Preview

Diction In Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Diction In Julius Caesar
In act three, scene two from Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, the main character Julius Caesar, is presented as a paradoxical mix of good and bad. Through the use of diction, figurative language, and tone it creates the image of Caesar. Too some Caesar is good, but too others Caesar is dreadful. In scene two, from act three, the diction use creates a good and bad view of Caesar. At the beginning of the scene, Artemidorus insists that Caesar should read first the petition he has for him. Yet Caesar denies him and answers, “What touches us ourself shall be last served” (Act 3, scene 2, lines 17-18). The diction behind that illustrates Caesar as a good and bad person. He can be classified as good because by reading last what is at his fully …show more content…
The northern star is a star way high in the sky and it can never be moved. It remains in the sky above everybody. Caesar does this comparison two explain several things. First, he wants to illustrate his superiority among individuals and that it will be eternal. Second, he wants to confirm his stability. Also, Caesar’s comparison with the northern star demonstrates he wants to be seen and treated as a god. In addition, he states, “And men are flesh and blood, and apprehensive.” (Act3, scene 2, line 100). If one analyses this comparison carefully, Caesar does not say “we” he says “men”, showing that he feels like a god since they are spirits and not made by flesh and blood like humans. Furthermore, Caesar asks a rhetorical question, “Wilt thou lift up Olympus?” (Act 3, scene 2, line 108). Caesar associates him self to mount Olympus in order for the reader to acknowledge that his constancy is like a mountain. A mountain cannot be moved under any circumstances. Therefore Caesar cannot be moved under any circumstances. In addition, mount Olympus is the mountain of the gods, thus Caesar once again shows his desire of being a god figure. Caesar’s attitude conveys him as an evil person. The figurative language used in this scene is mostly metaphors and it creates both a fine and dreadful picture of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Works of literature often feature characters whose pride or selfishness creates problems. In William Shakespeare’s ‘’Julius Caesar’’, Caesar’s pride creates problems because it causes him to overlook the warnings signs that point him towards his demise. Thus Caesar’s experience with pride ultimately leads to his tragic demise.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Shakespeare’s ’Julius Caesar,’ what characters say and think about each other, has a significant impact on the ways in which they themselves, are…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the tragic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, inside shows multiple evidences of hidden examples of the use of imagery, tone and rhetorical devices. A small example of literature tools could be found inside of this short example from the play, it is enough to express all elements of literature to be found. Brutus discusses the impending future of Rome, if placed upon Julius Caesar’s hands, and attempts to be convincing of others to slay Julius with his rise of power, before he takes the crown, as Julius Caesar follows by his heart more than his brain, he deems Julius Caesar not worthy of taking control over Rome. The tone, imagery, and rhetorical devices used by Shakespeare inside of this small excerpt is supposed to be translated as to further the development of the plot, which all results back to how most of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pertains foreshadowing to a lot of chaos as a theme..…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This passage is, in a way, foreshadowing what may happen next. I believe that there will be a great amount of anger and hatred shown towards Julius Caesar as there already is. I can visualize that there may be some violence or feuds that will be revealed. I also have come to expect there may be changing loyalties towards Caesar, some may praise and cherish him as a superior and some may show extreme animosity.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Caesars death Antony requested to speak at his funeral. Antony was a very good friend of Caesar. In his eulogy, Antony denies accusations of Caesar being “too ambitious” and retorts with examples of how good of a man he really was in his eyes. Antony firmly believes Caesar was innocent and that his murder cannot be justified. He speaks to the Plebeians, the Roman people…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Caesars funeral two of his best men gave speeches, Antony and Brutus, they both used ethos, pathos and logos in different ways to win over the crowd. Brutus was in the senate so he was supposed to give great speeches with structure. Antony was a general so he was not as good at giving speeches but was good at pumping up his solders before battle. Which he used to his advantage when speaking to the mourning crowd.