Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Democracy vs. Martial Law

Good Essays
733 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democracy vs. Martial Law
Philippines: Martial Law Regime or Democratic Country

Before the Filipinos attained the democracy of their country, they first experienced the different kind of discipline the most of their leaders gave, the Martial Law regime. Martial Law (Batas Militar) refers to the period of Philippine history wherein Philippine Presidents and Heads of state declared a proclamation to control troublesome areas under the rule of the Military, and it is usually given when threatened by popular demonstrations, or to crack down on the opposition. Martial law can also be declared in cases of major natural disasters, however most countries use a different legal construct like "state of emergency". Most of the leaders establish the dictatorship instead of democracy, because they thought that it would be the best way to help our country overcome the troubles of their country. The first leader, who established the first Martial law regime was Governor-General Ramon Blanco, next was General Emilio Aguinaldo, then Former President Jose P. Laurel and last was one of the known dictators of the Philippines, Former President Ferdinand Marcos. He justified that it is because of the large threats of communist and Muslim rebels unto the country. Once in effect, it covered the entire republic on September 21, 1972. It was announced to the public two days later. The GNP of the country on that regime, increased at $11.5 billion by 1980. From the declaration of Martial law, the US President gave $2.5 billion for economic aid and bilateral military of the country. Everyone has a curfew on that time. Everyone shouldn’t be caught outside their residences from 12 o’clock midnight to 4 o’clock early morning. Or else, the cops will put you in jail, but will release you the next day. Depends on how heavy your mistake is. Marcos was very strict in that time. He started increasing the rates and prices in the market. Even the smallest mistake can lead you to a punishment. But the crimes lessen because most of the people are frightened and scared about the punishment they will receive if ever they’ll do something wrong.
Cory Aquino established the democracy in the Philippines. She started the coalition of social and economic organizations. She also established the governance in which the people are the ones who “rule”. But what has happened only or have changed after Marcos administration is the increased of freedom of people to do whatever they wanted to do including the relentless and useless killings of everyone against their fellow Filipinos, most especially the media people, though the media people have gain more freedom to express their ideas and thoughts, murderers and killers have gain also more freedom to kill media people. It is a directly proportional freedom.
Moreover, there is also an increase of murder and massacre crimes in the Philippines wherein still today these form of crimes were not yet totally solved though some cases were filed.
Though democracy is the primal priority during the Ms. Aquino Administration, ironically, there are also a number of military coup d’ etats and nationwide brownouts or loss of electricity then, that is because everyone have now more freedom to do whatever they wanted to do and to say whatever they wanted to say. But thanks God, the Philippines is still “check and balance” by the republic form of government that it has still today and not yet totally succumb to totally democratic system of government, lest the Philippines will self-annihilate itself. However, I don’t say that democracy is wrong, but too much of it could break down the system because of no major agreement of every aspect in life in the Philippines; too much of it could bring disharmony because everyone will be right on his or her own ways. And, of course, too much of discipline can lead to revolt of the people against its leader, or worse, to its country. To solve this dilemma and to use effectively the privileges of democracy in the country, the new Philippine president should, yes, create portals like public forums to bridge and voice out the ideas and wants of every citizen in the country that will discuss and articulate the advantage and disadvantage of everyone’s ideas. We should always balance things, neither less nor too much. On that way, we’re able to create a major consensus that will bring peace and harmony in the Philippines.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The great glory about American Democracy is that it was founded on civil disobedience. Democracy isn’t perfect, however, I believe Democracy is only able to flourish through a series of revelations from conflict. Peaceful civil disobedience is worthy for the reasons that; firstly it draws attention to the problem, secondly acts as the catalyst for change, and finally it fulfills the moral obligation that society failed to engage in.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Being the leader of a country, a President’s decision can greatly affect the present situation that the country is facing. Whatever decision he makes can sum up his abilities towards leading his people. It influences the people with the President’s decision in terms of support or disapproval. Support in the sense that if he’s decisions are acceptable for the people or group of people, he gets endorsed and applaud for the validity of his action. Disapproval in the sense that if it is denied by the people, the President is subject for explanation, he is also vulnerable for mockery among his people. The final decision he would then make will be the verdict of what’s waiting for the country, especially in times of war. If reasonable actions were already made but the peace among people is still missing, a President can declare Martial Law as his final resort. To lead the country in times of war is never easy. The President’s capacity to declare martial law in a time of chaos will be a great way for the President to fully think of what he should do while the country is on idle mode. Although he’s declaration will still be grounded on the approval of the other branches of the Philippine government, consent towards its declaration will be based on necessity.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to answer this question we must first examine the generic basis of both democracy and dictatorship separately. The term democracy originates from the Greeks, and is defined as “rule of the people” coming from the words “demos” (people) and “kratos” (power). It was coined around 400 BCE, to denote the political systems then existing in Greek city-states, notably Athens. Commonly, two forms of democracy are recognised, these being direct democracy and representative democracy. Direct democracy was used in Athenian democracy, and is a system in which people vote on policy initiatives directly. Many US states and Switzerland still use this system often. Representative democracy refers to the system which is in place in Britain today. It is a variation of democracy founded on the principle of elected people representing a group of people.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which is the best type of government; dictatorship, monarchy, a republic? There are so many to choose from. Many people say that a democracy is the best type of government system and that is very true. In both articles, “Democracy vs. Authoritarianism”, and “Types of Political Systems” it mainly talks about democracy. In “Democracy vs. Authoritarianism” it just talks about democrats and authoritarianism regimes as explained in the title.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An idea that was memorable in the lord of the flies was the idea of democracy vs dictator ship. This idea was memorable because it juxtaposes two contemporary governments: a democracy where a leader rules with the intention of helping others and a dictatorship where a leader rules with oppression, putting his own needs before the group. We are challenged to comprehend that a dictatorship uses fear, power and arbitrary rules in order to inflict chaos and anarchy onto society where as a democratic leader uses, order, authority and justice in order to maintain civilization lord of the flies was memorable because it addressed an ongoing the on going global tension Between democracy and dictatorship. And that is why this idea was so memorable it teaches us that dictatorships do exist and that in some countries such as syria and libya dictator rules are exercised on a repetitive basis.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thus, the Presidential system follows a track to democracy by giving the people the change to have a right in saying and choosing what they find best for their nation. However, in a parliamentary system the ideas are different. Its track to democracy is attempted when the people are included in the parliament and the power of implementing policies is not just restricted to one person. Also, the systems have in common the fact that they depend on legislature, which helps the systems to execute and implement laws. Providing real life examples of countries and their running of the systems, will help evaluate to what extent these countries fit in the path of democracy and how their ideas are applied in reality.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Authoritarian Versus Democracy, what’s the difference? In an Authoritarian Democracy there is only one ruler or a small group of rulers as The democracy in the U.S. has a president and a congress to go through before the law is made final. An Authoritarian government has only one Leader, known as a king/Queen that inherits the title of King/Queen or takes it over by force. In Our Democracy we as a whole elect our “leader” known as a president, as of now it’s Donald Trump.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is a government of the people, for the people, by the people. In this government, people are the rulers and the ruled. Government is formed through elections. All the adult citizens cast votes and elect their representatives. This democracy is run through their elected representatives. Dictatorship is a form of government in where there’s a centralization of power. All power rests in the hands of one person. The people have no say in what goes on.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are basically two types of government, Democracy and Dictatorship. Democracy is a majority ruled government. The origin democracy government formed in 400 B.C. in Athens. There are three kinds: Direct democracy where people directly vote in decision; indirect democracy where people elect representative to make decisions, such as our Congress; and Elite democracy where the rich make decision. A dictatorship is government ruled by the few over the many. There are different kinds, such as Communism which meet basic needs of all people; Monarchy where ruled by birth right; Oligarchy where ruled by the few military; and Fascism which is the system of government in Italy. These two types of government are totally opposite of each other and they both have their advantages and disadvantages.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the beginnings of the times, from ancient civilizations dated as back as 2000 B.C.E., the world had been based upon political systems and philosophies of governments. A country’s philosophy of government determines the economic system and the amount of rights that people have within that country’s borders. As people can see, in the article written by Severine Deneulin “Democracy and human development”, she explains the complexities of the relationship between democracy and human development, there she made it clear that the practice of democracy is good whether or not the government chose has a positive impact in the society of that country. Another article about countries’ governmental philosophies was written by Gene Sharp, and it is called “From dictatorship to democracy”. Throughout the entire article, Sharp said that it was wrong to compare democracy to communism because communism is an economic system and democracy is a political system, and that’s why he compared democracy and dictatorship. Within the lines of that article, Sharp mentioned that dictators are the result of having a disunited society in those countries, and that people should protest against the dictators to get their rights back as well. Therefore, everyone’s way of living Is affected by their country’s philosophy of government in a direct way.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy vs Dictatorship

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a democratic form of government the ultimate power lies in the hands of the people and they play a very important role in the governing process. It is a government which is based on the consent of the people, while a dictatorial government is a government by one man or a group of persons who acquire power either through force or by force and consent both. In a dictatorship, power is exercised in an arbitrary manner.In a democratic government, people elect their representatives and every person enjoys equal political rights; in a dictatorial form of government the head of the state is not elected.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Governments range throughout the world, whether a country may have a democracy, oligarchy, monarchy or a dictatorship depends on the head of state and the citizens themselves. Two well-known forms of governments, that are both found more often than others, are a democracy and a dictatorship. These forms of governments hold their strengths and weaknesses, and differ when it comes to power distribution. Whether which governmental system is better depends on the eyes of the person.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philippine Environmental Law

    • 16000 Words
    • 64 Pages

    by the populous. The President is limited to one six year term. The legislature is…

    • 16000 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The year 1986 opened the door to a new era of military interventions in Philippine politics. The EDSA People Power Revolt showcased a total makeover in the Armed Forces of the Philippines’ (AFP) image, evolving from an armed forces subservient to a 20-year dictatorship (Selochan, 1989:1) to an armed forces dubbed as the “protector of the Filipino people[i]” (De Leon, 2005: 47-49). However, barely four months after installing President Corazon C. Aquino in office, various elements in the military – Marcos loyalists, Guardians, and the RAM-SFP-YOU staged four successive failed coup attempts and two aborted coup plots from July 1986 to August 1987 (Selochan, 1989:11-15). Then again, in December 1989, just when civilian authority over the military seemed to have already been functioning, another failed coup attempt was launched, which almost toppled down the presidency. After a decade of calm at the close of the century, the AFP barged once more into the political limelight when former AFP Chief of Staff Gen Angelo Reyes, along with the commanders of the Army, Navy and the Air Force, unexpectedly withheld their support from their Commander-in-Chief at the height of EDSA Dos, which eventually forced the former president to leave Malacanang (Trillanes, 2004:14).…

    • 8201 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Conflict in Mindanao

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Throughout their respective articles, "The Continuation of Civil Unrest and Poverty in Mindanao" and "Peace and Conflict in the Southern Philippines: Why the 1996 Peace Agreement is Fragile", Ringuet and Bertrand analyze similar concepts as they examine the deep rooted aggressions of the Mindanao based revolutionary groups. Although there are numerous reasons for this tension, the ones that are most responsible are the many internal conflicts that the Philippines have suffered. The declaration of martial law by President Ferdinand Marcos in 1972 greatly exacerbated these issues. Marcos believed that if his military was not dealing with external threats, it should be used to work on the interior problems of the developing country. Marcos used this philosophy to keep himself in power, after his constitutional term ended. The Armed Forces of the Philippines became a dominant and corrupt force. This conflict has left approximately 120,000 dead since the 1970's, and greatly stunted the economic growth of one of the country's poorest areas. An estimated 700,000 people have been displaced during the…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays