Preview

Descartes Dualism Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Dualism Analysis
Elisabeth was the princess of Bohemia. Her father and mother have governed Bohemia. She was interested in learning herself. She learned natural science, and she had an interest in philosophy and metaphysics. This attractive appears from her exchanging letters with Descartes. At that time, Descartes wrote his “dualism” idea. Descartes claims that the soul and the body are separated and can’t be together. Descartes considers the body is material, and the soul is immaterial. This idea was not understandable to Elisabeth. Therefore, she wrote a letter to Descartes asking him for clarification about his idea of the soul and the body and how he considered it separated; therefore, Descartes answered her question, but the answer was also not understandable …show more content…
She already knows that the body and the movement cannot happen without impulsion from another physical body. Therefore, Descartes’ answer is there are three concepts that she needs to understand it, the concept of the body, the concept of the mind and the connection between the mind and the body. He defines the association between the body and the mind by saying, “the force of the soul for moving the body, and of the body for acting upon the soul by causing its feeling and passion.”2 He means that the body’s effect on the soul by controls the emotions, and the soul controls the body movement. He tells Elisabeth that she needs to understand the concepts that the body is material, and the mind is immaterial. He tries to give Elisabeth example by using the physical concepts of the weight.3 He said that the weight is not separate from the body. However, Elisabeth did not satisfy with his answer and asked Descartes for more clarification of immaterial soul and its action with the body. He answers that he need to clarify more on the concepts he mentioned it in his first letter (the body, the soul, and the connection between them).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    truth, accepting the sum of present consciousness which ultimately allows an evolutionary transition, transcending the Cartesian Dilemma, aka, Descartes' Mind/Body dualism. Although we are each a single individual, our minds and our bodies seem to exist in two separate worlds which operate on separate rules. The dilemma is unifying the two, made possible by transcending the duality entirely. This allows the emergence of de-limited spirit which then provides the world with a third path, the Path of Neo, the path of peace.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes was a brilliant thinker, philosopher, scientist, physiologist, and early psychologist whose theory of mind-body connection has become an integral part of modern medicine (Goodwin, 2008). His dualist view, asserted the mind was ethereal and autonomous in relation to the physical and strictly material body, and to account for their interaction, he proposed the pineal gland was where the intersection of the two transpired (Goodwin, 2008). He theorized the mechanistic, reflexive nature of certain human behaviors, although his one caveat was that reasoning and thoughts were unique properties of the human soul (Wickens, 2005). Descartes 's work laid some of the fundamental parameters for modern thought in psychology, encouraged further research on the localization of brain function, and promoted further experimental research of the nervous system (Goodwin, 2008).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 101 Questions

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages

    5. What is the point of Descartes' doubt about having a body? Why can't a thing that thinks, an "I think" (cogito), be a body? What is a body?…

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes concludes that we are distinct from our body, and can exist without it. Seen from a modern materialist’s perspective, Descartes’ view is quite obviously wrong. However, assuming no knowledge of modern science, we should still be able to disprove his conclusion by looking for flaws in his reasoning in the text. In this essay, I will examine three relevant arguments Descartes presents in his sixth meditation and point out their flaws respectively.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Believed in soul (mind)-body separation, but wondered how the immaterial mind and body communicated. __________ Descartes…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among Descartes’ many notable arguments, in the Sixth Meditation he makes a case for the real distinction between mind and body. This idea that mind and body are distinct was not common during Descartes’ time and conflicted directly with the popularly accepted scholastic view of the human being as a hylomorphic substance. The argument of the Sixth Meditation draws on much of Descartes’ own work concerning substance, attributes and distinction. In this paper, I will argue that he arrives at the conclusion that mind and body are in fact distinct by a categorical syllogism, focusing primarily on defending the minor premise that mind and body can be conceived as separate.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Meditator is alone, no trees, no people, no oceans, no mountains, no earth, no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”, Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God, people would have created themselves. If this were to be true, everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects to allow humans to think. This human ability to think allows them to exist. If nothing else were to exist and the Meditator was alone in the universe then he could not think and without thought,…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grosz looks at ancient philosophical writers such as Plato, Aristotle and Descartes that evidently emphasize ‘ideals based on sexual binaries and hierarchies’ (47). ). Descartes accomplished‘ Dualism’ which regards both the body and the mind as ‘two mutually exclusive and mutually exhaustive, each, inhabiting their own self-contained sphere’ (48) contradicting feminist work. Grosz uses Cartesianism to explain the more modern day contemporary form of thought that first investigates the body in regards to an ‘object used for natural sciences’ (49). The second line of investigation, views the body ‘ in terms of metaphors that construe it as an instrument, tool or machine at the disposal of consciousness’ (50). The last line investigates the ‘body as a signifying medium, a vehicle of expression, a mode of rendering public and communicable what is essentially private’ (51). Grosz recognizes that the notions of the ‘body’ are embodied from not…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Divisibility

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes believes that the mind and body is different things and that the body is dividable but the mind is not dividable. I’m not sure what I believe, but I think I believe at least for now that the mind and body is two different things. I will explore why Descartes thinks you can divide a body and why he thinks a mind is not dividable. As well as what Descartes response should be to Armstrong’s criticism. Was Descartes right or not? I think this is all up to the interpretation of Descartes Divisibility. There is a number of ways this may be interpreted.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes S Myth

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page

    In “Descartes’s Myth,” Gilbert Ryle main conclusion is that the body and mind are two separate beings.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Substance dualism is often called ‘Cartesian dualism" ‎and is the assumption that mind and body are really distinct substances. Rene Descartes (1596 – 1650) was the first early modern philosopher to hold that a thinking-thing is entirely different form an extended thing and mind can exist without the body. Cartesian dualism, which started the famous mind-body problem of causal interaction, has been criticised by many, one of whom was a primary adherent, Baruch Spinoza (632-1677). This essay aims to explain and assess Spinoza’s criticism of Descartes substance dualism and see what Spinoza offers instead. I will begin by summarizing the views of Descartes on substance and distinctiveness of mind and body and how they interact. Then I will discuss Spinoza’s objections to Descartes views in general but give more details about the ones I believe are more important. I will finish by concluding what Spinoza actually wants out of it and what he really achieves.…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liebniz adds some clarification to Descartes argument in an attempt to strengthen it, he argue that’s Descartes has not asserted how coherent the idea of a “perfect being” is, Leibniz argues that unless this point is demonstrated then overall argument fails. In order to prevent this Leibniz attempts to analyze what perfection actually means, he concludes that this is an impossible task and concludes that it’s impossible to demonstrate all perfections are incompatible with one another, and so it must be said that all perfections can coexist in a single entity, thus keeping Descartes argument valid.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes believed that all human and animal behavior as well as human and animal internal processes was mechanical. In addition, he believed the only difference was humans have a mind that provides them with consciousness, free choice, and reasonableness. Ultimately, Descartes is saying animals do not have a mind or soul which does not allow them to experience things, become conscious, or feel sensations such as things like hunger, pain, or thirst like us humans. I have to disagree with this point that Descartes made here. I believe animals have emotions similar to humans and can feel things just like us humans can instead of it just being a “mechanical” response. It is like saying if you kick a dog, the dog will not feel anything and not…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fifth meditation starts off by Descartes straying away from meditating on the aspects of himself and God and compelling himself to focus on what he was pondering on a few days ago: material things. But before Descartes tries to reason if material things outside himself exist, he must first make sure material things can be definite outside his thoughts without being subjected to doubtfulness. Other than that, anything outside these parameters has to be omitted and seen as distractions from what he is trying to ponder on. He has to understand the difference between the material things that are definite and the material things that are ambiguous or bring about doubt and being deceived through the senses. Descartes first has to audit his…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays