Preview

Distributive Justice and Its Relevance Under Indian Constitution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4950 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Distributive Justice and Its Relevance Under Indian Constitution
PAPER ON THE TOPIC
THE PHILOSOPHY OF DISTRUBUTIVE JUSTICE AND ITS RELEVANCE UNDER INDIAN CONSTITUTION

The jurisprudence of distributive justice, according to juristic cynics, is an essay in illusion. The basic social system is built on gross inequalities and the power to lobby and mould State policy, even judicial policy, is heavily in the hands of the proprietariat. Being social realists and meliorists we have to work with the materials that we have and try to read the constitutional provisions in such a manner that the human essence of distributive justice is won by dynamic interpretation and socialist understanding. The Indian Constitution visualizes an affirmative State action for bringing about a new social order based on justice, social, economic and political (Art. 38). The Directive Principles of State Policy contain the directions of change towards such a new social order. The researcher has examined various theories of justice and has examine how the John Rawl’s theory of justice which means that justice is fairness is the most apt for the Indian situation. Even in the Constitution we find different strategies of justice.
Keywords: Justice, Distributive Justice, Constitution.
INTRODUCTION
Ever since the birth of society, justice has been one of the most important quests of human endeavor. Justice means giving one what is due to him. As a principle of law, justice delimits and harmonises the conflicting desires, claims and interests in the social life of the people. In the modern society if we take the view that all its problem of distribution then the recourse is left open to distributive justice and nothing else. Distributive justice embraces the whole economic dimension of social justice, the entire question of distribution of goods and services within the society. It demands equality in the distribution or allotment of advantages or burdens.
The aim of distributive justice is to strike a balance in the socio-economic structure of the society and bring

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle once said, “It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered”. In our society there are theories of justice, which is Retribution, Utilitarianism and Restitution. These forms have similarities and differences and are use in many different social groups every day.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Justice is the principle that free and rational persons concerned to further their own interests would accept in an initial position of equality as defining the fundamental terms of their association. Greatest benefit to the least advantaged.…

    • 4727 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Justice refers to the theory that everyone is entitled to a fair and equal share of resources regardless of who they are or how much they have contributed. (ANA, n.d.)…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice is a complex matter affecting issues in all contexts of our society; it can affect both the individual and society at large. Justice can be defined in 2 different ways; there is moral justice and legal justice, moral is the right to being treated fairly by society, regardless of skin, religion or disability and legal being defined as the actions taken when the moral code has been broken. For example, in ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ written Harper Lee and ‘My Name is Khan’ directed by Karan Johar, both protagonists fight against the injustices in their societies based on an individual injustice and through this they have a massive impact on their community at large.…

    • 2029 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Distributive Justice Robert Nozick From Anarchy, State, and Utopia, 149-182, with omissions. Copyright @ 1974 by Basic Books, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Basic Books, a subsidiary of Perseus Books Group, LLC. The minimal state is the most extensive state that can be justified. Any state more extensive violates people's rights. Yet many persons have put forth reasons purporting to justify a more extensive state. It is impossible within the compass of this book to examine all the reasons that have been put forth. Therefore, I shall focus upon those generally acknowledged to be most weighty and influential, to see precisely wherein they fail. In this chapter we consider the claim that a more extensive state is justified, because necessary (or the best instrument) to achieve distributive justice; in the next chapter we shall take up diverse other claims. The term "distributive justice" is not a neutral one. Hearing the term "distribution," most people presume that some thing or mechanism uses some principle or criterion to give out a supply of things. Into this process of distributing shares some error may have crept. So it is an open question, at least, whether redistribution should take place; whether we should do again what has already been done once, though poorly. However, we are not in the position of children who have been given portions of pie by someone who now makes last minute adjustments to rectify careless cutting. There is no central distribution, no person or group entitled to control all the resources, jointly deciding how they are to be doled out. What each person gets, he gets from others who give to him in exchange for something, or as a gift. In a free society, diverse persons control different resources, and new holdings arise out of the voluntary exchanges and actions of persons. There is no more a distributing or distribution of shares than there is a distributing of mates in a society in which persons choose whom they shall marry. The total…

    • 5663 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite what the dictionary says, there are many definitions of the word justice based on the world’s opinions. The opinions, then depend on the situation at hand. There is the discussion of justice for the person who has been hurt, for the person who has conceived a crime, and even for those who have committed an accident. In the end, justice is intended to establish an equal solution for any circumstance. However, there will be times where injustice is present in the justice system.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The perceived fairness of how resources and rewards are distributed is called distributed justice. Procedural justice is described as the perceived fairness of the process and procedures (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). Research suggests that procedural justice is more directly connected to the evaluation of system or institutional characteristics, whereas distributive justice is more vastly linked to the evaluation of specific outcomes (Folger, Konovsky, 1989).…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice delivery system and mechanisms have throughout the ages evolved as a tool to make justice and fairness prevail in the society. The pivotal object of any legal system across the globe is to provide justice equally and therefore no discrimination based on who comes before the court. If this object is to be accomplished then it becomes essential to develop principles of law in such a manner that, in so far as possible, similar cases will lead to similar decisions. This requirement of uniformity and consistency runs through all branches of law and for any legal system or justice delivery mechanism it is necessary to follow a consistent and similar modus operandi so that justice can be met equally to all.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Shapland (2011) Justice is defined as the quality of being righteous, fair; equitableness or moral correctness. Justice is a term that can be very tricky and many people have often and easily confused with or used interchangeably with the term fairness. In most circumstances, whether at your workplace, your school, your local pub, or in the courtroom, people want to believe that they always want to feel that they deserve and are owed to be treated fairly after being wronged. There are two different types of justice such as Restorative Justice and Retributive Justice. Restorative justice has recently become a very popular yet controversial topic. With it being such a controversial topic there have been a few key elements of the restorative justice program that have been at a longstanding debate. They key elements consist of weather restorative justice should be defined as a result or a process, whether the approach should contain some type of form of punishment, and lastly, whether the approach should contain some type or form of punishment, and lastly whether or not it should be considered as a replacement to the traditional criminal justice system or be integrated into it.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The theory of justice is a work of political philosophy and ethics by John Rawls. According to Gomez, philosopher John Rawls who lived between 1921- 2002, argued the notion of social justice as fairness in his book "A Theory of Justice." He used foundations of utilitarian and Kantian philosophy to create a possible technique to estimate the ethics of social and political institutions. The principles of justice theories was Rawls 's theory and it is dependent on two important and central principles of social justice that, according to Rawls, assures a just and morally acceptable society. The first principle of social justice states “every person has a right to the most basic liberties, same as any other person who has a right to the same liberties.” The second principle of social justice states “all people should have access to the same social and economic positions and be able to take advantage of them”.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of distributive justice is relevant in our society due to current thoughts on economic inequality in politics. The political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick have differing views when it comes to the topic of distributive justice. This analyze the positions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, finding that Nozick’s view of distribution is preferable to Rawls’ difference principle because people deserve to keep what they earn and their earnings should not be taken away from them because that would be a violation of their personal liberties.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of justice is one applicable to various facets of life due to the possibility of conflict that exists in the space of interpersonal interactions. Modern society allocates the task of making these decisions to the criminal justice system, which is thereby the primary destination when seeking fairness and equality in justice. However, the reality is less than ideal since here are various elements that can curtail the delivery of equal justice, such as racial and socioeconomic backgrounds among other factors. As a result, there is an increasing need for the criminal justice system to come to terms with the biases that hinder the effective delivery of justice and thereby create imbalances in our society. In order to achieve this notion of equality in the delivery of justice, it is thereby imperative for the justice system to…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soc 331

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, let us look at what the definition are for retributive, commutative, and distributive justice. Retributive justice “is the proper response to people who have acted unjustly, commutative justice is a fair exchange-through contract, covenant, or other agreement- that fulfills the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved, and the distributive justice is justice in the distribution of goods and services” (Driesbach, 2013).…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle, a Greek philosopher, was born 384 years before Christ (BC). He separated justice into two parts – distributive justice and corrective justice. Distributive justice is concerned with the fair distribution of society’s wealth. He went onto say that this wealth should be spread according to merit and an individual’s contributions into society. So this system relies on giving to those who have contributed in some way rather than to those who are needy. Aristotle said that distribution on the basis of people needs merely rewards the lazy and so would be unjust. Corrective justice he said, is needed to ensure that individuals can keep their entitlements. He believed that if someone is to steal from another the court should ensure that the offender does not gain and the victim does not lose out. This idea can still be seen in areas of law such as compensatory damages for negligence.…

    • 3979 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of justice involves fair, just and equal treatment. These facets are found in a person’s personal, moral courage and integrity however fairness and equality can often be limited by prejudice and discrimination. This means that those who fall victim to injustice are not subjects because of their own actions but are rather victims of a system, society or collective action.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics