Deontology and Accounting Ethics
Deontology and Accounting Ethics
Amanda Dunn
Liberty University
Introduction
Body
1 Ethical Systems Description
1 Deontological
2 Utilitarian
2 Ethical Systems Evaluation
1 Organizational Culture of Accounting
2 AICPA Professional Code of Conduct
3 Utilization of a Deontological System
Conclusion
Introduction No man can be certain beyond a shadow of a doubt how he will react in any given situation. One can know how he would hope to react; however, until the circumstances are in place behavior can not be entirely predicted. A person’s reaction in the direst of moments is in fact the heart of who they are. While reactions are spontaneous, actions are not and the decisions to act or not to act in one fashion or another are based on an ethical viewpoint. This truth spans across both personal and professional lives and from those individual lives crosses the boundaries into entire professions. Ethics is not limited to individuals, but stretches across entire organizations, social practices, and even complete social, political, and economic systems (Duska & Duska, 2003). The accounting profession is not an exception. This paper will describe the deontological ethical system as well as the utilitarian ethical system, both of which are proposed for the accounting profession. Second, it will evaluate each system with respect to the accounting professions organizational culture and the Accounting Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct. Finally, it will conclude the use of the deontological ethical system as most appropriate for the accounting profession.
System Descriptions There are two ethical systems typically proposed for the accounting profession, namely deontological and utilitarian. Both systems contain characteristics which have been argued to be most appropriate for the accounting world. Each has been purported by authors, philosophers, ethicists, and theologians for
Amanda Dunn
Liberty University
Introduction
Body
1 Ethical Systems Description
1 Deontological
2 Utilitarian
2 Ethical Systems Evaluation
1 Organizational Culture of Accounting
2 AICPA Professional Code of Conduct
3 Utilization of a Deontological System
Conclusion
Introduction No man can be certain beyond a shadow of a doubt how he will react in any given situation. One can know how he would hope to react; however, until the circumstances are in place behavior can not be entirely predicted. A person’s reaction in the direst of moments is in fact the heart of who they are. While reactions are spontaneous, actions are not and the decisions to act or not to act in one fashion or another are based on an ethical viewpoint. This truth spans across both personal and professional lives and from those individual lives crosses the boundaries into entire professions. Ethics is not limited to individuals, but stretches across entire organizations, social practices, and even complete social, political, and economic systems (Duska & Duska, 2003). The accounting profession is not an exception. This paper will describe the deontological ethical system as well as the utilitarian ethical system, both of which are proposed for the accounting profession. Second, it will evaluate each system with respect to the accounting professions organizational culture and the Accounting Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct. Finally, it will conclude the use of the deontological ethical system as most appropriate for the accounting profession.
System Descriptions There are two ethical systems typically proposed for the accounting profession, namely deontological and utilitarian. Both systems contain characteristics which have been argued to be most appropriate for the accounting world. Each has been purported by authors, philosophers, ethicists, and theologians for
References: Altman, Matthew C. (2007). The Decomposition of the Corporate Body: What Kant Cannot Contribute to Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 253-266. Brummer, James J. (1986). Accountability and the Restraint of Freedom: A Deontological Case for the Stricter Standard of Corporate Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 155-164. Duska, Ronald F., & Duska, Brenda Shay. (2003). Accounting Ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Geisler, Norman L. (2010). Christian Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Publishing. Herz, Robert H., Batavick, George J., Crooch, G.M., Schipper, Katherine, Seidmann, Leslie F., Trott, Edward, W., Young, & Donald M. (2006). Ethics Standards. Journal of Accountancy, 4, 99-103. L’Etang, Jacquie. (1992). A Kantian Approach to Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 737-744. Love, Vincent J. (2010). When Rules May Weaken Principles. The CPA Journal, 80, 63-68. Melancon, Barry C. (2002). A New Accounting Culture. Journal of Accountancy. Retrieved from http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/oct2002/melancon.htm Schroeder, R Van Staveren, Irene. (2007). Beyond Utilitarianism and Deontology: Ethics in Economics. Review of Political Economy, 19, 21-35. Wustemann, Jens, & Wustemann, Sonja. (2010). Why Consistency of Accounting Standards Matters: A Contribution to the Rules-Versus-Principles Debate in Financial Reporting. ABACUS, 46, 1-27.