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every text is constructed for a purpose; the composer is trying to convey and embed their agenda into the reader by persuading them to accept their perspective on key events, personalities and/or situations. Through the manipulation of various textual forms, structures and language composers persuade their audience to adopt their perspective. Composers often decide to present conflicting perspectives to truly engage their audience. By demonstrating the concept of conflicting perspectives the composer is able to glorify their perspective in contrast to another to enforce their agenda, they position the audience through language to side with them. The tight narrative “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare’s utilises the final days of Caesar’s…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manipulation, in essence, is a timeless recurring theme not only in literature, but in our everyday life. William Shakespeare’s drama, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is saturated with rhetorical strategies. Brutus, Cassius, and Antony use their words throughout different parts of the play to sway other people’s opinions. Cassius’s persuasion is so powerful it leads to the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus is left with the repercussions of the assassination and has to speak to the Romans. Brutus and Antony go back-to-back speaking to the Romans using rhetorical strategies to explain their diverse views on the event. These three characters’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos was so compelling it persuaded the other people’s views, caused Caesar’s death,…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even in his absence or death, the manner in which characters address Caesar, describe him, and act in his presence, reveals the authority and influence he has over people's lives. From the first scene, Caesar is presented as victorious, having vanquished his rival, Pompey, and as an extremely popular figure among the people, with the commoners even defying authorities to celebrate his victory. As the play continues into scene ii, Caesar appears before the crowds as a modern-day pop-star, surrounded by a trail of subservient entourage. Casca and Antony display complete submission to Caesar, with the latter declaring that 'when Caesar says Do this! It is done' . In Caesar's absence, fellow patricians, Brutus and Cassius, describe him as 'mighty Caesar', a man who 'has now become a God', and strides in the world 'as a Colossus' . It is therefore evident that his close subordinates are jealously affected by his power, an effect which will later germinate into conspiracy. Even after his assassination, Caesar's ghost continues the task of perpetuating the fear of his everlasting power on those he influenced. Caesar holds enough power over his subjects that he is capable of influencing them continually, in his life and…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In act two scene two, Caesar receives word that the priests, upon performing a sacrifice, cannot find the sacrificed beast's heart. Caesar does not interpret this the way he should, which is to stay in his house away from threats, but instead thinks that “the gods do this in shame of cowardice.” Shortly afterward, Caesar reveals that wife Calphurnia saw his statue, “which, like a fountain with a hundred spouts, did run pure blood.” Caesar, under the sway of Decius, again misinterprets this bad omen to mean that his “statue spouting blood in so many pipes, in which so many smiling Romans bathed, signifies that from you great Rome shall suck reviving blood.” As Caesar is full of pride, he is constantly looking for signs of his superiority, and when Decius gives this interpretation, Caesar laps it up without a second thought. Caesar, who thinks himself immune to flattery, can be so easily flattered by anything that pertains to his pride. However, these mistakes are not enough to damn him. In the end, Caesar makes a fatal mistake by directly insulting the gods with the words “Hence! Wilt thou lift up Olympus?” Caesar implies that he is equal to the Olympians, and they, to teach him a lesson, send the senators to stab him. By including this line, Shakespeare provides…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Cesar

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Burton Raffel, an influential critic, writes “Julius Caesar is a relentlessly honest, profoundly moral portrait of the life of power, in which Shakespeare’s characters freely deceive both each other and themselves”. This statement is partially true, giving a person an abundant amount of power can corrupt their intentions. However, the exploitation of Caesar’s power was an exaggerated and dramatized version of the truth. Not every leader who is given authority craves to become an autocrat. Caesar was so hungry for power he was willing to lie to himself, and to the Roman people in order receive it. Eventually Caesar became so confident in himself that he would not listen to the warnings he was given, ultimately leading to his murder.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why do honorable people end up with a downfall for their achievements? William Shakespeare with his knowledge of human nature shows Brutus and Cassius’s behaviors as idealistic and realistic in one of his most tragic plays Julius Caesar. The main theme Shakespeare uses in the play is idealism v realism. Julius Caesar the new king of Rome possesses too much power; therefore, Cassius with his realistic views tries to lead people of Rome to decease Caesar’s leadership. Brutus, a good friend of Caesar, wants the welfare for Rome; however, the conspirators persuade Brutus to their site against powerful Caesar. Shakespeare shows several examples of Brutus being idealistic and Cassius very realistic. The example of Brutus’s idealistic side is when he declines to swear an oath. Another one is when Cassius wants to kill Antony but Brutus refuses because in his mind it is too bloody. The third mistake Brutus has done by letting Antony to speak on Caesar’s funeral. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses Brutus to show his readers that a tragic flaw can lead to a downfall.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays