Preview

Descarte's Argument In The Sun, Tomorrow, By David Hume

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
989 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descarte's Argument In The Sun, Tomorrow, By David Hume
A principal cause of Hume’s beliefs differ from that of philosophers like Descarte due to Hume’s rejection of the metaphysic. Hume believed that statements like ‘The sun will rise tomorrow’ were the epitome of human egotism, of which no true answers could ever be found. The only ‘valid’ argument to support such a statement would be the inductive reasoning that the sun has risen before, hence it is very likely that the sun will rise tomorrow. But that argument in and of itself is simply epistemological and strays from the actual assertion. According to Hume, there are relational ideas and then there are facts, only one of these forms of which could be based on true reason.
To Hume, the relational observation about the unseen event of the sun
…show more content…
The notion that the past is indicative of the future forces presupposition upon the idea and therefore finds it rationally invalid. The only point in time in which we could realistically say that the sun will likely rise tomorrow would have to be the present moment that the sun has actually risen, at which time the need to justify our belief would be rendered obsolete. Having experienced the sun rising yet again though would feed back into the vicious circle in which we cannot draw conclusions based on past experiences. We would yet again have no rational basis to predict an inductive relationship between the sun having risen and it rising again any …show more content…
It is the process of arriving at a conclusion based on previous observations, and this repetitive sequence of events allows us to make a habit of assuming that one event will inherently lead to another, even if we do not have a solid, logical foundation for believing so. Hume describes this principle of custom or habit as a ‘natural instinct’ that we would neither be able to compel or prevent our minds from utilizing. This principle is what makes the experiences and memories from our past useful to us in a present sense. By implementing custom or habit we are assuming, using past observations, that future events will unfold in a similar fashion. Without this method of using previous experiences to create inductive beliefs of what is to come, we would be completely ignorant of every event that is beyond the information immediately

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hume criticised the teleological argument in plenty of ways as he believed that the argument was deeply flawed.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, there have been many individuals deserving of praise and admiration. These individuals were all admirable in their own regard. One of the most significant of these individuals was Rene Descartes. Rene Descartes was an admirable individual due to his contributions to philosophy, his remarkable findings in mathematics, and his explanations of the physical world that are still relevant today. Descartes came up with the philosophical arguments of Cartesian doubt, the Mind-Body problem, and Cartesian certainty. In regards to Mathematics, Descartes discovered numerous principles and theorems that paved the way for future discoveries in mathematics. His most notable findings included Cartesian Coordinates, Cartesian Geometry, and "Discourse on Method". In addition to this, Descartes had numerous explanations of the physical world. His most prominent explanations are the first modern formulation of laws of nature, theory of planetary motion, and the study of reflection and refraction of light.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    miracle hume essay 1

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hume uses both an a priori and inductive argument to challenge miracles, which comes from his definition of a miracle as “a transgression of a law of nature which a particular volition of the Deity interposition of some invisible agent.” Hume’s challenge relies on if the laws of nature are fixed, if they are, and the definition of a miracle is that it breaks the laws of nature, then this is a contradiction. If miracles are a contradiction then it is rational to believe that they do not occur. A Biblical example of a miracle is Jesus walking on water - it goes against what we know about gravity and about the properties of water which are both scientific and natural laws, and so it is hard to believe that his could of happened, but due to witnesses it is thought to be true. Hume argues against witnesses as he says it seems more logical to say that the witness is incorrect than to argue that the miracle actually happened.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume arguments from testimony suggest that the only evidence we have of miracles occurring is from testimonies from other people. He says that the likelihood of a miracle occurring compared to that of the witnesses being mistaken. As Hume is a sceptic he argues that the most rational belief in anything must have evidence to back it up.…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take as an example the story of Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead. Firstly, according to the bible, people witnessed the event. Secondly, our experience of nature is that people who are dead do not come back to life. It is true that many people have had near death experience, but once a person has been in a grace or tomb for a day or two they do not come back to life – they start to rot. So this leads to a conflict between a law of nature and the miracle story. Hume’s question would be; which is more likely – that the law of nature has been violated or that the eyewitness accounts are for some reason mistaken? Hume’s conclusion is that miracles do not happen because there is so much clearly testable evidence in favour of the laws of science. Hume’s conclusion is that no testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony of such a kind that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavours to establish.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes discovered his first indubitable truth is that he, himself, did exist. He used his methods of doubt to discount anything he thought he knew previously. He doubted everything his senses had told him because, according to Descartes, what he may have seen or heard might not necessarily be real. He also was not convinced that what he did in his waking life could have been while he was dreaming and, therefore, might also be false. By discarding everything based on the senses, mental imagery and by questioning the existence of God, he was able to start with a blank slate on which to prove his idea. His method of inquiry was knowledge based on certainty. Once he was satisfied that it was certain beyond any doubt, he came to his first indubitable truth, that he existed.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Liberty and Necessity

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Section 8 of Hume’s Enquiry titled “Of Liberty and Necessity”, Hume wants to discuss what liberty and necessity mean and whether or not they can be compatible with each other. This is all really a discussion of Hume’s view of free will and determinism, and how they can be easily reconciled through compatibilism where for example both liberty and necessity are required for morality. He starts off by considering the idea of necessity and defines it as, “the constant conjunction of similar objects, and the consequent inference from one to another” (Hume 150). He wants to talk about its relation to what he calls liberty. He defines his hypothetical liberty as, “A power of acting or not acting, according to the determinations of the will” (Hume 159). This sounds like free will, meaning that people have the ability to act or not act in certain ways. He wants to deny any possibility of chance, because he’s an empiricist, and if you have the possibility of chance, what can you ever really know about the world. In every case, Hume is going to want to go out into the world and see where things come from even these ideas of liberty and necessity to see if there is a way to have both. To take it further, he goes on to claim that we’re all compatibilists without even realizing it. In order to explain his reasoning, he makes three arguments: the necessity argument, the spontaneity argument, and the anti-libertarianism argument.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    to make sense of our world, and that the ability to think mathematically was an…

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes casts everything into doubt in the first meditation, including God Himself. He then comes to this disproval of this theory therefore concluding that God exists. This is brought about through the causal argument.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our inductive knowledge is a series of constant conjunctions and not the necessary connections required to know the truth of nature. For example we see the cause and effect of an apple falling from a tree, the apple reaching maturity and falling from its branch to the ground yet we cannot observe or experience the hidden powers of nature such as gravity. This proceeds to follow to Hume claiming that PUN cannot be justified through deduction. There is no genuine way to have the knowledge of the truths of nature through experience. Hume is right that the principle uniformity of nature cannot be proven deductively either; we are…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Paper

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Cogito ergo sum. “I think, therefore I exist.” This is a very simple expression, yet it is one that has caused many renowned philosophers to rethink their entire outlook on life. Rene Descartes stated this famous phrase and changed the course of Philosophy in doing so.…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume Evidence

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to David Hume, “A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence.” In order to believe in something there must be a solid amount of evidence to substantiate the knowledge or the belief. Evidence is in this case, is defined as something that is presented in support of an assertion. Though it is important to note that the support that an evidence provides could be either strong or weak. As for something to be considered a ‘strong’ form of evidence, it must be provided with anything that links it towards direct proof. Different areas of knowledge require different forms of evidence that would lead to prove the belief. By using two areas of knowledge as an example in this essay, I will discuss the extent of evidence needed…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays