Preview

Describe An Example Of Reasonable Ground Of Opinion Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Describe An Example Of Reasonable Ground Of Opinion Analysis
When officers make an arrest without a warrant, they act at their own peril and are allowed no margin of error. Why is this statement written so stringently? The reason the statement is written so stringently is because when an arrest is made the suspect has his rights taken away. This means if the suspect is innocent his rights were taken wrongly. This can open lawsuits for the peace officer.

4. Describe a good example of “reasonable ground of suspicion.” An example of a reasonable grounds for suspicions would be if a black car was reported for a robbery. A police officer notices the same color car in that area reported of the incident. At this point it would be reasonable to believe the car could be involved in the incident even if it wasn’t.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    P1 FINISHED
    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages

    P1 FINISHED

    The police also have the right to use reasonable force if you try to escape or become violent. They also have the right to arrest you, they can handcuff you and they have the right to search you while you’re arrested.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Terry Vs Ohio Case Study
    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Terry Vs Ohio Case Study

    The first sentence of Chief Justice Warren's opinion in Terry v Ohio, is as follows: "This case presents serious questions concerning the role of the Fourth Amendment in the confrontation on the street between the citizen and the policeman investigating suspicious circumstances.” According to Chief Justice Warren this issue had never been approached in the Supreme Court. Warren also stated “This case is dealing on the one hand with is frequently argued that in dealing with the rapidly unfolding and often dangerous situations on city streets the police are in need of an escalating set of flexible responses, graduated in relation to the amount of information they possess. For this purpose it is urged that distinctions should be made between a "stop" and an "arrest" (or a "seizure" of a person), and between a "frisk" and a "search." He believed this could be imposed because it was a minor inconvenience to the person being searched and was acceptable in order for effective law enforcement and secure the safety of the…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of But Only If You Have The Right To Be Silent By Janet Ainsworth
    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of But Only If You Have The Right To Be Silent By Janet Ainsworth

    Janet Ainsworth’s journal article, “’You Have the Right to Remain Silent. . .’ But Only If You Ask for It Just So: The Role of Linguistic Ideology in American Police Interrogation Law,” addresses the complexities that arise when attempting to invoke Miranda rights. Ainsworth begins the article by explaining how the Miranda rights were established as a compromise with its initial goal to alleviate pressure from those detained. She references the Davis v United States case as a key example due to its ruling which held that Miranda rights could only be invoked when the language used by the arrestee has a clear and unambiguous meaning.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lago Vista Case
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lago Vista Case

    Atwater v City of Lago Vista (2001) was a case concerning the fourth amendment. This case was where the defendant Atwater was arrested for a seat belt violation. O’Connor wrote the dissent that the arrest was unreasonable. O’Connor stated “…pointless indignity’ that served no discernible state interest and yet holds that her arrest was constitutionally permissible (Electronic Privacy Information Center, 2005).” She implies that if an officer believes someone committed a crime in their presence they can arrest the accused person. This in O’Connor’s opinion presents an issue with the precedence it sets. To her it seems that police officers can use this to explore options that would be otherwise not permitted without an arrest.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Because It’s Probable: Reviewing Probable Cause, Warrants, Searches, Arrests, and How They Intertwine.
    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Because It’s Probable: Reviewing Probable Cause, Warrants, Searches, Arrests, and How They Intertwine.

    The following paper reviews probable cause as it applies to the duties of law enforcement. We will review different scenarios involving probable cause and the different court rulings that govern police and other law enforcement officer’s procedures involving the searching of a residence, arresting offenders, and the use of warrants. Due, to the inconsistency and complexity involved in real life situations, a multiplicity of use involving warrants, probable cause, searches, and other police actions can occur.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Literature Review # 3: Miranda V. Arizona
    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Literature Review # 3: Miranda V. Arizona

    This is a myth: as long as police have probable cause to believe a suspect has committed a crime, the arrest is valid. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona essentially is that "The prosecution may not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of safeguards effective against self-incrimination". This means that any time a person is in custody and subject to interrogation, the police must apprise the person of his rights, or the statements are inadmissible in…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study
    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case Study

    In today’s society almost all policemen never forget to read the person under arrest their rights because they know about the Miranda vs Arizona case. I believe that they have put more pressure on the police to say the rights because its a matter of the criminal getting let go because they forgot to read them even if the person already knows their rights. If in case that that does happen I still would not let the criminal go if the case was for something bad or something that would harm…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warning Pros And Cons
    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warning Pros And Cons

    Improvements to the Miranda warning could be made through clarifying the statement itself, so that the ideas and concepts addressed would be easier to grasp for the general population. For example, a person’s right to silence…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Exclusionary Rule And Civil Liability Case Study
    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exclusionary Rule And Civil Liability Case Study

    Therefore, the Exclusionary Rule and fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was created as an important protection of the Fourth Amendment. This paper has discussed the Exclusionary Rule, fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, and the difference between the two. It has also discussed the civil liability that officers may be subject to for their mistakes and how they may be forgiven from liability if their mistake was objectively reasonable or if it was made in good faith. Lastly, the author has discussed the importance of obtaining a search warrant when available and how this seemingly simple procedural step will prevent the suppression of evidence, as well as, protect the officer and agency against any civil liability. Although many times officers’ conduct searches under the emergency exception of the warrant requirement, it is generally a lackadaisical excuse which can hardly be defended. In modern times with the inception of recent technology it has become quicker and easier to obtain search warrants, either telephonically or by electronic means. Therefore, it should be instilled in officers through academic and field training to always secure consent or a search warrant prior to conducting a search in order to protect themselves and the integrity of the…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    The Court maintained that the defendant's right against self-incrimination has long been part of Anglo-American law as a means to equalize the vulnerability inherent in being detained. Such a position, unchecked, can often lead to government abuse. For example, the Court cited the continued high incidence of police violence designed to compel confessions from a suspect. This and other…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hypothetical Fact patterns
    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hypothetical Fact patterns

    In this hypothetical fact pattern, Officer Turek is investigating assertions that Tiny recently robbed a bank and is now planning a museum heist. Officer Turek must establish probable cause before applying for a search warrant to search Tiny’s apartment for evidence. The probable cause that Officer Turek has in this hypothetical fact pattern is his “unusual theories about suspects”, which does not constitute probable cause to search.…

    • 850 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona
    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    Creation of the Miranda rights has changed the relationship between citizen state and police suspects. Citizens now have the right to be informed and assurance that they will be protected by institutional power. Suspects can now anybody that they had nothing to with it. The Miranda warnings are rights that are not protected by the Constitution. They are simply a precaution to guarantee protection against self –incrimination. Without the Miranda rights, the treatment of criminals would not be fair.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Safeguards Against Criminal Procedures
    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Safeguards Against Criminal Procedures

    The court will consider whether the officer had reasonable belief that it was urgent to act without a warrant based on the totality of circumstances. During an investigatory stop, the police officer must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime may or will be committed based on the articulable facts. This is a Terry condition during a traffic stop that makes is lawful for an officer to detain an automobile and its occupants…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Miranda Rights
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Miranda Rights

    The rights you are read while being placed under arrest are the Miranda rights. They state that what you say will be used against you in court and that you have the right to an attorney. These rights are read to protect your freedom and to inform you of your constitutional rights. It became procedure to state the rights after the Miranda vs. Arizona case. Ernesto Miranda was sentenced to 20-30 years in prison for counts of kidnapping and rape. In court, Miranda argued that he did not know his rights and that they should have been told to him. He is the reason that criminal suspects receive more justice from police officers.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Illegal Searches of Prisoners and Those on Parole and Probation
    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Illegal Searches of Prisoners and Those on Parole and Probation

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics