Preview

Deontological Moral Judgments

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
720 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deontological Moral Judgments
First, in this paper I will discuss normative ethics and how people go about making hard decisions. I will explain to you what consequentialism and deontology are. I will also explain how our emotions play a role in our decisions to make consequentialist moral judgements and deontological moral judgements. Next, I will discuss how our emotions influence our decisions. Greene believe that we should not trust our deontological moral judgements. I agree with Greene and I will give examples and reasoning behind why I also do not think we should make deontological moral judgements. Consequentialism says we should only focus on the consequences of our actions. According to consequentialism we should do what is morally right, but the consequences of our actions will determine whether it is righteous or unjustifiable (Gensler, 2011). On the other hand, deontology says that some actions are just wrong (e.g. murder) and it does not matter whether the consequences will be good or bad (Gensler, 2011). In a lecture video by Shaun Nichols, he uses the footbridge case as an example. In this example, there is a runaway train coming and will …show more content…
As mentioned above, emotion and deontology go together. This is because our decision is constructed from our morals and what we think is morally right or wrong, rather than what the outcome of our action is. Greene discusses post hoc rationalization and why we make up reasons for something that is wrong when we have a feeling about something being wrong. In the example of the runway train, we think that it is wrong to push the man off the bridge. Greene argues that we should not trust that disposition because we are reasoning with our emotions. He does not think that we should use our intuitions because we are in a new complex world and our emotions are primitive and not correspondent. Therefore, we should not trust our deontological
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Deontology vs. Consequentialism
    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Deontology vs. Consequentialism

    Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths. While this is sometimes true, it is important to understand how these theories differ. Each of these braches of Ethics deals with morals, actions, ethical decisions and judgments. Beyond the surface though, each of these Ethical ideas begin to differ greatly. Deontology is the theory and/or idea that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to the overall rules. Consequentialism is the theory and/or idea that the morality should be judged on the action’s overall outcome or consequences. Both theories judge morality. However, Deontology judges morality based on the actions themselves, while Consequentialism judges morality based on the end reaction. Out of these two ethical theories I believe Consequentialism to be least likely to be false.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral Dilema Determination
    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral Dilema Determination

    24, March 2013 Moral Dilema Determination inspired many of the suffering persevere in their rescue efforts which eventually paid off…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    HU4640 Project Part1
    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages

    HU4640 Project Part1

    This paper is going to discuss Ethics and Ethical Theories. It will include an introduction to ethical theories, virtue ethics, and care ethics. There will be sections discussing absolutism versus relativism, consequentialism versus deontological ethics, and lastly, free will versus determinism. It will also include a discussion about the study of morality and identify which of the approaches (Scientific, Philosophical, or Theological/Religious) are closest to my own personal beliefs. There will be a discussion regarding the three sources of ethics and what they are based on (Reason, Emotion, and Intuitionism).…

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper

    There are different systems in which an individual or a company could make ethical decisions. They can vary depending on the issue at hand and they relate and different in certain ways. In this writing I will compare the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. I will include a description of the differences in how each theory addresses ethics and morality. And I will give a personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper
    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper

    In this essay it is required to compare and contrast the similarities and the differences between three major ethical viewpoints or theories. The three that will be explained are virtue theory, utilitarianism and deontological ethics. Since its revival in the twentieth century, virtue ethics have been broadly termed for a theory that focuses on the role of character and virtue in moral judgment. Most virtue ethics theories take their inspiration from Aristotle who said that a virtuous person is anyone who has ideal or good character traits. This theory judges a person on their character rather than an action that at some times maybe different from their normal behavior.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper
    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper

    Ethics has been used as a basis of human morals from Greek times to today’s hectic and fast paced society culture; it is based on a number of factors both of a personal and cultural aspect focusing on a people’s conception of right and wrong. Either way philosophers use logic, critical thinking, and reason to find the answers to a wide variety of non-empirical human questions to what is morally right and wrong. Below I have provided information on three ethical concepts of utilitarianism ethics, virtue ethics and deontological ethics.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethics and Ethical Theories Utilitarianism
    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethics and Ethical Theories Utilitarianism

    Comparing and contrasting ethical theories helps one to understand ones guidance system which helps or aides one through their decision making process. “Each theory emphasizes different points such as predicting the outcome and following one's duties to others in order to reach an ethically correct decision.” (2011) Each theory has a familiar thread with an end goal. In this paper each of the following three ethical theories utilitarianism, Virtue, and Deontological will be described relating to ethics and morality. Concluding with a personal experience with which the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to utilitarianism.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Deontological Ethical Analysis
    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Deontological Ethical Analysis

    Human beings have been clearing forest for many years in order to have land for farming and keeping livestock (nasa.gov). The need to feed the ever increasing population has in most cases necessitated clearing of forests to plant crops and produce food. However, this action has resulted in reduced forest cover especially tropical forests. Tropical forests are known to be home of various animal species. Therefore, when tropical forests cover decrease so will the population of animals that depend on the forests for food and shelter. Despite the fact that clearing of tropical forests increases land for farming so as to meet food demand for the growing population, the arguments of deontological ethical theory would disagree. According to deontological ethical theory, human beings are morally obligated to act according to certain set principles and rules regardless of the outcome of the…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess The Difference Between Consequentialism And Deontology
    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess The Difference Between Consequentialism And Deontology

    Meanwhile, in deontology approach, an action is considered to be a right or an ethical action if that action is in accordance with the moral standard of a right action, regardless of its consequences to affected parties/people. The moral standard of the actions are in absolute term, so they cannot be justified even if they are used to pursue worthy goals. Secondly, people/parties in consequentialism/utilitarianism approach are regarded as the means to achieve maximum utility or in other word means that the right of the few may be ignored in order to achieve larger result (utility) for all those affected, while in deontology/Kantianism approach, people/parties are regarded as the ends of the action, so the rights of everyone that is involved are considered. Lastly, situations and interests will influence the ethical judgment in consequentelism approach but they do not influence the ethical judgment in the deontology approach.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Deontological Ethical Theory
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Deontological Ethical Theory

    The development of social policies within the United Kingdom is extremely complex. Often involving conflicting factors. Each government must consider human rights and the individual entitlement of members, while also respecting the political and social moral values of the state. Human rights are basic rights and freedoms that every human is entitled to regardless of who they are, where they were born or how they chose to live their life. In the United Kingdom, these rights and freedoms are protected by the Human Right Act 1998 (Equality and human rights commission, 2010).…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    James Rachel's Deontology: Ethical Theory
    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    James Rachel's Deontology: Ethical Theory

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Difference Between Virtue Theory Utilitarianism, And Deontological Ethics
    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Difference Between Virtue Theory Utilitarianism, And Deontological Ethics

    Virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics are three of the different approaches to ethics. This paper will go over the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and the deontological principles. It will also include information of the variations in how each concept details ethics, morality, and will also discuss a personal experience to describe the correlation between virtue, values, and moral perceptions as they relate to one of the three theories.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Deontological Theory Of Criminal Justice Ethics
    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Deontological Theory Of Criminal Justice Ethics

    Law enforcement officers are criminal justice professionals whose duties involve ensure public safety and enforcement of laws. Within the criminal justice system law enforcement detectives performs investigative duties such as gathering facts and collecting evidence. The initial information provided to detectives is the most critical factor in solving a crime. Therefore, it is inherently important that the detectives follow all department rules and demonstrate sound judgment when making decisions. The criminal justice ethics tutorial examines the ethical dilemmas detectives may face where the right choices can be difficult because of the costs involved.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Deontological Ethical System
    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Deontological Ethical System

    A deontological ethical system is one that is concerned solely with the inherent nature of the act being judged. If an act is inherently good, then even if it results in bad consequences, it is still considered a good act. Teleological systems judge the consequences of an act. An act might look bad, but if it results in good consequences, then it can be defined as good under a teleological system.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Objections to the First Formulation of Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay Example
    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Objections to the First Formulation of Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay Example

    Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality "The good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes or because of it's adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it's willing, i.e., it is good of itself". A maxim is the generalized rule that characterizes the motives for a person's actions. For Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by the maxim of doing the right thing because it is right thing to do. The moral worth of an action is determined by whether or not it was acted upon out of respect for the moral law, or the Categorical Imperative. Imperatives in general imply something we ought to do however there is a distinction between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives are obligatory so long as we desire X. If we desire X we ought to do Y. However, categorical imperatives are not subject to conditions. The Categorical Imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures because they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Moral, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viablity of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics