Preview

Democracy and the Federalist: a Reconsideration of the Framers Intent

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
270 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democracy and the Federalist: a Reconsideration of the Framers Intent
The structures and protections of the US Constitution have a great deal to do with “the good life”. I believe (parts of) the Constitution was written to protect our wealth and keep the ongoing struggle to become rich a reality for all and is also an essential part of the government during its early stages as well as today. Happiness and safety, (aka, “the good life”) was a large part in the underlying message of The Constitution. The founding fathers had to have a view of the fundamentals of politics and its relationship to the many. My initial thoughts gravitate toward self-preservation, without it we would not be the nation we are today (and in part the way the founding fathers possible wanted the government to be). Within the need for self-preservation essentially came the Constitution as we know it today. It was a means to have security from dangers of “domestic convulsion” as stated by our founding fathers. We can be certain that previous statements regarding how the government should conduct itself, supports the idea of “the good life”. “Justice is the end of the government. It is the end of civil society.” (Fed. # 51). Per Martin, “justice” means “civil rights” and in his terms meant the protection of economic interests. A recurring item pertaining to the object of government is that it refers to “happiness”. These two basic ideas bring together the real notion that The Constitution was built around the ideals of protecting ourselves and keeping the many as happy as possible.

Reference:
Diamond. M. Democracy and The Federalist: A Reconsideration of the Framers
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist No. 39 Summary
    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Federalist No. 39 Summary

    The Federalist No. 39 “The conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles,” is the thirty-ninth of The Federalist Papers and was published by James Madison on January 18, 1788. Madison defines what a Republican form of government is considered, which was what the nation was currently called. It also considers whether the nation is federal or national: a confederacy, or consolidation of states. At the current moment the nation was considered Federal and states were confederate, but they were leaning towards A National government. (federal vs. national government.) Madison then defines what republic means and states three rules which must comply to be considered a Republic:…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis: Why Is Our National Government A Federal Democratic Republic?
    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis: Why Is Our National Government A Federal Democratic Republic?

    Why is our national government a Federal Democratic Republic? Well my most simple answer for this is. We are a Federal Democratic Republic because the citizens are the ones that have the power, and the government itself is ran through elected officials. Or at least that's what we like to tell ourselves. The politics of this country work in a peculiar way, since usually the person who has the most funded campaign, is the one who wins, and the ones who tend fund a politicians campaign usually happen to be big corporations so they can call in favors later. So to some extent our elections are bought. Whoever has the most money can travel to more places, make more billboards, bumper stickers, commercials, etc. they have more resources to tell…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Is the U.S. President Too Powerful? Federalist and Anti-Federalist Perspectives
    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is the U.S. President Too Powerful? Federalist and Anti-Federalist Perspectives

    Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives at first tend to appear to be polar opposites in nature. The Federalists supported and sought to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America. Whereas the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to do so, and feared that the powers allotted in the Constitution would result in the newly birthed United States descending into a monarchy. The very same form of government that had proved dissatisfactory to the colonists in the first place. Therefore it may appear to be a moot point when deciding whether both viewpoints would be in harmony or opposition in regards to the power held by the modern presidency. The Anti-Federalists believed that power should rest with the states. However the Federalists wanted a strong central government headed by one official. This was because the Articles of Confederation (which gave the majority of power to the states) had failed miserably. However, while the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held opposite viewpoints, they had the same goal in mind: To create a free and balanced society, “It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one,” (Brutus, 25). However, due to the initial ambiguous measure the framers of the Constitution took with regards to the executive branch, there have historically been events of a United States President overstepping his boundaries and violating the merits of both U.S. and Constitutional doctrine. Therefore both the Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists would agree that in light of decisions made during George W. Bush’s consecutive terms that the modern presidency must be restricted.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Federalist 10
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Federalist 10

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Lawrence Vs Texas
    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Lawrence Vs Texas

    Americans view the Constitution as the Holy Grail to guide our country and provide meaning of the law. It also gives a designation of powers to each branch and the states. Our essential freedoms are specified to us by the Constitution and have been stripped away from some individuals based on their sexual preference. In the Lawrence v. Texas case, it proves that the Supreme Court is continually re-interpreting the Constitution.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Framers Of The Constitution In The 20th Century
    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Framers Of The Constitution In The 20th Century

    Until the 20th century it has been understood that the framers of the constitution were “for the people”. Revisionists of the 20th century are painting an entirely different picture. They “argued that the Constitutional Convention was dominated by an elite and that the Constitution itself is an instrument written to protect elite interests.” (Fisk 2014)…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist Side: Both Side Of The Anti-Federalists
    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Federalist Side: Both Side Of The Anti-Federalists

    Both sides had strong opinions and beliefs on the subject, but the side that I thought was more convincing was the Federalists side. I think the Federalists were right when they said America was in need of a stronger national government. If our government were to become weak, like the Anti-Federalists wanted, then our world would become a chaotic mess, the rules wouldn’t apply to everyone. I think that you need to have rules and laws to keep people in check, if we didn’t have them then everyone and everything would become crazy.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Separation of Powers

    “The Declaration of Independence puts forth many core American values. However, these values have to be institutionalized, or made concrete in an established system, which is where the U.S. Constitution comes into play. Even though it does not mention “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness,” the Constitution creates institutions that reflect those values. The principal institutions in the Constitution, which have also become values unto themselves, are the separate branches of government. The Constitution creates three of these: the legislative, (which, as we explained earlier, is further divided into two chambers, providing an…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratification Of Federalism
    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ratification Of Federalism

    The Federalists, writing under the pseudonym Publius, advocated a strong central government against the anti-Federalist writers like Brutus, whose fresh memories of British tyranny inspired their fear of centralized power. While there is much debate on who theoretically won the political battle, that resulted in the ratification of the constitution in 1789, it is clear that modern America has been pushed in a direction, far past James Madison ideas of a balanced federal government.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratification Of Federalism Essay
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ratification Of Federalism Essay

    In addition, the ratification of federalist papers. Once the document was presented to the states for ratification, Madison, along with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, published a series of newspaper essays that became known collectively as the Federalist Papers. Writing under the pseudonym "Publius", Madison authored twenty- nine of the eighty- five essays. He argued the case for a strong central government subject to an extensive system of checks and balances where in "ambition" would be counteracted by competing ambition. The collection of documents are classic statements on republican government and stand as a significant early interpretation of the meaning and intent of U.S. According to James Madison's quote, he said If men were angels,…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalism: United States Constitution
    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalism: United States Constitution

    The United States constitution created a new type of government called federalism, which divided power between the states and the national government. But the proper balance of federalism has been debated throughout the history of the United States, Federalism, which signifies members of a group that are bond together with a governing representative head. Two time periods that there has been a debate on federalism was the Supreme Court under John Marshall in (1801- 1835) and the extension of slavery in (1820-1860).…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Democracy: The Role Of Democracy In The United States
    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Democracy: The Role Of Democracy In The United States

    Democracy is a famous form of government that is practiced in many parts of the globe. This form of government vests the highest power on the citizens of the country. It is for this reason that democracy is referred to as the government of the people, by the people and for the people. Citizens exercise and practice their democratic rights via various means: electing leaders of their choice and the representative or rather the candidate that acquires the highest votes gets elected for that particular position. Democracy however is not just about elections, it entails other perspectives such freedoms of the media and the human rights extent to the citizens of the country under consideration. The word democracy has not been mentioned anywhere…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Importance Of Democracy In The United States
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Importance Of Democracy In The United States

    The United States is said to be and has the properties of a democracy. A democracy is defined as a government in which the people decide matters directly through town hall meetings or voting on a ballot box. There have been a few major laws passed that have been passed by Supreme Court in which the people didn’t have a vote or consent on the law. Two examples of this are legalizing gay marriage and gun laws. The United States has also in a way turned into an oligarchy. It has come to where the rich are starting to rule the country. If the U.S was truly a democracy the government would look to all of the people for their vote and consent on a law, and their should be equality between the first, middle, and lower class people.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalism and Gay Marriage
    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalism and Gay Marriage

    The Constitution was written to uphold the rights of the citizens of the United States of America along with stating which parts of our government has the right the govern the citizens. With that being said, the Constitution is also purposely very vaguely written as the Founders knew that our nation was just forming and would be constantly changing. With the vague text along with the changing of the Nation over the past 300 plus years, many things that were deemed as right during the forming of our Nation have been changed and amended as well as now being deemed as illegal, such as slavery.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics