Difference Between Richard Rumelt's Good Strategy: The Difference And Why It Matters
Nobody could deny that leadership is nearly as old as humanity. We noticed some members of the society came up to leaders positions while others did not. Leadership is the heartbeat of any organization and the key to success. Leadership has been defined as an effective influence in the activity of a group and directing them toward the target seeking to achieve a particular goal. Leadership is to correct mistakes, support the team spirit and balance between personal goals and team goals. I believe that leadership is the behavior of the leader that helps his group to achieve specific goals while guiding them towards achieving these goals. Simply, it is the ability of the leader to influence the group in various levels. Big difference between
…show more content…
A successful strategy development is a hypothesis process based on preparatory knowledge within the organization. Strategy making is based on three aspects: diagnoses the problem that has primary impact on the strategic success. The second aspect is to identify coherent policies in order to attack the problem. The third is taking proper actions in order to go along with policies for eliminate the problem. Strategy is not about setting a goal and follow on to achieve it. Rumelt insists on leaders must think through a hypothetical process about a strategy that able to achieve organizational success. In addition leaders have to assess the strengths and the weakness of the organization. Leaders have to understand themselves to avoid distraction and bias in order to make difficult decision in order to achieve mission success. Leader should be the decision-maker, responsible of taking wise decisions. Decision-making is the key success to leadership, leaders should practice to take decisions in order to learn from past experiences so they can develop this
A successful strategy development is a hypothesis process based on preparatory knowledge within the organization. Strategy making is based on three aspects: diagnoses the problem that has primary impact on the strategic success. The second aspect is to identify coherent policies in order to attack the problem. The third is taking proper actions in order to go along with policies for eliminate the problem. Strategy is not about setting a goal and follow on to achieve it. Rumelt insists on leaders must think through a hypothetical process about a strategy that able to achieve organizational success. In addition leaders have to assess the strengths and the weakness of the organization. Leaders have to understand themselves to avoid distraction and bias in order to make difficult decision in order to achieve mission success. Leader should be the decision-maker, responsible of taking wise decisions. Decision-making is the key success to leadership, leaders should practice to take decisions in order to learn from past experiences so they can develop this