to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Study
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Study

    -shotguns and rifles could be owned but only if weapons were registered, kept unloaded and dissembled or restricted trigger locks.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Summary
    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    District Of Columbia Vs Heller Case Summary

    In the case District of Columbia ( DC ) vs Heller an officer for DC got declined for the permit to have a gun in his home for the year. After this he decided that this was unfair and took it to court. He pointed out that he was a police officer and he carries a firearm with him at all times for the protection of others and himself, but the court denied him the right to have a firearm for the protection of him and his family. The constitutional issue with this case is the fact that it’s how DC wanted gun owners to break down their guns, have a trigger lock on it, and keep the ammo away from the firearm even though the gun is broken down without the trigger lock.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Laws Case Summary
    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun Control Laws Case Summary

    In March 2008 the second amendment was reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the District of Columbia et al v. Heller case. The court stated that the second amendment allowed people to own guns. They concluded that the District of Columbia’s ban on guns was unconstitutional. The ban made it a crime to have an unregistered gun. The ban also required lawful guns to be stored unloaded and unassembled or have a trigger lock on it. The second amendment has limits though. These bans violate the second amendment.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Arguments Against Gun Control
    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Arguments Against Gun Control

    Those against gun control believe in these private protections. The Framers weren't able to predict everything the future would hold including the rapid growth in crime and violence. James Madison, who wrote the Constitution believed in the freedom and liberty of the individual, he discusses the advantages the private individual in America contained at the time with the right to bear arms compared to the many individuals of the nations in Europe. With the increase in violence and crime within the United States today the beliefs of James Madison and the framers become even stronger. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) the court recognizes that the government can regulate gun rights but that the Second Amendment does establish an individual right to bear arms. The Court said its decision should not be interpreted to question the right of government to: prohibit felons and the mentally ill from owning weapons, prohibit guns in schools or public buildings, ban certain categories of guns not commonly used for self-defense, and to establish certain other conditions on gun ownership. Thus, the Washington D.C. gun ban was overturned just as many other cities have done since then. If we eliminate this right to bear arms then we…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Rights APA
    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    2nd Amendment Rights APA

    The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The exact wording of the amendment has been changed twice before the U.S. Senate finally approved it in its present form.…

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Second Amendment
    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Second Amendment

    Pleading the Second Amendment to back up your gun rights is actually not a completely valid argument. Some people believe the Second Amendment not only allows them to own guns, but that the government cannot restrain those rights. This thought process on our rights in untrue not only in this circumstance but in all of our rights. The government can restrict our rights, and they do. The fact is, there are already limits on firearms by the government. For example: people cannot own machine guns, hand grenades, or shoulder-launched missiles and children, mentally ill, and felons cannot own any type of gun. The Supreme Court has refused to inspect the laws that bound the right to carry firearms and specific types…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Concealed Carry: The Right To Bear Arms
    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Concealed Carry: The Right To Bear Arms

    Because of the establishment of concealed carry legislation by all states over the years, it has been increasingly possible for almost every American citizen to carry concealed weapons in public places. As unfortunate and horrifying gun violence tragedies like the Newtown School Shooting and Sandy Hook school shooting repeatedly occur, whether citizens should have the right to carry a conceal handgun in public has created a massive uproar. People have different views about this issue. Just as the Second Amendment states that every human being has the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, many gun-rights advocates believe that reasonable citizens have the right to…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Laws Pros And Cons
    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun Control Laws Pros And Cons

    Gun control in the United States has become a highly controversial topic over the years. There have been plenty of debates on the gun control laws and people have taken to being either pro gun control laws or anti gun control laws. One thing we can’t deny would be that gun control laws would keep us all safer and even save lives. Statistic show that more guns equals to more homicide cases. If more citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill than if they didn’t have easy access to the guns. Public places like schools, restaurants, and churches are not acceptable places for people to be carrying guns; it puts the public in danger. It should be illegal.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Unconstitutional
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Gun Control Unconstitutional

    The issue is whether or not it is unconstitutional to have gun control in the United States. I think we shouldn't have gun control but support gun rights. Gun control would be against the common good. If the government took away the guns from citizens we would have no way of protecting ourselves. People wishing to use guns to harm people could smuggle them in from other countries and lie about having them. Therefore if a citizen had a gun, that citizen could hypothetically stop the other person from harming others.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stricter Gun Control Research
    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stricter Gun Control Research

    Washington has already managed to restrict guns in many cities and implement other controls such as the number of bullets you can have in a magazine. However the second amendment is clear in its defense of gun rights, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The phrase, “being necessary to the security of a free state” reveals that the purpose of the second amendment is to prevent abusive governments from seizing and staying in power. “[W]hat we are talking about here is not gun violence and how to limit it. What we are talking about here is the power of Barack Obama. It increases his power and the power of the government to disarm the citizenry. That is why the Second Amendment is in the Constitution, to protect the power of the people” (Ferrara). Limiting firearms is a direct violation of the second amendment because it is infringing on our right to fight for the security of our state. In order to really decrease gun violence, it would be necessary to disarm every citizen and criminal alike. Whether or not this is even feasible is debatable, but one thing is certain, it is not constitutional.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Gun Control Debate
    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Gun Control Debate

    Marjolijn Bijlefeld states from “The Gun Control Debate” that we have the right to carry “to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections, and repel Invasions.” At any moment across the nation a shooter could be lurking in plain sight. Congress has brought this problem up numerous times, allowing only a…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Importance
    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Second Amendment Importance

    The second amendment is an exceedingly controversial amendment in the constitution. The amendments right to bear arms was “instituted within the Bill of Rights to suppress insurrection, participate and uphold the law, enable the citizens of the United States to organize a militia, and to facilitate the natural right to self-defense” (Logan). Some citizens suggest the analysis of the “right of people” shows that it protects the individual rights of citizens to own personal guns. From whatever some “citizens” may assume the second amendment to be, it establishes defense, protection, and safety among each citizen. The intents of the second amendment is to delineate upon the freedom of each individual. Moreover, this personal liberty prevents citizens from tyranny and oppressive governing. People have the right to make their own choices and whatever he or she decides to do with that right is up to them. However, one should not use the second amendment to put others in danger like Chris Mercer, the shooter at Umpqua Community College in Oregon. The second amendment justifies individual liberties for people to protect themselves in all cases. From the shooting that occurred at an Oregon community college, the nation’s second amendment has been the topic of debate.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment
    • 2364 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment

    The Second Amendment to the Constitution says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (Agresti, 2009, para. 2). Based on a simple reading of this, it would seem that people do have the right to own and use firearms. So why are so many people trying to ban guns? Maybe it is because they do not understand what the Second Amendment actually means. Maybe it is because the media only reports the crimes committed with guns and not the lives saved with them. What would happen to the crime rate in the United States if guns were banned altogether as other countries have done? While some people think guns should be banned, it has been proven that criminals will still find ways to obtain them and the crime rate will rise.…

    • 2364 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Laws Increase Violent Crimes
    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun Control Laws Increase Violent Crimes

    The debate over people being allowed to carry guns has been going on for a long time. The real debate should be whether or not these laws are really reducing or increasing violent crimes in America today. According to the website, Gunowners.org, an individual can purchase any firearm from a federal, firearms licensee (FFL) in another state by going to his place of business(Gun). The right to keep and bear arms is addressed in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Federal gun laws are enforced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). They have done a really good job in the past. In my opinion, these gun laws aren’t reducing…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More