Preview

Differences Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
378 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists
When the Constitution of the United States was originally created, it did not contain a Bill of Rights. In the Constitutional Convention, the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights was not necessary. Opposingly, the Anti-Federalists argued that the central government had too much power and that our Constitution needed a Bill of Rights that would explicitly state the rights of the citizens. In order to settle disputes between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists that claimed the government had an imbalance of power, the Bill of Rights was created. Containing the first ten Amendments, the Bill of Rights ultimately split up the powers and gave specific duties to the separate branches to create balance in power between the state and central

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The U.S Constitution did not contain the freedoms that are now outlined in the Bill of Rights, when it was signed on Sept. 17, 1787. The issue of a listing of rights that couldn’t be violated upon by the stronger and new national government became the center of ratification…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They are multiple between federalist and Democratic-Republicans. They are Differences Between the First Political Parties. Some of the differences between federalist and Democratic-Republicans is that federalist leader is Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans leader is Thomas Jefferson. The federalist has an alliance with British and the Democratic-Republicans has an alliance with French. Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson always disagreed on many things.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are similarities and differences between Thomas Paine’s Common Sense and the Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist controversy explores the views of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the Constitution, and they wanted the Constitution to become law or ratified. Moreover, the Federalists wanted and believed in a strong, central government. The Federalists consisted of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. On the other side, there were opponents of the Constitution (the Anti-Federalists). The Anti-Federalists thought the Constitution would give the government too much power and control; there was no Bill of Rights to protect the people and their rights from…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation Of Powers Dbq

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At first, some of the first people in America didn’t want to have a federal government that had too much power. The Founding Fathers created the Constitution of the United States of America after the Articles of Confederation failed. There are numerous documents in the Constitution that limit the federal government in many ways. For example there is a system called Checks and Balances that gives certain powers to each branch. In the United States, there is something called the Separation of Powers which also limits the federal government. It keeps one branch of government from becoming too powerful against the other branches. Furthermore, the Bill of Rights also limits the federal government. Also known as the first ten additions or amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights protect individual liberties. As you can…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans are very different in the way they think and act. Federalists had a strong federal government and were ruled by a wealthy class while the Democratic republicans had a strong state government and were ruled by people…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists thought that stronger federal government was needed because at the time, the government was carrying significant amount of financial problems and also having trouble to deal with aggressive actions of other countries. They believed that the nation may not survive without having stronger national government and that separating the basic powers of governments into states will fail the unity as one nation.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What's the difference between a Federalist and an Anti-federalist? Why did they have different perspectives on the ratification of the Constitution? Republicans and Democrats are not the original political parties. As i'm getting older i will be eligible to vote at the age 18, I will know the difference between the two. The Political parties had changed over the year where now the rules are way different back then.…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Federalists; John Day, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and James Madison, were supporters of the constitution. They believed that our nation needed a strong federal government. The reasoning behind their belief was because they found it was necessary that a strong federal government be made for the entire country. As said in the Federalist Paper number it mentions the idea of checks and balances which would prevent one branch from growing too strong and it would limit the governments power.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Articles of Confederation it was seen necessary to repeal the Articles and create one that is perfect for everyone in the country, but it wasn’t that easy. Federalists claimed that we needed a strong central government to prevent rebellions such as Shay’s Rebellion that damaged the states while the Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government could turn into a kingdom like U.K. which they have fought and damaged deeply, recently. In different topics such as Congress, Executive, Judicial and whether we needed to have Bill of Rights or not, both parties debated and found solutions that still after hundreds of years works……

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Americans sorted through what kind of country they were going to be various opposite sided viewpoints would help shape our nation in how we interpret the constitution, how we vote, and how we dealt with foreign affairs. The federalists and the democratic-republicans became the origin of a two-party political system in the United States. The two parties varied drastically not just in their policies but also in who were being represented in these groups. On the federalist end we have merchants, bankers, the mostly educated classes of people contrastingly on the republican side we have the artisans, the farmers, and mostly ill-educated folk. The two sides disagreed on most matters mainly regarding the interpretation of the constitution,…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both sides had strong opinions and beliefs on the subject, but the side that I thought was more convincing was the Federalists side. I think the Federalists were right when they said America was in need of a stronger national government. If our government were to become weak, like the Anti-Federalists wanted, then our world would become a chaotic mess, the rules wouldn’t apply to everyone. I think that you need to have rules and laws to keep people in check, if we didn’t have them then everyone and everything would become crazy.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After creating the Articles of Confederation, the representatives of each state agreed to make a new, better form of government, the U.S. Constitution. When creating a constitution for our nations, certain citizens wanted to guarantee that there would be a Bill of Rights included in it. These people were called the antifederalist, and they wanted a Bill of Rights to assure that their individual rights would not be taken out of their possession.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays