Determinants of Internal Audit Effectiveness
Abstract
This study extends the literature by building a conceptual understanding of the determinants of the effectiveness of internal audit in organization. This finding specifically investigates five determinants of internal audit effectiveness which are in-house internal audit vs. outsources internal audit, independent and objectivity of internal audit, staff competency, management support and tone at the top and scope of services and planning.
Toward this end it confirms the five determinants of the effectiveness of internal audit are needed in ensuring the well-being of an organization and for it to achieve its objectives.
Key words: In house internal audit vs. outsources internal audit, independent and objectivity of Internal audit, staff competence, management support and tone at the top, scope of services and planning Chapter 1 Introduction
Internal auditing (IA) serves essentially crucial in connecting and linking the business and financial reporting processes of corporations and not-for-profit providers (Reynolds 2000). Control mechanism is needed to be set up to monitor and direct, promote or even restrain the various activities of an organization for the very purpose of achieving its objective. (Sawyer 1988: Coram, Ferguson and Morney 2008). As so, internal auditors play a vital role in ensuring the company’s risk profile is under monitoring and areas to improve risk management is improved.
In an economy that relies highly upon independent process information, internal audit has since become an indispensable control mechanism in both public and private organization. At the end of it, the purpose of internal auditing is to improve organization efficiency and effectiveness through constructive criticism. In order for Internal auditing to be effective in a holistic manner, we will need to look at the five determinants of an effective internal auditing.
Problem statement
The role of internal auditor has been enhanced and widen ever since the
This study extends the literature by building a conceptual understanding of the determinants of the effectiveness of internal audit in organization. This finding specifically investigates five determinants of internal audit effectiveness which are in-house internal audit vs. outsources internal audit, independent and objectivity of internal audit, staff competency, management support and tone at the top and scope of services and planning.
Toward this end it confirms the five determinants of the effectiveness of internal audit are needed in ensuring the well-being of an organization and for it to achieve its objectives.
Key words: In house internal audit vs. outsources internal audit, independent and objectivity of Internal audit, staff competence, management support and tone at the top, scope of services and planning Chapter 1 Introduction
Internal auditing (IA) serves essentially crucial in connecting and linking the business and financial reporting processes of corporations and not-for-profit providers (Reynolds 2000). Control mechanism is needed to be set up to monitor and direct, promote or even restrain the various activities of an organization for the very purpose of achieving its objective. (Sawyer 1988: Coram, Ferguson and Morney 2008). As so, internal auditors play a vital role in ensuring the company’s risk profile is under monitoring and areas to improve risk management is improved.
In an economy that relies highly upon independent process information, internal audit has since become an indispensable control mechanism in both public and private organization. At the end of it, the purpose of internal auditing is to improve organization efficiency and effectiveness through constructive criticism. In order for Internal auditing to be effective in a holistic manner, we will need to look at the five determinants of an effective internal auditing.
Problem statement
The role of internal auditor has been enhanced and widen ever since the
References: 1. Rittenberg, L.E., and B.J. Schwieger, Auditing Concepts for a Changing Environment, 2 Nd Ed. (Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press, 1997). 2. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), 1994, The IIA’s perspective on outsourcing internal auditing: A professional briefing for chief audit executives, Professional Issues Pamphlet 94-1 (Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte Springs, FL). 3. Verschoor, C. C. (1992). Evaluating outsourcing of internal auditing. Management Accounting, 73(8), 27–30. 4. Shapoff, S. H. (1999). Inside out: Why did Warner ask outsiders to do its internal audit? Financial Executive, 15(1), 28–32. 5. Pelfrey, S., and E. Peacock. 1995. A current status report on outsourcing. Internal Auditing (Fall): 26 – 32. 6. Cheney, G 7. Widener, S. K. and Selto, F. H. (1999). Management control systems and boundaries of the firm: Why do firms outsource internal audit activities? Journal of Management Accounting Research, 11, 45–73 8. Subramaniam, N., Ng, C 9. Caplan, D., and M. Kirschenheiter. 1999. Outsourcing and audit risk for internal audit services. Contemporary Accounting Research (Fall):387-428. 10. _____. 1997b. Serving the public interest: A new conceptual framework for auditor independence (White Paper). New York, NY: Commerce Clearing House, Inc. 11. Berton, L. 1996. Who is going to audit the auditors? The Wall Street Journal (March 5): B1. 12. Krishnan, M., and N. Zhou. 1997. Incentives in outsourcing internal auditing. Working paper, The University of Minnesota 13. Levitt, A 14. Verschoor, C. C. 1992. Evaluating outsourcing of internal auditing. Management Accounting (February): 27-30 15. Hodgson, D., and L 16. Aldhizer III, G. R., and J. D. Cashell. 1996. A tale of two companies: The decision to outsource.Internal Auditing (Winter): 10-15. 17. Ahlawat, S. S., and D. J. Lowe, 2004, An examination of internal auditor objectivity: In-house versus outsourcing, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23, 149-160. 18. James, K., 2003, The effects of internal audit structure on perceived financial statement fraud prevention, Accounting Horizons 17, 315-327. 19. P. Coram et al./Accounting and Finance 48 (2008) 543–559 20. Morgan, B., 2005, Drying out fraud, International Auditor 64, 111–115 21. Chadwick, W. E., 2000, Keeping internal auditing in-house, International Auditor 57, 88 22. Martin, C 23. Coram, P., Ferguson, C., Moroney, R. (2008), "Internal audit, alternative audit structures and the level of misappropriation of assets fraud", Accounting and Finance, Vol. 48 No.4, pp.1-17. 26. Dominic S.B. Soh, Nonna Martinov-Bennie, (2011) "The internal audit function: Perceptions of internal audit roles, effectiveness and evaluation", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 26 Iss: 7, pp.605 – 622 27. Petravick, S., 1997 34. Jh Xiangdong, W. (1997), “Development trends and future prospects of internal auditing”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 12 (4/5), pp. 200-2004. 39. Fernandez, S. and Rainey, H.G. 2006, ‘Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector’, Public Administration Review, 66: 168–76 40. Dale, B.G 41. Ebrahimpour, M. and Lee, S.M. 1988, ‘Quality Management Practices of American and Japanese Electronics Firms in the United States’, Production and Inventory Management Journal, 29: 28–31. 42. Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G. and Sakakibara, S. 1994, ‘A Framework for Quality Management Research and an Associated Measurement Instrument’, Journal of Operations Management, 11: 339–66. 43. Sawyer, L.B. 1973, The Practice of Modern Internal Auditing, Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte Springs, FL. 44. Jill, M. 1998, ‘Is the Control Environment Related to Financial Reporting Decisions?’, Management Auditing, 13: 472–8. 45. Schwartz, M.S., Dunfee, T.W. and Kline, M.J. 2005, ‘Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors?’, Journal of Business Ethics, 58: 79–100. 46. Mihret, D. G. and Yismaw, A. W. (2007), "Internal Audit Effectiveness: an Ethiopian public sector case study", Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 470-484. 47. Leung, P., Cooper, B.J. and Robertson, P. 2004, The Role of Internal Audit in Corporate Governance and Management, RMIT Publishing, Melbourne. 48. Al-Twaijry, A. A. M., Brierley, J. A. and Gwilliam, D. R. (2003), "The development of internal audit in Saudi Arabia: An institutional theory perspective", Critical Perspectives on Accounting Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 507-531. 60. Dessalegn Getie Mihret, K. J. (2010). Antecedents and organisational performance implications of internal audit effectiveness: some propositions and research agenda. 62. Sayag, A. C. (2010). The Effectiveness of Internal Auditing: An Empirial Examination of its Determinants in Israel Organisations. 63. Subramaniam, J. S. (2009). Internal audit independence and objectivity: a review of current literature and opportunities for future research. Griffith Business School - Discussion Papers Accounting .