Preview

Discuss the Economics on the War on Drugs

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discuss the Economics on the War on Drugs
Microeconomic policy and princliples.

Discuss the Economics of the war on drugs:
The global war on drugs has been a downhill battle with no apparent success, which has also hailed devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world. Since the initiation of the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, set up in 1961, and ex U.S. president Nixon’s declaration of war on drugs in 1971, billions of dollars and 10,000’s of lives have been lost in this failing attempt to control the flow of these substances; in which the attempt to do so has also created a destabilising effect on the world economy. The cost of the war on drugs has been spread over a wide variety of avenues, including criminalization, rehabilitation and counter measures aimed at the producers, trafficker’s and consumers of illegal drugs, all of which have not sufficed effectively to reduce the demand for supply and consumption. Enforcers in this ever-present battle face a huge complexity in how to tackle their opponents, who are constantly updating and adapting their methods of trafficking and supplying the illegal substances. In this essay I will discuss the arguments for and against the war on drugs, the impacts on society and the world economy after four decades of this issue. In doing so, I will critically examine the problem using the three economic principles used to assess the effects of the war on drugs, which are scarcity, gains from trades and supply and demand. This analysis is intended to raise such questions as “do governments policies create economic market of its own? Or, do the same economic principles explain government behaviour? Do any of these economic principles explain how bad polices continue with very little or empirical evidence of success?
The war on drugs is arguably a tough case to take sides on. Both sides for and against tackling the matter both have heavy implications on society whether it be economically or socially. In this paragraph I will



Bibliography: Commission report: World Drugs Problem, ten years on. Memo/09/103. Brussels, 10 March 2009: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/09/103&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en Black Money: The Business of Money Laundering. David Smith, 8 June 2011. http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-news/black-money-the-business-of-money-laundering.08-06.html 22/01/10 Fraud losses cost the UK £30 billion a year. 22 January 2010. http://www.moneylaunderingcompliance.com/index.php/general-information/22-01-10-fraud-losses-cost-the-uk-30bn-a-year http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8640399.stm http://web.archive.org/web/20060720100713/http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/world_drug_report_2005.html http://www.incb.org/pdf/e/ar/2002/incb_report_2002_1.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    It has been established that when drugs are taken excessively for recreational purposes they can have negative effects on a person’s mind and body. Thus, it is understandable why a government may want to ban or limit the uses where possible. However, many drugs have outstanding health benefits that provide people with the ability to live a normal life. With all the pros and cons it is evident that regardless of a governments legal stance against illegal substances drugs will find their way into the hands of users. Through out this paper we will look at the various pros and cons of legalization and decriminalization. Touch upon how each might effect the demand and supply side of the underground and above ground economy. And finally, take a look at how governments on each side of the argument operate.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Mares, David R. Drug Wars and Coffee Houses: The Political Economy of the International Drug Trade. Washington, D.C.: CQ, 2005. Print.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Richard Nixon first declared a “war on drugs” in 1971, the war escalated during the Reagan presidency and shifted its focus from treatment toward incarceration and law enforcement. As George Moss and Evan Thomas explain, Reagan came to Washington “committed to waging a war on drugs and bringing the international drug trade under control” in 1981. Thanks to the rise of the Medellin Cartel in Colombia and other cartels in Latin America during the 1980s, illegal drug trade networks flourished, and America became “the world’s major consumer of illicit drugs.” This increased usage of drugs led to many social crises, including heightened urban crime and health problems, which encouraged both the Reagan administration and private groups…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prohibition In The 1920's

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gaylord and Harold H. Traver provide descriptions of different drug policies in various countries. By doing this they are able to broaden the readers knowledge of how the world views the use and distribution of drugs and other substances.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past two years, drug violence has become a fixture of the daily news. Some of this violence pits drug cartels against one another; some involves confrontations between law enforcement and traffickers. Recent estimates suggest that thousands have lost their lives in this “war on drugs.” Prohibition creates violence because it drives the drug market underground. This means buyers and sellers cannot resolve their disputes in orderly ways, so they turn to violence instead. The only way to reduce violence there fore is to legalize drugs. Fortuitously, legalization is the right policy for a slew of other reasons. If drugs were legal, the consequent unemployment could cause economic problems; but in contrast it could reduce violence and produce great opportunities for economic development (Borden 44). The right policy, therefore, is to legalize drugs while using regulation and taxation to dampen irresponsible behavior related to drug use, such as driving under the influence. This makes more sense than prohibition because it avoids creation of a black market. This approach also allows those who believe they benefit from drug use to do so, as long as they do not harm others. Magazine Publisher, David Borden said, “I argued, prohibition fuels violence and disorder, particularly in the inner cities, and these conditions drive away business and make every other method of addressing poverty far more…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is a large majority of people arguing good points on either side of this drug war, in which they are opposed with one another, in which one side says, “Drug enforcement is engaged in controlling the spread and remedying the effects of drug abuse.” There are also those that state that these laws and programs are designed to help decrease America’s dependence on illicit substances. The people from the another side of this argument begs to differ, as they claim that the drug war is an utter failure, ex-presidential candidate Ron Paul explains, “This war on drugs has been a detriment to personal liberty and it 's been a real abuse of liberty." In another section Ron mentions that, “Our prisons are full with people who have used drugs who should be treated as patients -- and they 're non-violent. Someday we 're going to awaken and find out that the prohibition we are following right now with drugs is no more successful, maybe a lot less successful, than…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Pharma

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The media constantly bombards viewers with the so-called “war on drugs”; indeed the issue that many nations face is one of concern. Due to competition among drug cartels, innocent people suffer injuriously; therefore, these nations wage a theoretical war against the spread and corruption of drugs. However, aside from there being a “war on drugs”, it seems that in today’s modern quest for perfect health, or at least prolonged health, the drug industries in the United States (also addressed as Big Pharma) compete to find and sell the next big drug. These drug industries do not wage war against drugs, instead a “war for drugs”.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War On Drugs In The 1960s

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultimately the new “war on drugs” had a negative impact on American life during the mid 1980s-early 2000s due to the economic costs, the strain put on our justice system, and the civil liberty violations that occurred. As with any other war or bureaucratic endeavor, money must be heavily drawn upon and invested. When discussing the overall cost of this “war” through this time, congressman Lee Hamilton stated that, “Federal and local governments spend over $3 billion each year to fight drugs.” (cite) In his quote it becomes apparent that the United States had become highly invested and arguably obsessed in a seemingly impossible “war.”…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I intend to talk about the repeated effect of the drug war. Forty years ago, the world declared war on drugs. Today, after decades of failing to adequately control drug consumption, an even greater problem has emerged: violent drug traffickers have taken the industry hostage and will stop at nothing to preserve their power. ( Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies;Summer2011, Vol.18 Issue 2, p901-927, 27p). Drug trafficking is the most widespread and lucrative organized crime operation in the United States, with an annual income estimated to be as high as 110…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War on drugs

    • 4800 Words
    • 20 Pages

    In this paper I will evaluate America's War on Drugs. More specifically, I will outline our nation's general drug history and look critically at how Congress has influenced our current ineffective drug policy. Through this analysis I hope to show that drug prohibition policies in the United States, for the most part, have failed. Additionally, I will highlight and evaluate the influences acting on individual legislators' decisions to continue support for these ineffective policies as a more general demonstration of Congress' role in the formation of our nation's drug policy strategy. Finally, I will conclude this analysis by outlining the changes I feel necessary for future progress to be made. Primary among these changes are a general promotion of drug education and the elimination of our current system's many de-legitimating hypocrisies.…

    • 4800 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Office of National Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Budget: FY 2014 Funding Highlights. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, April 2013. Web. Feb. 19. 2014…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet people in law enforcement and local communities are not convinced for good reasons. Although casual illegal drugs use appears to fluctuate and may have declined in recent years, the regular usage of these drugs has not. The government warning about how dangerous these are, such as; heroin, marijuana, cocaine, and methamphetamine only confuse matter further. Actually, such warning are an indication that these drugs are unwinnable. Production sources , smuggling techniques, purity price and use patterns have changed through the years in dynamic drugs markets as governments has made claims of progress, but the war on drugs that began in 1914 has no end in…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, prohibiting a commodity for which there is high demand inevitably creates profit opportunities for criminal entrepreneurs, pushing production, supply and consumption into an illicit parallel economy. Countries all around the world have been struggling with the war on drug trafficking which has led to illegal acts involving cartel organization, manufacturing, distribution, trafficking and the addiction to drugs.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    War on Drugs Has Failed

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Having spent over $400 billion over the course of the American drug prohibition effort, it might be prudent to ask the question, "Are we making any progress?" ("Ron"). Amazingly, the answer from experts on both sides of the issue is a resounding "no." It is clear at this point that the War on Drugs has ultimately failed, while the collateral consequences of pursuing drug prohibition have left America in a disastrous state, rife with both economic and social problems.…

    • 2403 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Drug policy regarding the control of the traditional illicit substances (opiates, cocaine, cannabis) is currently moving through upbeat times in almost all Western countries. Prohibition on the basis of repressive law enforcement not only seems to fail on a large scale, but also to create vast additional costs, problems, and harm for drug consumers, who often find themselves in extreme social, economic, and health conditions” (Fischer 1995: 389).…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays