Deborah Tannen The Argument Culture Analysis
In her article “The Argument Culture,” Deborah Tannen suggest that in today’s society people most confront others, in order to solve a problem. “The best way to discuss an idea is to set up a debate; the best way to cover the news is to find a spokespeople who express the most extreme, polarized views and present them as “both side.” Tannen gives as an example. Tannen explains the actions argument culture uses in order to find a solution.
The right to express an opinion can be great, but it can create a dilemma. Finding ways to solve the dispute, is important for the society to function. Tannen explains the influence media, such as newspapers and magazine, can create a negative impact in society. Large groups of people can sometimes be influence by an article in a magazine, which does not demonstrate the real facts. “Setting up a fight between two sides leads us to assume that every issue has two sides, no more or less.” Tannen said. Problem can have multiple sides. Believing there can only be one solution to a problem, can sometimes lead the wrong decision. People perceive the world in various ways, which can create different opinions in a group. As a result, things in the original event can be change, and finding the solution might become impossible. The lack of communication …show more content…
Learning more about a person, can help both sides find a solution. Changes in communication the argument society can be cause by technology. The lack of face to face communication has increases, as technology has progress. Phones have helped people to communicate with others, but it has increase the lack of face to face contact. The internet has also change communication in groups, and families. No longer having to travel to see friends or family, because e-mail has become a normal way to communicate. Families and friend relationship might be changing, so it natural for a culture to
The right to express an opinion can be great, but it can create a dilemma. Finding ways to solve the dispute, is important for the society to function. Tannen explains the influence media, such as newspapers and magazine, can create a negative impact in society. Large groups of people can sometimes be influence by an article in a magazine, which does not demonstrate the real facts. “Setting up a fight between two sides leads us to assume that every issue has two sides, no more or less.” Tannen said. Problem can have multiple sides. Believing there can only be one solution to a problem, can sometimes lead the wrong decision. People perceive the world in various ways, which can create different opinions in a group. As a result, things in the original event can be change, and finding the solution might become impossible. The lack of communication …show more content…
Learning more about a person, can help both sides find a solution. Changes in communication the argument society can be cause by technology. The lack of face to face communication has increases, as technology has progress. Phones have helped people to communicate with others, but it has increase the lack of face to face contact. The internet has also change communication in groups, and families. No longer having to travel to see friends or family, because e-mail has become a normal way to communicate. Families and friend relationship might be changing, so it natural for a culture to