Declaration Of Independence Pros And Cons
As the push for independence from the British in the late 1770s became more evident prior and post the revolutionary war, the true seed of the American identity was planted with the adoption of the Declaration of Independence by the Second Continental Congress at the Pennsylvania State House on July 4, 1776. The colonies soon began taking their first steps as a nation as they took on the enlightened views of John Locke and Sir Isaac Newton, evidently leading to the establishment of the 10 amendments that would act as the fundamental principles of the blooming nation, and establish a foreground for the coming ones which define the United States today. Unended for and in a fragile state, the now independent colonies were strong patriotically
…show more content…
In order to repeal the 2nd amendment, a new amendment must take its place, which those supporting the repeal of the 2nd have no replacement for, two-thirds of the legislative bodies of the U.S. Congress must accept it, and lastly, thirty-eight out of fifty states must vote in agreement. Therefore it's almost impossible, and very very difficult for thirty-eight consecutive states to vote yes for the removal of their protection; it would be as one giving a burglar a key to their house, but in this case giving up a right many have died for in the 1700s. Though the government may be removing the guns from the hands of its citizens, the violence still remains. In fact, the removal of the constitutional principle was proved to be futile when a similar repeal in handguns occurred in the United Kingdom in England and Wales in the year of 1996, when a “50 percent increase in homicide rates” occurred, the firearm homicide rate doubling between 1996 and 2002, causing more problems in a country with fewer tensions than that of the U.S. and forcing one to ponder on whether the repeal would truly save people, or put them in more
In order to repeal the 2nd amendment, a new amendment must take its place, which those supporting the repeal of the 2nd have no replacement for, two-thirds of the legislative bodies of the U.S. Congress must accept it, and lastly, thirty-eight out of fifty states must vote in agreement. Therefore it's almost impossible, and very very difficult for thirty-eight consecutive states to vote yes for the removal of their protection; it would be as one giving a burglar a key to their house, but in this case giving up a right many have died for in the 1700s. Though the government may be removing the guns from the hands of its citizens, the violence still remains. In fact, the removal of the constitutional principle was proved to be futile when a similar repeal in handguns occurred in the United Kingdom in England and Wales in the year of 1996, when a “50 percent increase in homicide rates” occurred, the firearm homicide rate doubling between 1996 and 2002, causing more problems in a country with fewer tensions than that of the U.S. and forcing one to ponder on whether the repeal would truly save people, or put them in more