Preview

Difference Between International Relations And Security

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between International Relations And Security
Module International Relations and Security comprise of several topics that centered on relation between two or more countries and security aspect within the relations. There are several approaches which define the disposition towards world affairs which can be analyzed in all historical periods such as idealism, realisms and interdependence. Idealism can be defined particularly in two ways which are broad and narrow in professional study. Idealism can be said as an optimistic doctrine which seeks to go beyond the international anarchy which create more modern and harmonious world order and it is highly influenced by League of Nations of Woodrow Wilson in 1917.The constraint on politics which imposed by human nature and the absence of international …show more content…
The breach of International law may lead to severe implication to the world such as wars, conflict, disarmament, International terrorism, and trafficking in arms, persons and drugs. So it is crucial for all states to obey International law to avoid sanction. We also discuss treaty making process and how Malaysia Constitutional Framework on International Law and treaties. As I understand although Malaysia also signed a number of treaties still it must comply with doctrine of transformation and it is exclusive domain of federal …show more content…
We also ready to compromise, as long as harmony is preserved and win-win attitude already incorporated in Malaysian way of life. Malaysia need to learn more in order to improve negotiation skill especially from our neighboring country, Singapore where they adopted a business-like approach and always like to package it deals. They are very professional in its preparation, during and after where top person attends the negotiation, write the report directly after the negotiation ends and only certain individual speak during the negotiation and it prove effective in their own
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    syllabus of psci104
    • 1300 Words
    • 8 Pages

    syllabus of psci104

    International politics is about conflicts and cooperation over the distribution of limited resources among nation-states and non-state actors who aim to maximize their welfare (i.e. security, wealth, etc.). The course is divided into three parts. 1) Actors and concepts in international relations: the first part of the course will focus on the major theoretical approaches to international politics, state and non-state actors and their roles in international politics. 2) International security: the main themes in the second part of the course include the causes of war and peace, international cooperation, alliances, deterrence, nuclear proliferation, etc. 3) International political economy: the last part involves international trade, globalization, and economic development in the less-developing countries. The course is designed to achieve the following objectives: I) to provide students an introduction to and a general familiarity with the concepts and analytical tools used in the study of international relations; II) to introduce students to the major debates and issues in international relations; and III) to promote the ability of…

    • 1300 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    WK 5 Assignment
    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    WK 5 Assignment

    The International Relations theory that best fits the Gini-out-of-the-bottle approach for this report is the theory of realism. There are five different classes of realism but the two that stands out to me are classic and neorealism. Classic realism leans towards those that represent a pessimistic view and the fact that people are not often what they appear to be and they it would behoove a government not to be so trusting of others. Neorealism represents the struggle of someone that is greedy for more such as power.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Woodrow Wilson
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson

    In this monograph, Woodrow Wilson greatly attempted to maintain peace before entering World War I. The reason Wilson established the League of Nations to passionately pursue this goal. Link emphasizes that the president even chased this…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations
    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    International Relations

    Buzan, B. 1997. Rethinking Security after the Cold War. Cooperation and Conflict. Vol. 32, No. 1: 5-28.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Significant Impact of Ww1
    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Significant Impact of Ww1

    The League of Nations. During and in the immediate aftermath of the ‘war to end all wars’ The creation of the League of Nations in 1919/20 acted as the deterrent to any future major conflict and as an organisation of nations for the purpose of guaranteeing political independence and territorial integrity to all nations. Morally and as is clearly evident in 1945 with the advent of its successor, the UN, one would struggle to justify challenging the League’s…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Global Politics Essays. Chapter 2.
    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Global Politics Essays. Chapter 2.

    Two theories dominated the early twentieth century’s view of world politics: liberalism and realism. The latter stresses the importance of the nation-state itself and security via national defense and strategic alliances; whereas the former believes that although nation-states are crucial, international institutes and global corporations are also pivotal to maintaining peace. While the two paradigms have many differences, some of the most important distinctions lie in their views on human nature and the significance of international institutions.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using Two Other Theories to Back Up Your Assertions Discuss the Extent to Which Realism Remains Central to International Relations Today.
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Using Two Other Theories to Back Up Your Assertions Discuss the Extent to Which Realism Remains Central to International Relations Today.

    The outlook that realism remains central to international relations today is based largely on the prospect that states are taking advantage of the anarchic setting constructed by the issue that there is no overriding world government that enforces a common code of rules for everyone to follow. This therefore means that actors in international politics are at liberty to act in any manner they believe is best for their own…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hitler's Responsibility of World War Ii
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hitler's Responsibility of World War Ii

    After the First World War, many collective security plans and appeasement policies were established by European nations- the League of Nations, the Stressa Front, etc… to ensure safety for the old powers, such as France or Britain, who felt insecure witnessing the rise in power of Germany, Italy, and Russia; however, the outbreak of World War II proved the weaknesses of the collective security, which were the most prominent cause to the failure of international diplomacy, and in addition to Germany’s aggression, led to the eventual outbreak of the Second World War. As an invention from the First World War, heavily supported by President Wilson of the United States, the League of Nations was formed in order to keep peace; however, the plan inevitably failed its purpose when the leading power of the world at the time, the United States, was occupied in her own domestic affairs and refused to enforce her proposals. Therefore, it is clearly observable how the League of Nations did not have the amount of power it requires to interfere in the events of violations, for example, the League of Nations did not take action when France takes over the Ruhr in 1923. Moreover, crisis in Ethiopia effectively portrayed the fears of the members that resulted in the failure of the League, as the weaker states felt indignant that they were not treated fairly by the larger powers, who only pursued to protect their own interests. While it is the “League of Nations”, it was not seen as a true global powner without an armed force; furthermore, many nations never joined, significantly the United States. Consequently, countries realized that international law was not respected, and aggressive states such as Italy, Germany and Japan had learnt that they still had the chance to overcome “international law.” In addition to the League’s lack of power, members had not adapted their foreign policy to change from a typical aim – only acting for their own self-interest, instead of looking after the…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Did the League of Nations Fail?
    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Did the League of Nations Fail?

    The main reasons that the League of Nations was originally set up was to prevent war, encourage disarmament and as a way to settle international disputes through negotiation and arbitration. As stated by Wilson, 'This treaty is nothing less than an organization of liberty and mercy for the world' (Foley 1969:129) The intentions of the League appealed to many countries, especially as they were still raw from the war and favourable towards pacifism. With the benefit of hind-sight it is easy to criticise the actions taken which led to the eventual failure of the League, however it is of much importance to establish the significance of the concepts that they initially determined. It is also essential to understand the different ways in which the whole ideology of democratic peace is perceived by idealists and in contrast realists, in order to evaluate and grasp the fundamental organisation of the League and varying perspectives on it's failure and on it's formation.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Internationalism
    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Internationalism

    Nation states always try to follow their own national interests for moving forward leaving to recognize internationalism. The only goal of nation states is following their national interest which gives them no chance for seeing the benefits of internationalism. Internationalism is all about global equality, it is based on the idea that cooperation between people and movements in different countries. Internationalism is an ideology that centres on the idea that cooperation among countries promotes common good for all in political, social and economic terms. Internationalism has progressed during the last years and is progressing at the same pace. Internationalism promotes peace and security, self-determination, economic stability and humanitarianism. Internationalism in past has helped in solving environmental issues very powerfully by bringing all nation states together and solving the issues. Internationalism makes the nation and states more connected by linking them towards a common goal and help the countries to pursue common interests. Internationalism makes the world a better place to live in. As each coin has two sides, Internationalism also has both good effects as well as bad effects. Nation states may have to sacrifice some of their national interests in order to make policy like Internationalism to function properly. As nation states do not want to sacrifice their national interest it may act as a barrier in the proper functioning of Internationalism. Internationalism can also sometimes lead nation states to lose their sovereignty. I have decided to support Earl Warren’s idea of internationalism and believe that internationalism is good for maintain peace and security, self-determination, economic stability in the world.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Idealism and Realism in International Relation
    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Idealism and Realism in International Relation

    Idealism in International Relations (For K. Dowding (ed.), Encyclopedia of Power, Sage 2011) In general parlance on international matters, idealism is a term applied to any idea, goal, or practice considered to be impractical. Thus eradicating nuclear weapons is considered idealistic, as is substituting open for secret diplomacy, entrusting international security to the UN, creating an African Union on the model of the EU, or the global eradication of poverty and injustice. The bases of such judgments are rarely made explicit, but they usually rest on a pessimistic reading of human nature along with an historical judgment on the difficulty of peaceably achieving radical change in world affairs.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Realism vs. Liberalism
    • 1438 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Realism vs. Liberalism

    “International politics, like all politics, is a struggle for power. Whatever the ultimate aims of international politics, power is always the immediate aim. Statesmen and peoples may ultimately seek freedom, security, prosperity, or power itself. They may define their goals in terms of a religious, philosophic, economic, or social ideal. They may hope that this ideal will materialize through its own inner force, through divine intervention, or through the natural development of human affairs. They may also try to further its realization through non-political means, such as technical co-operation with other nations or international organizations. But whenever they strive to realize their goal by means of international politics, they do so by striving for power.”2…

    • 1438 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Idealism vs Realism in International Relations
    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Idealism vs Realism in International Relations

    The international relations schools of thought known as Realism and Idealism identify specific and similar characteristics of actors in the conceptual development of their theories. While many of these characteristics can be generalized as being synonymous between the two theories, both theories make a separate distinction in what specifically constitutes an actor. In Realism, the term “actor” refers directly and solely to the state: a combination of government, leaders, decision-makers, etc, that act as a unitary entity to promote the interests of the state. Idealists however expand on what constitutes an actor to include both the state and people. Not only do the principles of Idealism assert that the state and people should be considered actors, in fact both they must be viewed as actors. Actors have interests; while realists such as Machiavelli insist the state is the only unit of analysis necessary in international politics, idealists argue that just as states have interests, people in government have interests as well.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparison of International Relations Theory
    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Comparison of International Relations Theory

    Contemporary international relations is a complex field. Understanding events and attempting to make sense of them can be a daunting task. There are, however, tools available, which can assist in providing clarity to these complex issues. The first of these tools is historic knowledge. Without historic background of an issue, it is nearly impossible to understand the events driving that issue in modern times. A second tool, the one which will be the focus of this paper, is international relations theory. Theory can be defined as “a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action,” (Merriam-Webster) and can be used “in many cases as a basis of prediction.” (Mingst 56) There are three major theories which we can use to analyze events: liberalism, realism, and constructivism. These theories provide us with different points of view from which to analyze issues in today’s world. By looking at events, both past and present, in the context of a given theory, we can begin to understand those events and the driving forces behind them, as well as to make predictions about future events.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What does it meant by International Relations
    • 3818 Words
    • 16 Pages

    What does it meant by International Relations

    the use of power among the states. International Relations is a process by which the…

    • 3818 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics