Preview

Is Descartes' evil demon thought experiment a stronger argument for global skepticism than his dreaming argument? If yes, explain why; if no, explain why not.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1127 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Descartes' evil demon thought experiment a stronger argument for global skepticism than his dreaming argument? If yes, explain why; if no, explain why not.
IS DESCARTES ' EVIL DEMON THOUGHT EXPERIMENT A STRONGER ARGUMENT FOR GLOBAL SCEPTICISM THAN HIS DREAMING ARGUMENT? IF YES, EXPLAIN WHY; IF NO, EXPLAIN WHY NOT.

Descartes defined global skepticism as all of our experiences, thoughts and everything we know to be true as dubious and deceptive. Therefore we are constantly being deceived and what we perceive to be true may not be true at all. In this essay I will attempt to show how Descartes 's dreaming argument and evil demon argument justifies global scepticism and which of the two is a stronger and more convincing argument.

According to Descartes, we rely on our senses to determine what is most true and many of the decisions we make are based on our senses and feelings. However, our senses can deceive us, so what 's not to say that our senses are not deceiving us all of the time. Or if what our senses tell us is supposedly true most of the time, how are we able to differentiate between when we are being deceived and when we are not? Bearing this in mind it is safe to say that if our senses can deceive us, even once, it is unwise to trust and rely on them. (Descartes, _Introduction to Philosophy,_ 2009)

We then have to ask ourselves that if we cannot trust our senses, what can we rely on and trust to not deceive us. We should then take into consideration the fact that even though our senses can be deceptive, more often than not we can rely on them. Therefore we should still trust our senses but at the same time remain weary of the risk of possible deception.

This brings us to the evil demon argument. What if our senses, thoughts, instincts, perceptions and everything that we believe to supposedly be true has been deliberately placed in our minds by some evil entity that has manipulated us into believing those things? According to Descartes 's argument, it is possible that we are being controlled by an evil demon that has deceived us into believing everything that we have come to know as being true: from sunset to



Bibliography: Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, _Introduction to Philosophy_, 2009 Philosophy lecture notes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Evil Demon Hypothesis is an important component of the Method of Doubt. Descartes used the Method of Doubt to find what is true by withholding assent from all beliefs that are dubitable. However, if Descartes was to scrutinise everything he believed, he would be left with an endless and impossible task. So instead of going through each opinion one by one, he went ‘straight for the basic principles on which all his former beliefs rested’ (Descartes, 2010:15). He grouped his beliefs into the faculties from which they are derived, such as the senses, imagination and reason. He then used increasingly stronger hypotheses to find whether the faculties can be doubted. He began by using the sceptical hypothesis that senses deceive us at a distance. For instance, a person standing under a tree a kilometre away from where you are could mistakenly be interpreted by you as a boy with a golf club when really it is an old woman with a walking stick. But what cannot be doubted are the objects nearby, such as the keypad I’m typing on and that I’m sitting on a chair. So Descartes went to the next argument, the Dream Hypothesis, which claims that our senses are dubitable because when we dream, we are convinced that we are having real life experiences as a wizard or driving to the shops, not asleep in bed. However, with that hypothesis we cannot doubt the laws of physics and mathematics and that we use knowledge from our senses when we are awake to create those dreams. To doubt physics, maths and the most simple things…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the article “External World Skepticism” by John Greco, he mentions a skeptical argument. John Greco doesn’t accept the concept of contextualism, but rather he accepts the sensitivity theory instead. In this paper, I shall argue that the term of contextualsim regarding Descartes example is in fact true. Descartes has a clear example that it does support the conclusion in the skeptical argument. In this paper I will summarize the ideas that Descartes has on solving this quarrel and also the evil demon example. In which supports the argument and the idea of contextualism, rather than sensitivity.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our reasoning can be false and lead us to false conclusions about what we should do. However, can our experiences not lead us to false conclusions as well? The unfortunate thing is that we can be wrong in a variety of ways. It's interestingly difficult to identify a single belief that you have come your way by means of some sense experience via sight, hearing, touch, smell, or taste. It's natural, then, to come to believe that the senses are the sole source and ultimate grounding of…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    as humans are limited not only to what we can sense, but how we perceive what we…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that there is a chance that he is imagining life. When a person envisions, he or she basically designs thoughts that exist to be judged by the brain. The method in which thoughts are created should not always be valid, and due to this they cannot be right all the time. One can have the possibility of some substance that does not exist, for example, an alarm, and this does not represent any issue. Descartes looks at the observations people have in our sleep to those people have when they are alert, these two scenarios are closely identical. He reasons that there is no complete approach to recognize being conscious from being asleep. Nonetheless, he keeps up that there are sure things that would be ignorant to question. He considers a few of his earlier opinions as having a chance of containing doubtfulness. Descartes believes since he thinks therefore he must exist meaning his own being in reality is…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the evil demon argument, Descartes is not denying the existence of God. The way the argument is presented, Descartes makes it seem as if the evil demon coexists with God. Therefore, when his mind is being deceived or being given false information it is not from God but from the evil demon. From this skeptical argument, one would come to doubt the…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After this doubt Descartes reasons that rather than a Deity, it is an evil demon that deceives him. Here he starts to doubt things such as the sky, air, Earth, colors, figures, and sounds. He attributes these to being mere illusions of dreams. By the end of Meditation one, Descartes has doubted his senses, his prospect of reality, God, and an evil demon. All of these things lead him back to where he started at the beginning of his writing. He even states himself that he has “fallen back into the train of my former beliefs.” With this, Descartes has chosen to retreat back under his personal blanket of ignorant…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes' 'Method of Doubt' incorporated two well-known conjectures, a dream conjecture and the evil demon conjecture. What the dream conjecture is, is the notion that everything that is reality might just be a dream. Adding to the dream conjecture, is the evil demon conjecture. This evil demon conjecture, in essence, is the concept that if this all [reality], is just a dream, then perhaps there is an evil demon that is deceiving our minds with these false images of reality. So, we can't assume that our bodies or that anything of our experience exists…

    • 1246 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditations

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The reason why Descartes cannot be certain of beliefs he’s obtained through his senses is because senses might easily be deceived by someone else. This is where the demon comes in, whereby Descartes brings up the possibility of being fed information from an outside source that he does not know of.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Dream Argument

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes was a part of the dream argument. The Dream Argument was “proof” that the sense should not be fully trusted when distinguishing reality from illusions. Descartes…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Descartes Meditation I, he casts doubt as to whether or not we are dreaming. He first uses modus tollens to cast doubt to our senses. He then he uses redictio ad absurdum to show that even if we are dreaming, there are some things that are still real.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our senses should be trusted in certain circumstances. Our senses can only provide us with raw information, but in order to gain knowledge and understanding of the information we need to implicate other ways of knowing. There is a limitation to trusting your senses because our perception will only go as far as our sense organs will allow us, but other ways of knowing such as but not limited to, reason will allow us to progress even further.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perception Essay

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We can always trust our senses to give us the truth, but during the time we use our senses we start making assumptions on whether if what we think is true. This makes the truth flawed in a way because the moment you start making assumptions is the time you will be wrong. This comes to my previous examples, as I said that your senses are not the one to be blamed for giving us false information, it is our brain for converting the information and making assumptions automatically, that gives us flawed information in the end.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics