Preview

Differential Association

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3140 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differential Association
Sutherland 's Differential Association Born August 13, 1883 in Gibbon, Nebraska, Edwin H. Sutherland grew up and studied in Ottawa, Kansas, and Grand Island, Nebraska. After receiving his B.A degree from Grand Island College in 1904, he taught Latin, Greek, History, and shorthand for two years at Sioux Falls College in South Dakota. In 1906 he left Sioux Falls College and entered graduate school at the University of Chicago from which he received his doctorate. (Gaylord, 1988:7-12) While attending the University of Chicago he changed his major from history to sociology. Much of his study was influenced by the Chicago approach to the study of crime that emphasized human behavior as determined by social and physical environmental factors, rather than genetic or personal characteristics. (Gaylord, 1988:7-12)
With his studies completed he began work at the University of Minnesota from 1926 to 1929 where his reputation as a leading criminologist was enhanced. At this time, his focus became sociology as a scientific enterprise whose goal was the understanding and control of social problems, including crime. (Gaylord, 1988:13) After his time at Minnesota he moved to Indiana University and founded the Bloomington School of Criminology at Indiana University. While at Indiana, he published 3 books, including Twenty Thousand Homeless Men (1936), The Professional Thief (1937), and the third edition of Principles of Criminology (1939). Finally in 1939 he was elected president of the American Sociological Society, and in 1940 was elected president of the Sociological Research Association. Similar in importance to strain theory and social control theory, Differential Association theory was Sutherland 's major sociological contribution to criminology; . These theories all explain deviance in terms of the individual 's social relationships.
By attributing the cause of crime to the social context of individuals, Differential Association departs from the pathological



Cited: Akers, Ronald L.. (1996). Is differential association/social learning cultural deviance theory? Criminology. Gaylord, Mark S and John F. Galliher. (1988). The criminology of Edwin Sutherland. Transaction, Inc Jacoby, Joseph E. Matseuda, Ross L.. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime and Delinquency (July 1988). Sage Publication Pfohl, Stephen Skinner, William F. and Anne M. Fream(1997). A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college student. Journal of research in crime and delinquency. Sage Publication Sutherland, Edwin H. Sutherland, Edwin H.. (1961). White-collar crime. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc Sutherland, Edwin H. Tittle, Charles R. and Mary Jean Burke(1986). Modeling Sutherland 's theory of differential association: Toward an empirical clarification. Social Forces. Warr, Mark (1993). Parents, Peers, and Delinquency. Social forces.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In support of this theory, Edwin Sutherland, a criminologist in 1939 introduced differential association theory of deviance – in which he identified 3 factors, which determine deviance.…

    • 6242 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper explores how Differential Association Theory, Techniques of Neutralization and the Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory explain deviance in the crimes of larceny and murder. These theories have intertwining perspectives on why individuals partake in criminal behaviors such as theft and homicide. The Differential Association Theory acknowledges that criminal behavior is learned and not hereditary, Techniques of Neutralization expands on the idea that individuals lack responsibility for their actions and Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory states four components influence the social bond: attachment, commitment, involvement and moral beliefs.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Differential Reinforcement

    • 2763 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Differential Reinforcement is defined to occur when behavior is reinforced by being either rewarded or punished while interacting with others (Siegel, 2003). With this said, the theory was developed as a way of labeling both positive, as well as negative aspects of individual action. This idea of reinforcement is a branch of the infamous Differential Association theory presented by Edwin H. Sutherland in 1939. Another commonly used term for this theory of reinforcement is called differential conditioning (Siegel, 2003). As mentioned, the types of reinforcement are either positive or negative, and operate on the results of specific crimes or random acts. Rewarding behaviors plainly urges such action to be repeated, while punishment often deters those offenders from repeating their same mistakes. Parenting practices, social groups, schools, television, and the community are just a few of the examples that are linked to this theory. According to Ronald Akers (1966), each behavior a person commits is a learned behavior, meaning some type of outside force paved the way to this various knowledge. This theory goes hand in hand with the ideology that he argued in his studies, but focuses on the after effects (or results), rather than prevention or control. This theory does not help support the effectiveness of deterrence, but it does give us a little insight on why people decide to engage in criminal activity. Perhaps the most influential group in shaping someone's behavior is their peer group. Take for example, gang activity. Street gangs, though usually found in highly urbanized areas, still exist and even thrive throughout most of the United States. It is the safety, security, and power that effects these members with faulty, risky and distant thinking, which usually ends up in some type of negative reinforcement. Guilt is often by association, as well as socialization. Purely, this relationship dominates the theory of crime as a learned behavior. No one…

    • 2763 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differential Association was designed by Ewin Sutherland and his theory can mostly be demonstrated through interaction with others, individuals learn the values, attitudes, techniques, and motives for criminal behavior. Ewin Sutherland also states that individual conducts when regarding differential association, people learn the same in criminal behavior as they do in other types of actions as can be non-criminal attitudes as well. Differential association is a leaned behavior that develops over time and one’s surroundings. Environment surroundings have a major influence in your daily life and who is in it. Learning theories stand in contrast to theories which argue that social class, broken homes, race, age among other valuables lead to crime.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Differential Association Theory was introduced by Edwin Sutherland, arguably one of the most influential criminologists of the twentieth century. His theory of differential association was brought about in 1947. It evolved from the Chicago School of sociology which observed an increase in crime from areas lacking social organisation and social control (Peters, 2008). Crime was explained by factors such as age, social class, race and geographical location. The theory proposes that through interacting with others, an individual will begin to learn the values, attitudes and motives for delinquent or criminal behaviour. Sutherland, (1947) believed that individuals are more likely to become involved in crime if…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the theories of Criminology is the Integrated theories of crime, it represents an attempt to bridge the ideological differences that exist among various older theories of crime by integrating variables from disparate theoretical approaches. By integrating a variety of ecological, socialization, psychological, biological, and economic factors into a coherent structure, such theories overcome the shortcomings of older theories that may be criticized on the grounds of reductionism. One way one can aproach this through analizing crime by the reasoning behind it, such as the way a subject may have grown up in a abusive home which led the subject to later in life adopt the same behavior.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociological theories of crime contain a great deal of useful information in the understanding of criminal behavior. Sociological theories are very useful in the study of criminal behavior because unlike psychological and biological theories they are mostly macro level theories which attempt to explain rates of crime for a group or an area rather than explaining why an individual committed a crime. (Kubrin, 2012). There is however some micro level sociological theories of crime that attempts to explain the individual’s motivation for criminal behavior (Kubrin, 2012). Of the contemporary sociological theories there are three which come to the forefront and which we will examine, social conflict theory, social disorganization theory, and rational choice theory.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is the theory in which “criminality is learned from observations of definitions favorable to law violation. Basically, criminal behavior is a factor of socialization, meaning that these prisoners exhibit criminal behaviors because of the learned interactions with criminals and criminal activity. This theory is emphasis interactions with groups in prison and learning different beliefs about their behaviors. Woman in prison learn motives and techniques for specific behaviors, depending on with whom they interact- their differential associations. A prison groups may differ in whether they view a behavior as deviant or not. This theory suggest that people in prison act deviant when they feel encouraging about violating norms then adhering to them. These prison woman use the “neutralizing beliefs” to reduce the apparent disapproval of the deviant behavior. In this show you definitely see the modification of differential association’s theory with regards to the positive and negative reinforcements that influence the gaining of…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crimes are committed by people from all walks of life from the poor inner city youth to the rich white collar criminal. No class is safe from crimes. From the jock drinking with his buddies without his parents’ knowledge to the outcasts smoking cigarettes in the school bathrooms to drug dealers on the corner making deals, deviant behavior is all-encompassing. Therefore, while I feel that no one theory explains every angle of deviant behavior, I find that differential association/social learning theories best explains how criminal behavior is learned, perpetuated, and found in all social…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Differential Association

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Differential Association theory it the theory that focuses on why people commit crimes. There are several reasons for a person to commit crimes according this theory. The general idea of differential association theory of criminology is that crime is a behavior that is learned through interactions with peers and family, or associations. The primary aspect of differential association theory is that delinquency is a learned behavior. Early explanations of crime focused on the individual, such as biological traits, personalities, or the idea of the born criminal. (Differential association theory, 2011)…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory that I have chosen to discuss is social disorganization theory and the differential-association theory. Social disorganization theory is when a person’s physical and social environments are primarily responsible for the behavioral choices that a person makes. It is a criminological theory attributing variation in crime and delinquency over time and among territories to the absence or breakdown of communal institutions such as family, school, church or local government and communal relationships that traditionally encouraged cooperative relationships among people. For example, a neighbor that has fraying social structures is more likely to have high crime rates. This neighborhood may have poor schools in the area, vacant and vandalized buildings, high unemployment, and a mix of commercial and residential property.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    criminal

    • 355 Words
    • 1 Page

    As we have seen throughout this chapter, most criminological theories posit a cause of crime.90 Some theories, however, focus less on causes than on constraints—those forces that keep people from committing a crime. These theories are called restraint theories. However, since they focus primarily on why people do not break the law, restraint theories provide only half of the causal picture. They are especially weak in identifying the social-structural sources of motivations to commit crimes.91 Also, the ways in which bonds with different in- stitutions interact with one another and with personal attributes, as well as the variety of bonds that operate throughout the life cycle, have yet to be clarified.However, differential association theory fails to explain why people have the associations they do and why some associations affect certain individuals more than others. Why, for ex- ample, are most prison guards unaffected by their constant association with offenders, while a few take advantage of their position to smuggle contraband? The theory has also been crit- icized for being so general and imprecise as to allow for little testing.88 Complete testing of the theory would require that all of the associations a person has ever had be recorded and analyzed from the standpoint of the individual—a clearly impossible task. Other theorists continue to build on Sutherland’s early work. Robert Burgess and Ronald Akers, for example, have constructed a differential association–reinforcement theory that seeks to integrate Sutherland’s original propositions with the work of American psycholo- gist B. F. Skinner’s work on conditioning.89 Burgess and Akers suggest that although values and behavior patterns are learned in association with others, the primary mechanism through which such learning occurs is operant conditioning. Reinforcement is the key, they say, to understanding any social learning as it takes place. The name social learning theory has been widely applied to…

    • 355 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marsh, I., Melville G., Norris G., Morgan K., Walkington, Z. (2006). Theories of Crime. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd. P125.…

    • 2514 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    The history and theory texts trace the origins of the discipline of criminology, to the first half of the nineteenth century (McGuire, 2004, p.1). Earlier, on the eighteenth century and specifically during the period of European Enlightenment, many thoughts and established patterns have been re-examined so that moral religious and mystical theories or ideas are balanced with scientific. After that a school of…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Differential association theory is an ideology that explains people’s criminal behavior or activities. It posits that people learn values, behavioral characteristics, techniques and motives for criminal behavior from their association…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics