Preview

Describe the Factors Affecting Majority Influence

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
435 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Describe the Factors Affecting Majority Influence
Describe the Factors Affecting Majority Influence

A study was carried out by Solomon Asch which showed the factors which affected majority influence. In his study he wanted to see how group pressure affects group tasks with an obvious answer. The method he used to carry out this study was by using eight male students were arranged around a table but only one of them however was a real participant who turns up late and the others were confederates of the researchers. The task was to identify out of the 3 lines shown on a board which of the lines (A, B or C) was the same length as the test line (X). They answered out loud in turn and the confederates were all told to answer the same incorrect letter. The real participant had a chance to see what the other participants’ answers were, but not right at the end as he may become suspicious. It was important for him to see what the other participants’ answers were because when it was his turn to answer, the researcher gets an idea if the participant’s answer had been influenced by the majority. Asch found that 32% of the genuine participants conformed on the trials and only 26% of people never conformed. From this study, it is shown that group size is an important factor which affects majority influence, the larger the group size the more conformity there is; but only to a point. After about 5 or 6 people, Asch found that more people had very little difference on the amount of conformity. This may be due to the fact that people have guessed the purpose of the experiment. Another factor is majority size and the presence of an ‘ally’. If the majority is unanimous, conformity is much more likely, but if there is even one other person disagreeing with the majority even if it isn't the same as your own opinion then the levels of conformity drops dramatically especially if there is someone who continually disagrees. Asch also investigated that the method of making a decision was another factor, when the participants make

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two major studies in which we can look, at these are Asch and Zimbardo. Asked our student volunteers to take part in the vision test, all but one of the volunteers were colleagues of the experimenter. the volunteers were shown 3 lines the free lines were all different sizes and there was a fourth line which was the same size as one of the 3 lines. All the volunteers had to do was to say Which line was the same size as the separate fourth line. Altogether there were 123 American undergraduates being tested. Asch showed a series of lines to participants seated around a table, participants always answered in the same order. The colleagues were instructed to give the same incorrect answer on 12 of the 18 trials. On 12 critical trials 36.8% of the participants got the answer incorrect in other words they conformed with the majority. A quarter of the participants did not conform on any of the trials. Although people did conform the size of the group depended on how many people conform e.g. if there was a large group and they all said the wrong answers the participant will become suspicious and not conform. Also the participants profession could make a difference on whether they conform e.g. a maths teacher will realise that the size of the line is the same as they work with this sort of thing every day. When the difference between the sizes of the lines decreased, making it harder to distinguish the difference between the lines, the level of conformity increased. this study was only conducted on American men during a period of time when people were scared to be different. another weakness is that only one third of participants conformed the other participants stuck and gave the right answer or the answer they thought was right The next study is Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment. To conduct this experiment a mock correctional facility was constructed in the basement of Stanford University, an advert was…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    House and senate members are called upon to cast a large number of votes each year. In 2007 representatives voted 1,186 times. There are many factors which influence how members of congress vote.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clipping File: Conformity

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is the influence of other group member's opinions on the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of an individual. What if we are not sure how to act in a certain situation. As stated in the text "we know other people conform, we underestimate the extent to which we can be induced to follow the group" (Aronson, p.23,2012). Groups have influence on ambiguous and unambiguous situations. In an individualistic culture, such as that of the US, conformity connotes something negative. However as a society we still need to master the world, and be connect by others. Thus people conform to the opinion of other group members and yield to social norms. As stated by Aronson,…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Asch conformity experiments were a series of laboratory experiments directed by Solomon Asch that demonstrated the magnitude to which an individual's own opinions is influenced by those of a majority group. In Asch's experiments, students were told that they were participating in a “vision test.” The other participants in the experiment were all confederates, or assistants of the experimenter. At first, the confederates answered the questions correctly, but later began delivering obvious incorrect answers. The results revealed that participants did conform to the majority group thirty seven percent of the time, and also for particular reactions.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People can change based on the personalities contained in a group. For example, if the personalities in a group are positive and supportive, then each person’s self-esteem is boosted up and he or she will speak his or her mind. However, if the personalities in a group are aggressive or assertive, then each person might be less willing to speak his or her mind and go along with the group. Not only that, but a typical person wouldn’t stand up for something alone. He/she would instead go with the majority of people. In a group of 100 people, each person with his/her opinion, at least 30 % of those 100 would stand up against everyone else.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    student

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Each of the 123 subjects had been placed in 18 rounds of questioning, 12 of which had been predetermined by the experimenters to be answered unanimously incorrectly by confederates. Of these subjects, 75% of them changed their answers to the majority vote at least once. When under the influence of peer pressure, the subjects accepted the majority and conformed 36.8% of the time. The individual tests differed quite a lot, with some of the subjects conforming once or twice and some who conformed to majority most of the time. 25% of the individuals who partook in the experiment did not conform at all, showing that they weren’t worried about their self-doubt, and were confident to their personal judgment.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In “Opinions and Social Pressure,” social psychologist, Solomon Asch, concludes his findings of numerous experiments conducted to reveal the impact of peer pressure among the individual. His experiments consisted of seven to nine college students; one who was the focal subject of the experiment and the rest who were members of the group instructed to answer accordingly. After many trials and the introduction of different variables, Asch finds that a person who is presented with a partner in his independency, has a higher chance not to conform to the majority. Asch concludes, “With [the partners] support the subject usually resisted pressure from the majority: 18 of 27 subjects were completely independent. But after six trials the partner joined the majority. As soon as he did so, there was an abrupt rise in the subject’s errors” (Asch 181). The subjects do not conform once a partner resists conformity as well, however, as soon as their partner joins the majority, then they begin to join also. Author, Catherine Sanderson, provides reasoning as to why the subject conforms as soon as his partner does. In her book, “Social Psychology,” she presents strategies for resisting obedience. Sanderson claims, “People who are aware of the situational pressures that lead people to obey authorities are more likely to stand up to…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory of planned behavior’s (TPB) goal is to explain human behavior by linking beliefs and behavior (Ajzen, 1991). It is an extension of the theory of reasoned action /c, as the theory of reasoned action failed to predict behavior, in which people did not have complete control over their decision. The central factor of the TPB is the intention. Intention describes the step between being motivated for something and doing something. Intention has been proven to be a good indicator of actual behavior /C Thus, intention captures all motivational factors and passes the effect onto the behavior.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asch’s conformity study made participants tell differences in length of lines when the majority answered incorrectly. These people did not receive any explanation why the majority disagreed and it dealt with an issue that was unimportant. Confusion would have been an issue and it is “hard to act independently when things don’t make sense”. People actively construe and act in response to their subjective interpretation of the experience. It is imperative to imagine oneself in the experiment to understand why someone would not have spoken up.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The bandwagon effect is dependent on majority influence. Majority influence occurs when the conformity is gained by a smaller group of people by following the beliefs of a large number of people in a society. Consequently, bandwagon effect occurs. Conformity can be interpreted as compliance, internalisation and identification. Firstly, compliance occurs when the people simply agree with the majority to gain their acceptance.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology has focused on theory of mind and human nature, and how it pertains to people singing and dancing in public. Theory of mind is important aspect because it explains our behavior towards others and our understanding of one’s perspective. There are many qualities of theory of mind which describes how one feels about singing and dancing in public, such as, Autism Spectrum Disorder and Normative social influence.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One hundred and twenty three male college students were involved in the study. Participants were shown a series of lines, a ‘standard’ line and several other lines in which they would match to the standard line. Their answers were announced one by one in seated order. All participants were told to answer unanimously before the trials began, except for one person out of the group. That one person was the focus of the study, seated at the end of the seating arrangement. His answers gave insights to the effective role social pressure plays on people’s decisions (178). During the trials, 36.8 percent of the participants sided with the unanimous incorrect answers given by the group. Another trial of the study showed, when given at least two people who answered incorrectly, it drastically swayed the opinion of the chosen individual, causing the individual to answer incorrectly by 13.6 percent. Given at least three people who answered incorrectly, the percentage jumped to 31.8 percent, however, anymore than three people would cause the effects of social pressure to remain fairly consistent (180). Solomon Asch also conducted an experiment where no subjects were told of the researchers…

    • 610 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing and contrasting majority influence and minority influence Majority influence is usually thought to produce public conformity, a good example of majority influence in how people behave in the society, In our daily lives, we involuntarilyfollow others so that we can fit in even if we disagree in private, this is also known as normative influence (Manstead & Hewstone, 1996).People comply to others to avoid conflicts, blend and integrate well with the rest, even if it means that they act in ways that are inconsistent with their beliefs. On the other hand, minority influence results in conversion. Minorities need to behave in certain ways in order to convince and influence other people.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jenness 1932

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The aim was to show conformity to a group rather than staying individual and the findings showed this almost perfectly with only three acceptations. The findings support the hypothesis strongly and show that Jenness’s theory was corrects that and individual will conform…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group pressure affects everyone involved in the situation. Whether it’s harming or helping others, your still being affected. In the short story Group Pressure by Rodney Stark an experiment was tested on a group of people to show visual perception done by Solomon Asch. In this experiment, Asch gathers two large decks of cards with different lengths of lines on them. One card will display the correct line while the other cards won’t have the correct length line. As being shown the crowd has to decide which card they think is the closet length to the actual card, the crowd will then shout out their answers. As this experiment was proceeding you pretend you’re one of the subjects. Everyone in front of you is picking the same answer as you, your confidence is boosted. You now feel like you know every answer and there’s no doubt in your mind that you can possibly get one wrong. As the experiment gets harder the other subjects are calling out different answers, answers different then yours. But your 100 percent that your right, this is…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays