Different Perspectives on the Practice of Leadership
Matthew R. Fairholm
University of South Dakota
Different Perspectives on the Practice of Leadership
Public administrators need not only practical and intellectual permission to exercise leadership, but also a practical and intellectual understanding of what leadership actually is. Much has emerged in the public administration literature and practice about the need for and legitimacy of public managers exerting leadership in their work, complementing the traditional functions of organizational management and policy implementation. Calling on the experiences and ideas of practitioners, this article offers an empirical understanding—both descriptive and prescriptive— of what leadership actually looks like as it is practiced by public managers. It uncovers five leadership perspectives (ranging from leadership as equivalent to scientific management, to leadership being a whole-soul or spiritual endeavor) held by public managers and discusses their implications for public administration. It legitimizes the notion that leadership is a crucial part of public administration and offers public managers the chance to improve or enhance those legitimate leadership activities.
Public administrators not only need practical and intellectual permission to exercise leadership, they need practical and intellectual understanding of what leadership actually is. Training public managers in the skills and techniques of leadership and management has become a major part of public human resource efforts (Day 2000;
Sims 2002; Rainey and Kellough 2000; Ink 2000; Pynes
2003). Articles and essays have surfaced in the literature about the need for and legitimacy of public managers exerting leadership in their work, complementing the traditional functions of organizational management and policy and program implementation. Books have emerged to lend more specificity to the topic of leadership in the public sector. Still, in the face of technicism, strict policy
University of South Dakota
Different Perspectives on the Practice of Leadership
Public administrators need not only practical and intellectual permission to exercise leadership, but also a practical and intellectual understanding of what leadership actually is. Much has emerged in the public administration literature and practice about the need for and legitimacy of public managers exerting leadership in their work, complementing the traditional functions of organizational management and policy implementation. Calling on the experiences and ideas of practitioners, this article offers an empirical understanding—both descriptive and prescriptive— of what leadership actually looks like as it is practiced by public managers. It uncovers five leadership perspectives (ranging from leadership as equivalent to scientific management, to leadership being a whole-soul or spiritual endeavor) held by public managers and discusses their implications for public administration. It legitimizes the notion that leadership is a crucial part of public administration and offers public managers the chance to improve or enhance those legitimate leadership activities.
Public administrators not only need practical and intellectual permission to exercise leadership, they need practical and intellectual understanding of what leadership actually is. Training public managers in the skills and techniques of leadership and management has become a major part of public human resource efforts (Day 2000;
Sims 2002; Rainey and Kellough 2000; Ink 2000; Pynes
2003). Articles and essays have surfaced in the literature about the need for and legitimacy of public managers exerting leadership in their work, complementing the traditional functions of organizational management and policy and program implementation. Books have emerged to lend more specificity to the topic of leadership in the public sector. Still, in the face of technicism, strict policy
References: and self-led followers (Burns 1978; Kotter 1990; Taylor 1915; Urwick 1944; Zaleznik 1977; Ackerman 1985; Rosener 1990). threaten the endeavor (CEMM 1996). See also Wimberley and Rubens (2002) for more on leadership development programs through partnerships. Ackerman, Leonard. 1985. Leadership vs. Managership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 6(2): 17–19. Barker, Joel. 1992. Future Edge: Discovering the New Paradigms of Success Barnard, Chester. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Behn, Robert. 1998. What Right Do Public Managers Have to Lead? Public Administration Review 58(3): 209–25. Bennis, Warren. 1984. Where Have All the Leaders Gone? In Contemporary Issues in Leadership, 2nd ed., edited by William E ———. 1993. An Invented Life: Reflections on Leadership and Change Burns, James MacGregor. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper and Row. Carson, Clayborne. 1987. Martin Luther King, Jr.: Charismatic Leadership in a Mass Struggle Center for Excellence in Municipal Management (CEMM). 1996. Day, David. 2000. Leadership Development: A Review in Context. Leadership Quarterly 11(4): 581–611. Deming, W. Edwards. 1986. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced DePree, Max. 1992. Leadership Jazz. New York: Dell. Fairholm, Gilbert. 1991. Values Leadership: Toward a New Philosophy of Leadership. New York: Praeger. ———. 1998. Perspectives on Leadership: From the Science of Management to Its Spiritual Heart ———. 2001. Mastering Inner Leadership. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Fairholm, Matthew. 2002. Leading from the Middle: The Power and Influence of Middle Leaders Follett, Mary Parker. 1918. The New State: Group Organization—The Solution of Popular Government. Edited by Benjamin R. Barber and Jane Mansbridge. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press, 1998. Frederickson, H. George. 1997. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Goleman, Daniel. 1995. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books. Graves, Clare. 1970. Levels of Existence: An Open Systems Theory of Values Greenleaf, Robert. 1977. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness Gulick, Luther. 1937. Notes on the Theory of Organization. In Papers on the Science of Administration, edited by Luther Harman, Willis. 1998. Global Mind Change: The Promise of the 21st Century Hart, David. 1984. The Virtuous Citizen, the Honorable Bureaucrat, and “Public” Administration. Public Administration Review 44(Special Issue): 111–20. Heifetz, Ronald. 1994. Leadership without Easy Answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Hersey, Paul, and Kenneth Blanchard. 1979. Life Cycle Theory of Leadership Herzberg, Frederick. 1984. Mystery Systems Shape Loyalties. Hofstede, Geert. 1993. Cultural Constraints in Management Theories Ink, Dwight. 2000. What Was Behind the 1978 Civil Service Reform? In The Future of Merit, edited by James Pffifner Juran, J. 1989. Juran on Leadership for Quality: An Executive Handbook Koestler, Arthur. 1970. Beyond Atomism and Holism—The Concept of Holon Kotter, John. 1990. What Leaders Really Do. Harvard Business Review 68(3): 103–11. Kouzes, James, and Barry Posner. 1990. The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Marini, Frank. 1971. Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective McSwite, O.C. 1997. Legitimacy in Public Administration: A Discourse Analysis McWhinney, Will. 1984. Alternative Realities: Their Impact on