Preview

Direct Characterization Of Benjamin In Animal Farm

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Direct Characterization Of Benjamin In Animal Farm
You would think that elderly people would be the wisest of us all, so wise that they could be a leader in fact, well at least I think that they could, they know so much, more than us teenagers know. All elderlies are smarter than us but they all don’t have the same personality, some could be irritating, others joyful. Would the irritating elderlies fit to be a good leader, who’d they want to be one at all? In Animal Farm, George Orwell uses indirect characterization of Benjamin to illustrate his role on the farm, revealing that he’s not suitable to rule the farm as a leader. Benjamin’s detachment in Animal Farm came from his stereotypically stubborn and crotchety personality. Benjamin isn’t your average animal on the farm, he acts in a way to hate the other animals, he is devoted to being around and caring for Boxer at all times, no matter what’s going on around the farm, when Boxer was injured Benjamin was there to aid him, “He seldom talked, and when he did, it was usually to make some cynical remark…Alone among the animals on the farm he never laughed. If asked why, he would say that he saw nothing to laugh at. Nevertheless, without openly admitting it, he was …show more content…
Benjamin, detached from the rebellion but he did still criticize the rebellion even though he didn’t care about it, guided by a skeptical philosophy, all showing the same meaning, he’s not fit to be the leader of Animal Farm, he doesn’t care about anything on the farm as George Orwell has shown us, Benjamin is the type of person that only cares about himself and Boxer, no-one else. Not everyone is capable to be a leader, it’s just that we all are unique, maybe Benjamin didn’t want to be the leader of Animal Farm in the first place. George Orwell specifically made Benjamin to be like this, so that he couldn’t be fit to be a leader in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the novel, Animal Farm, written by George Orwell, where there is one specific character, Napoleon, who took a role in this book whom was a natural leader for the sake and future for Animal Farm. Napoleon is a pig who takes upon leadership for all animals, makes roles and differences as before Mr. Jones or Snowball lead the farm, but also acts as if he was a dictator. From these facts about Napoleon, it shows how animal farm will be under circumstances of his actions and his temperament that the farm will face. Napoleon is known as the antagonist in the story, and as for the quote ‘’Napoleon took no interest in Snowball’s committees’’ (Orwell 34). In this quote, it shows Napoleon’s perspective against other leader(s) which he had no interest…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Like all books, "Animal Farm", the book, is different from "Animal Farm", the movie. One of the reasons is the characters. Some of the characters that were in the book were not in the movie. Those were characters like Mr. Whymper, Clover, and Mollie (who was only shown in part of the movie). In the movie, Jessie, the dog that was only mentioned in the first chapter, replaced Clover. Jessie narrated the story, was the main character, and was in the story the entire time.…

    • 351 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    snowball vs napoleon

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the film ‘animal farm’ based on George Orwell’s novel, we are presented with two pigs, snowball and napoleon. They both believe manor farm is in desperate need of change, but both aim to achieve it differently. Over the course of the film we see that Orwell's message that Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely hints that regardless of who the leader of Animal Farm would be, the revolution was doomed to fail from the beginning.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Irony is visible in the fact that the leaders the animals though they wanted, eventually become the exact same as the leader they overthrew. Orwell uses this powerful irony to illustrate the deeper idea pervading the story--the issue was not a matter of who had complete power, but a matter of whether one leader should have absolute power at all. The animals thought that their issue was with the fact that a human was in control. The animals of Manor Farm believed that if only an animal was in control, then they would have the utopian society that Old Major had dreamt of. However, Orwell promptly shows that this is not the case, but quite the contrary. Orwell shows through the animals of Animal Farm, that it makes no difference who the leader is if they have absolute power. Power has a way of corrupting people, a fact that Orwell knew to be true, and he uses his masterful literary skills to illustrate this…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Harder Girl Monologue

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Everyone else on the farm would think I was crazy and would just report me to Napoleon, and I would probably be sentenced to death. The more I thought about it, the more I thought of how impossible it seemed. I mean in all seriousness, Going against the whole Animal Farm by myself would be close to impossible, even if i'm the strongest horses on the farm, but i was hoping the talk with Benjamin would help. “Hey kid” Benjamin said quietly “You'll never get tired of that will you?” I said with a smirk.…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Animal Farm’, by George Orwell, is a novel that shows how easily leaders can be corrupted and how it can attract differently to the characters in the novel. Even though that power can be easily corrupted in the hands of a tyrant, power is both morally good and bad. Old Major, before his death holds his power for the good of his fellow comrades. After the death of the Major, the characters; Napoleon and Squealer abuse their use of power for bad. As there use of power is unrestricted the holders of power are liable to be corrupted causing there fellow comrades to suffer from their actions and consequences.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To commence, the characters in both novels represent vulnerability in a similar fashion through characters in two different ways, the first of which is vulnerability through gullibility. In Animal Farm, Orwell uses the characters Boxer and Clover to embody this characteristic; this is especially clear when Orwell writes, “Having once accepted the pigs as their teachers, they absorbed everything that they were told, and passed it on to the other animals” (Orwell 37). Without using reason to analyze the pigs intentions and motifs, the horses are unable to realize that they are being manipulated into helping the pigs complete their plans to enslave the other animals. Their ignorance thus leaves them vulnerable to the malices of the real world.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In George Orwell’s Animal Farm, the brilliance of Old Major’s barnyard speech inspires the animals to rebel because of his strong evidence and emotional appeal. This speech was the start of a new beginning for the animals.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No one that imbecilic should ever be in a position of power because whatever was being ruled would be immediately be driven into the ground by the lack of knowledge in ruling. The only animals with even some cognition of the real world were the pigs, horses, dogs, and Benjamin, seeing as “None of the other animals on the farm could get further than the letter A” (33). The inability of being able to even learn the alphabet then disqualifies them for the position of a satisfactory leader. So why couldn't Benjamin lead if he was one of the intelligent animals? He could “read as well as any pig” (33). But, he was lazy and “he never exercised his faculty” (33), meaning that he may be smart, but he is also quite careless about what goes on around the farm. None of the animals on Animal Farm were fit for ruling due to their lack of intelligence, laziness, or their…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The attitude you have towards work can be greatly influenced by how the person in charge runs things. This statement is true in George Orwell’s allegorical novella “Animal Farm.” The attitudes of the animals of Manor Farm (later changed to Animal Farm) change depending on who is in charge of it. Under Mr. Jones’ rule, the animals were overworked, tired and starved, and they did work only to avoid being beaten. Under the reign of Snowball and Napoleon, the animals were tired but they were well fed and happy to do work. This is because the work they did benefited themselves, rather than humans who gave nothing back to them. Finally, under Napoleon’s supremacy, the animals liked work less and less because they were tired, overworked and underfed.. So, as you can see, the person who is in control of animal farm affects the way the animals feel about work.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How dangerous is blind loyalty to corrupt leaders? In Animal Farm, by George Orwell, the animals gain freedom from the humans, but after trying to create an equal society on the farm, Napoleon begins to abuse his power towards the animals, yet most stay loyal to him. In Animal Farm, blind loyalty to a cocherrupt leader becomes the downfall of many through Boxer’s and Clover’s loyalty to Napoleon.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Farm is about leaders and followers. All of the leaders take control of the followers. The pigs, which are the leaders on the farm,…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebellion is a new hope for many, but a corrupt leader may change the definition of freedom overtime. A leader would make everyone believe in them and when are right, but slowly change into a power hungry ruler. Many counties have experience with this kind of rulers such as the Costa Rica or Russia, who took over at the country’s weakest time. George Orwell, Eric Arthur Blair, writes Animal Farm based on the Russian Rebellion that happened in 1917. As Russia rebels, the rebellion leaders slowly took power and changes the aspect of their rebellion. Our society reflects upon freedom and our choices, rulers may not affect us in the same way as they would in a monarchy or dictatorship. Our leader is chosen by us while in Animal Farm, their leader, Napoleon is chosen by him gaining power and fear over the animals and being automatically chosen for power since no one else to opposes him. Leadership in this book is chosen by corrupt power and fear over the animals which isn’t reflected in the leaders in our society and community, but is recognized in places by leaders before.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    animal farm

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first thing that the animals changed about the farm is the name. They changed the name of the farm from Manor farm, to Animal farm. They all learn the song "beasts of England" that Old major had taught them before the rebellion. They have also made up 7 commandments that all animals on the farm must live by. They use the phrase "four legs good, two legs bad," to remember the 7 commandments. They use this because not all animals on the farm can read, but sense the rebellion a lot of them have learned, or have learned few letters of the alphabet. The pigs can read and write perfectly. They have made the majority of animals to believe that they are the most intelligent animals on the farm, so they should be in charge. Instead of Mr. Jones telling the animals what to do, the pigs make the decisions. All the animals are happy because they get to live their lives without the humans. The animals work for the pigs without questioning their authority. They are happy because the pigs watch as the hard working animals (like boxer for example) does all the work. Boxer now believes that Napoleon is always right, so he does whatever he wishes. Some animals decide to leave the farm (Molly for example), but most animals have stayed loyal to the farm and put forward a lot of hard work and dedication.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Farm

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the novel, the pigs manipulate their superiority towards other animals using trickery and education to justify their behavior and actions. Based on the rationale that the pigs were the self-proclaimed “brains of the farm”, they thought they had the right to reside inside the farmhouse. Despite the skepticism of the other animals, Squealer manages to persuade them that everything they were doing was within the constitution that they had set forth. The original constitution explicitly stated that “no animal shall sleep in a bed”, however the pigs unbenounced to the other animals changed the rule to “no animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets”. In addition to that, it was also stated that Napoleon, who was now known as the leader, deserved nothing less than the farmhouse as a residence. Some of the animals were totally convinced by Squealer's justification of their actions. Upon hearing what Squealer had to say, Boxer adopted the motto “Napoleon is always right” , showing his lack of understanding to what was going on. He is so caught up in following Napoleon and listening to what Squealer had to say that he can no longer understand that he is being manipulated and controlled by them. Boxer also doesn’t realize that what was going on was truly not better than prior to the revolution. His repetition of this phrase paired with his unparalleled work ethic show his misplaced loyalty towards Napoleon and his ways. Others however, were surprised to hear that Napoleon was using the farmhouse kitchen as a dining room and the drawing room as a recreation room. Animals such as Clover questioned what they were told. Her doubt was partially dissolved, however, when she learned that the constitution actually allowed for sleeping in a bed without sheets. This displays the trickery and misleading nature of the pigs by taking advantage of the illiteracy of the other animals. The animals had no way to remember exactly what the commandments on the wall said,…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays