developing management skills
OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 59, No. 2, March–April 2011, pp. 283–300 issn 0030-364X eissn 1526-5463 11 5902 0283
doi 10.1287/opre.1100.0855
© 2011 INFORMS
A Top-Down Approach to Multiname Credit
Kay Giesecke
Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, giesecke@stanford.edu Lisa R. Goldberg
MSCI Barra, Berkeley, California 94704, lisa.goldberg@mscibarra.com
Xiaowei Ding
Morgan Stanley, Purchase, New York 10577, xiaowei.ding@morganstanley.com
A multiname credit derivative is a security that is tied to an underlying portfolio of corporate bonds and has payoffs that depend on the loss due to default in the portfolio. The value of a multiname derivative depends on the distribution of portfolio loss at multiple horizons. Intensity-based models of the loss point process that are specified without reference to the portfolio constituents determine this distribution in terms of few economically meaningful parameters and lead to computationally tractable derivatives valuation problems. However, these models are silent about the portfolio constituent risks. They cannot be used to address applications that are based on the relationship between portfolio and component risks, for example, constituent risk hedging. This paper develops a method that extends these models to the constituents. We use random thinning to decompose the portfolio intensity into a sum of constituent intensities. We show that a thinning process, which allocates the portfolio intensity to constituents, uniquely exists, and is a probabilistic model for the next-to-default.
We derive a formula for the constituent default probability in terms of the thinning process and the portfolio intensity, and develop a semi-analytical transform approach to evaluate it. The formula leads to a calibration scheme for the thinning processes and an estimation scheme for constituent hedge sensitivities. An empirical analysis for September 2008
Vol. 59, No. 2, March–April 2011, pp. 283–300 issn 0030-364X eissn 1526-5463 11 5902 0283
doi 10.1287/opre.1100.0855
© 2011 INFORMS
A Top-Down Approach to Multiname Credit
Kay Giesecke
Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, giesecke@stanford.edu Lisa R. Goldberg
MSCI Barra, Berkeley, California 94704, lisa.goldberg@mscibarra.com
Xiaowei Ding
Morgan Stanley, Purchase, New York 10577, xiaowei.ding@morganstanley.com
A multiname credit derivative is a security that is tied to an underlying portfolio of corporate bonds and has payoffs that depend on the loss due to default in the portfolio. The value of a multiname derivative depends on the distribution of portfolio loss at multiple horizons. Intensity-based models of the loss point process that are specified without reference to the portfolio constituents determine this distribution in terms of few economically meaningful parameters and lead to computationally tractable derivatives valuation problems. However, these models are silent about the portfolio constituent risks. They cannot be used to address applications that are based on the relationship between portfolio and component risks, for example, constituent risk hedging. This paper develops a method that extends these models to the constituents. We use random thinning to decompose the portfolio intensity into a sum of constituent intensities. We show that a thinning process, which allocates the portfolio intensity to constituents, uniquely exists, and is a probabilistic model for the next-to-default.
We derive a formula for the constituent default probability in terms of the thinning process and the portfolio intensity, and develop a semi-analytical transform approach to evaluate it. The formula leads to a calibration scheme for the thinning processes and an estimation scheme for constituent hedge sensitivities. An empirical analysis for September 2008
References: Airault, H., H. Föllmer. 1974. Relative densities of semimartingales. Andersen, L., J. Sidenius. 2005. CDO pricing with factor models: Survey and comments Arnsdorf, M., I. Halperin. 2008. BSLP: Markovian bivariate spread-loss model for portfolio credit derivatives Brigo, D., A. Pallavicini, R. Torresetti. 2007. Calibration of CDO tranches with the dynamical generalized-Poisson loss model Chen, Z., P. Glasserman. 2008. Sensitivity estimates for portfolio credit derivatives using Monte Carlo Collin-Dufresne, P., R. Goldstein, J. Hugonnier. 2004. A general formula for the valuation of defaultable securities. Econometrica 72 1377–1407. Cont, R., Y. H. Kan. 2009. Dynamic hedging of portfolio credit derivatives. Working paper, Columbia University, New York. Cont, R., A. Minca. 2008. Extracting portfolio default rates from CDO spreads Daley, D., D. Vere-Jones. 2008. An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Vol Das, S., D. Duffie, N. Kapadia, L. Saita. 2007. Common failings: How corporate defaults are correlated Davis, M., V. Lo. 2001. Modeling default correlation in bond portfolios. Dellacherie, C., P.-A. Meyer. 1982. Probabilities and Potential. North Holland, Amsterdam. Ding, X., K. Giesecke, P. Tomecek. 2009. Time-changed birth processes and multiname credit derivatives Duffie, D., N. Garleanu. 2001. Risk and valuation of collateralized debt obligations Duffie, D., J. Pan, K. Singleton. 2000. Transform analysis and asset pricing for affine jump-diffusions Duffie, D., M. Schroder, C. Skiadas. 1996. Recursive valuation of defaultable securities and the timing of resolution of uncertainty. Ann. Appl. Eckner, A. 2009. Computational techniques for basic affine models of portfolio credit risk Elliott, R., M. Jeanblanc, M. Yor. 2000. On models of default risk. Math. Errais, E., K. Giesecke, L. Goldberg. 2010. Affine point processes and portfolio credit risk Giesecke, K. 2006. Default and information. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 30(11) 2281–2303. Giesecke, K., S. Zhu. 2007. The correlation-neutral measure for portfolio credit Halperin, I., P. Tomecek. 2008. Climbing down from the top: Single name dynamics in top-down credit models Jacod, J. 1975. Multivariate point processes: Predictable projection, radonnikodym derivatives, representation of martingales. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete 31 235–253. Jarrow, R. A., F. Yu. 2001. Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities Kou, S., X. Peng. 2009. Default clustering and valuation of collateralized debt obligations Lando, D. 1998. On Cox processes and credit risky securities. Rev. Leippold, M., L. Wu. 2002. Asset pricing under the quadratic class. Li, D. X. 2000. On default correlation: A copula function approach. Longstaff, F., A. Rajan. 2008. An empirical analysis of collateralized debt obligations Lopatin, A., T. Misirpashaev. 2008. Two-dimensional Markovian model for dynamics of aggregate credit loss Mortensen, A. 2006. Semi-analytical valuation of basket credit derivatives in intensity-based models Papageorgiou, E., R. Sircar. 2007. Multiscale intensity models and name grouping for valuation of multi-name credit derivatives Protter, P. 2004. Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations. Tavella, D., M. Krekel. 2006. Pricing nth-to-default credit derivatives in the PDE framework Zhou, R. 2009. A multi-portfolio model for bespoke CDO pricing. Working paper, Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation.