Preview

Directors Duties

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Directors Duties
5. Director’s Duties
Director’s Duties are part of the idea of risk management; because they take risks all the time, they require a certain element of regulation. The law must provide a way of mitigating against the risk, so creditors and shareholders can have potential recourse. This is all done indirectly; the company will recover in the event of a breach of duty arising. If the company recovers and suffers no harm, then that protects shareholders and makes sure their investments are secure. It also protects the creditors, who are more likely to get paid.
The Directors owe their duties to the legal entity- the company. This is intended as a protective requirement for both shareholders and creditors. When the director pays back or compensates the company, the creditors have a pool for recovery and the shareholders do not count the loss directly.
The person who takes the case for a director’s breach is the company, not a shareholder or creditor, subject to some exceptions.
See Dawson International v Zouts Patton, where a company was subject to a takeover bid and the Shs wanted to dispose of shares. The directors, however, felt that this was not in the best interests of the company. It was found that the Directors are allowed to act in a way if that way is in the best interests of the company, even if it is against the interests of the shareholders.
See also Re Frederick Inns, where a company became insolvent. When this happens, the directors duties are transferred to the creditors. They have a duty to the creditors not to dissipate the company’s assets. This has been criticised by Fehily as a very vague judgment. Seems more a creation of a new duty rather than a transfer.
Courtney has criticised the 1990 Act at s52, where Directors owe a duty to the company to take into account the interests of employees and shareholders.
Obligation not to make a secret profit
Directors are not allowed to appropriate or direct business ooportunities to themselves

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Company is a form of corporation and regulated by the Corporations Act. The legal significance of being as a company is it exists as a separate legal entity and dependent upon human beings to make decisions on their behalf. The person who makes or participates in making decisions that affect the whole or a substantial part of the company’s business can be defined as a director. The legal definition of director is stated under section 9 of the Corporations Act[1] which indicates that, it is more appropriate to look at the function of the people rather than at the job title itself. Duties are imposed on the directors to regular illegal behavior and ensure that they act for the benefit of the company. All directors and officers of a corporation are bound by a number of general law and statutes which include that:…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Allen’s Arthur Robinson.2007, Directors Duties during Insolvency, 2nd Edition, and Thomson Law book Co., ISBN 9780455223490.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Insolvent Trading

    • 4434 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Those who support the duty argue that it provides appropriate protection for the unsecured creditors of companies. Those who oppose the duty argue that it has the effect of making directors unduly risk adverse which can result in directors too quickly putting companies into voluntary administration or liquidation for fear of personal liability (which may have a negative financial impact on unsecured creditors).…

    • 4434 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Company Law 266 Assignment

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One advantage to set up a company is when the company has debts, Shareholders of a company are not liable (in their capacity as shareholders) for the company’s debts (Guides to obligations of proprietary limited companies 2012). As shareholders, their only obligation is to pay the company any amount unpaid on their shares if they are called upon to do so. However, if a shareholder is also a director, the situation could be different. According to the case, the people who set up the coffee company each own 1000 shares at 2 at $2 a share and all shares are to be fully paid.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    It is a general rule of common law that directors’ fiduciary duties are owed to the company and not to individual shareholders based on the act of incorporation and the effect of the distinct legal character of a company. S. 172 CA 2006 has somewhat extended this duty by stating that directors have a duty to promote the success of the company ‘for the benefit of its members as a whole’ and taking into consideration the interests of other stakeholders. In Peskin v Anderson, the court held…

    • 4812 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    But a number of cases do suggest that the focus should be on shareholders. Others have said that the directors are to act in the interests of the company. Besides that, they also indicated that the interests of the company involve much more than the interests of shareholders.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was held that in “any legal proceedings in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company, the proper claimant is the company”. Although logical on its face, the rule presented multitudinous frustration for courts over the years.…

    • 3255 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Article Reflection

    • 3620 Words
    • 15 Pages

    If a company is likened to a small democratic nation, then its directors are its government. Once elected and in control, the directors have almost total power over the operation of the company until they are removed. Therefore, duties must be given to directors, to ensure they act in the proper manner.…

    • 3620 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Multiple Directorship

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Issue of multiple directorships has recently came to public concern. It becomes more and more common that directors in listed companies retaining multiple directorships and even some legislators are involved. This situation is popular in Hong Kong and Singapore, however, many directors in United States are usually involved in one company only.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    assigment

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Directors owe a fiduciary duty to corporation, as such; directors must ensure the corporation’s interests always priorities. It is the fiduciary duty of the director to act honestly and in good faith, with a view to the best interests of the corporation…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Notes- Shareholder Remedies

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages

    - directors acted in affairs of company in own interest, not interest of members a whole, or any other manner that appears to be unfair/unjust to other members s461(e)…

    • 2599 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    NATURE Of Audit

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Directors or other managers of an enterprise have the responsibility of stewardship for the property of that enterprise.…

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The most general obligation of a director is the duty of acting in good faith. This requires a director to always discharge the responsibilities of the office of director honestly, conscientiously, and fairly. It also requires a director to make decisions for the corporations that are in the best interests of all the corporation's shareholders and not for the advantage or benefit of one group over another.…

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Finance

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First and most importantly, derivative action can protect the company where the wrongdoers are the controller of the company and trigger fraud against the minority. As an exception to Foss v Harbottle rule, an individual member may bring a derivative action when abuse of power occurred by the majority. It is described as fraud on minority. The company will be joined as a defendant in this instance, with the intention that the court will grant the remedy sought to the company; it is the company which is harmed by the abuse of power (Stott, 2011). According to Alexander v Automatic Telephone Co (1900), directors who abuse their power to obtain benefits at the expense of company without informing other shareholders is regarded as fraud on minority. In Daniel v Daniel (1978), the court held that the minority shareholders can sue where there is fraud and the majority directors confer some benefits for themselves in the advantage of company. When fraud had been detected and harm caused to the…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Section 28. Removal of directors or trustees. – “Any director or trustee may be removed from office by a vote of stockholders holding or representing at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding capital stock or if the corporation be a non-stock corporation, by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the members entitled to vote. “…

    • 2682 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays