Preview

Dimakuchi

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
984 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dimakuchi
Workmen Of Dimakuchi Tea Estate V. The Management Of Dimakuchi Tea Estate ... on 4 February, 1958
CITATION: 1958 AIR 353 1958 SCR 1156
WORKMEN OF DIMAKUCHI TEA ESTATE……. PETITIONER:
Vs.
THE MANAGEMENT OF DIMAKUCHITEA ESTATE……. RESPONDENT:
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/1958
BENCH:
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ), DAS, S.K., SARKAR, A.K.
FACTS OF THE CASE
Dr. K. P. Banerjee was appointed assistant medical officer of the Dimakuchi tea estate subject to a satisfactory medical report and on probation for three months where his suitability for permanent employment would be considered else would receive seven days' notice in writing terminating his appointment and if he was found guilty of misconduct, he was liable to instant dismissal. He received a letter from the manager of the tea estate stating that his services were terminated but he would receive one month’s salary in lieu of notice.

He was told that the reasons were mainly medical and misrepresenting of the last medical indent. The manager of the Dimakuchi tea estate said that the Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Cox had found that Dr. Banerjee was incompetent without sufficient knowledge. He administered a faulty Quinine injection to one of the assistants working there that almost led to the paralysis of his leg.

There were unsuccessful conciliation proceedings over the same and finally the matter was referred to the tripartite Appellate Board. This Board recommended that Dr. Banerjee should be reinstated with effect from the date of his discharge. In the meantime Dr. K. P. Banerjee received a sum of Rs. 30610 from the respondents and left the tea garden in question.

However the government felt that the case should be referred for adjudication to a Tribunal constituted under Section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The case referred under Section 10(1) (c) gave rise to two main issues:

· Whether the management of Dimakuchi Tea Estate was justified in dismissing Dr. K. P. Banerjee?
· If not, is he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although happened 2 years ago, the case remained controversial till today. People argue whether the nurse is liable for the patient’s death, what should have been done in the future and etc.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the claim against the newly qualified doctor, here it is purely Negligence or ''Medical Negligence'' from the doctor who examined him at first. Bertram can take the doctor to the civil court for compensation.…

    • 922 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. The Defendant was at all relevant times responsible for the management control, and administration of Friends Health NHS Foundation Trust, and for the employment of doctors, nurses, and other medical specialist s including emergency medicine, radiology and orthopaedic surgeons at and for the purpose of the said hospital.…

    • 3542 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whilst referring their very own patients to a laboratory, the physician and his colleagues violated the False Claims Act (FCA) and the Physician Self-Referral Law because they formulating a dummy corporation in a means of deceiving its patients and the government.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case before us is interesting on several aspects. One, the patient is a minor who was treated for 3 days, successfully, before his parents could be contacted. Most importantly, this case is interesting because the causative agent was ultimately found to be a toothpick, identification of which was very difficult because a toothpick does not show on standard diagnostic imaging techniques such as MRI and CT scans. The patient’s family has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against the hospital. For malpractice to occur there are 4 conditions that must be met. The plantiff will have to show that Dr. Foreman had a duty to his patient. They need to show that Dr. Foreman breached his duty to that patient. They need to show that his breach of duty caused injury to his patient and lastly, they need to show what damages were incurred as a result of this breach of duty. I will prove why Dr. Foreman is…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Helling V. Carey

    • 4538 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Rarely any physician intends to harm patients when he or she provides treatment to them. Patients see physicians and specialists in full faith that they will get help with a condition. What complicates the patient-doctor relationship is that the outcome of each patient’s treatment is different because of individual health conditions and the course of treatment chosen by the doctor. Problems arise when a patient is not satisfied with care provided by the doctor or in extreme cases when a patient dies. Since most of the time it is hard to clearly determine whether the outcome was solely a result of the course of treatment chosen by the doctor or whether other factors played a role too, quite often patients take their grievances to court to seek justice. What makes these kind of cases complicated is the “What would have been if…?” scenarios where one can only guess what the outcome of the treatment would have been had a different course of treatment been chosen because the proximate causes of injuries are not easy to determine.…

    • 4538 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In addition, the paper will list the four elements of negligence; duty of care, breach of duty, injury and causation will be analyze each and how they affect physician/hospital- patient relationship. The paper will briefly discuss the functions and responsibilities of the governing board of a healthcare corporation.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order for a patient to succeed in a claim for clinical negligence against his doctor, he must be able to satisfy three requirements: first, he must establish that a duty of care was owed by the doctor or hospital to himself; second, he must prove that the doctor has breached that duty of care by failing to reach the standard of care required by the law; lastly, the patient must prove that his injury was caused by the doctor’s negligent act. Each of these requirements for negligence will be considered as the strict requirements for a successful claim of the patient suffering from an adverse event in a medical context. These steps were referred by Charles Foster as the…

    • 4491 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Evidence Rule

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Administrative Law, Trimester 2, 2012 Assignment Question „[The] statutory “no evidence” ground of judicial review is both wider and more specific than was the case with “no evidence” grounds for judicial review at common law.‟ Justice Kirby, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] 210 CLR 222, at [111]. Of the judgments in Rajamanikkam, which do you prefer, and what justification can you provide for your preference? In answering the question, you should read the following three prescribed cases. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam (2002) 210 CLR 222 Television Capricornia Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1986) 13 FCR 511 SGFB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) FCAFC 422 You may, however, also choose to read the following supplementary reading. The supplementary reading consists of the following three cases. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Sunchen Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) FCA 21 The supplementary reading also consists of the following article. Andrew Pinchin, ‘No Evidence’ and ‘Mistake of Fact’: A Reconsideration (2007) 55 AIAL Forum 59-85 This supplementary reading might assist your understanding, but students will not be penalised for not referring to it, nor rewarded for referring to it. The focus should be on the prescribed reading for the assignment. As this is a reflective and not a research essay, you should not refer to material outside the prescribed and supplementary reading. You should follow the advice below, but also the advice given in the Study Guide on the assignment. Note especially the reference to penalties if the 1500 word limit is exceeded. You should also follow any further advice on the question provided in lecture notes. Some advice on the assignment The question requires students to reflect on primary material, rather than merely…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence is an issue which should never be tolerated when handling the welfare of patients. There have claims of negligence leading to serious jeopardy of patient…

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shortly thereafter, he submitted his resignation as Chief Financial Controller. He also immediately informed the college that he had attended and never graduated of what had happened. MB had lied to management and staff for five years and nobody knew that he did not finish his…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Failures to obtain consent from the patients were a failure of the physicians and conducting the…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law : Causation

    • 975 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The casualty doctor owed a duty of care and was in breach of his duty as he did not examine the patient, however, the court held that the doctor should not be liable to pay compensation as there was evidence that even if the doctor had not been negligent and had admitted the claimants husband to hospital he would have died of the arsenic poisoning, thus conveying the fundamental rule of factual causation.…

    • 975 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He should not be terminated for having falsified his housing receipts. Barbara Weston can give a private condemn to Mutambara that is telling him and explaining what wrongs he had…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Salomon V Salomon

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In January 2010, Salman, who owned a vacant bungalow lot, agreed to sell it to Maryam for RM300,000. The transfer of the lot was to be completed by the end March 2010. Last week, Salman, discovered that other lands in the vicinity of his lot were fetching much higher prices and changed his mind about selling the lot to Maryam. He proceeded to set up a company, Tatipu Sdn Bhd (the company), of which he was the majority shareholder and managing director. His wife, who is also a director, is the only other shareholder of the company. He then transferred the bungalow lot to the company.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays