Preview

Debating in Schools

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Debating in Schools
Debating can be a daunting prospect for people who have never participated in a debate before. It should not be!

In this section, the key terms of debating are introduced. As with anything, jargon can be off-putting but debating terms are simple and easy to understand. The key terms are listed below. There are also other terms that you may come across from time to time in debating but are not essential when introducing debate to a class.

Term Definition
House The room in which a debate takes place is referred to as the House, and whilst a speaker is speaking they ‘have the floor’. The House is also the term used to describe the people in the room at the time of the debate, ie the other debaters, audience members, judges and timekeepers.
Motion The motion is the topic or subject that is being debated. Motions traditionally begin with the phrase ‘This House would…’ or ‘This House believes’. Motions should be of interest to the audience and for the speakers. They can be directly related to something being discussed in class or, if at an after-school club, can be about a current affairs issue, a school issue or any other interesting and challenging topic. An example of a motion is ‘This house would ban school uniform’. (See Useful motions).
Proposition The proposition is the name for the team or teams proposing a motion. This means that they are in favour of the motion. So in the example given above, the proposition team or teams would be arguing in favour of banning school uniform. Their role in the debate would be to persuade the audience and judges that the motion is correct. They should provide information, arguments and evidence to support their case.
Opposition The opposition is the name for the team or teams opposing the motion. Their task is to provide arguments against the motion to counter the proposition’s case. In the example above, the opposition team would be in favour of keeping school uniform.
Points of Information A Point of Information

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Caucus- a meeting of members of a legislative body who are members of a particular political party…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the campaign speech for Charles Foster; the speaker presents strong, sound, effective arguments and counterarguments, with the use of rhetoric devices and fallacy, to help get his point across more effectively. The speaker stated his arguments clearly and backed them up with strong, sound evidence. In the speakers counterarguments’, the speaker addressed, what he believed the audience might say or question, in a productive manner.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HISTORY REVIEW

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8. Is a committee appointed by the members of the upper and lower house to resolve disagreements on a bill passed in different versions in each House.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Tannen is a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University. Her study of language and how it is utilized has led her to have many books on the “Best-Selling” List. In her book, “The Argument Culture”, Deborah Tannen takes a closer look at how we as a society have come to view arguing/debating as a normal form of communication. Our inability to look at more than two views at a time, has led us to limit the potential conversations that could easily take place. In this essay, Professor Tannen takes a shot at making us believe that being in an “Argument-culture” is not the best thing for us as a whole. She wants us to see that it is truly a problem but that it can be fixed by following her advice. Tannen feels that everything…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Argument Culture” is a persuasive essay written by Professor Deborah Tannen. As a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University, Tannen experience in language leads her to write many books in this field. Tannen uses “The Argument Culture” essay to persuade her audience that this society’s way of looking at debate encourages an “adversarial frame of mind” (Tannen, 305). Three of Tannen’s main points include; polarized views in the news, the use of “war metaphors’ by media to catch the readers eye, and even in the language mankind uses in everyday life. Tannen’s essay also includes different ways to look at these each of these situations that may help reduce the debate language that this society uses every day.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When debating MPs are able to express their views to influence policy in the debates on current events and actions. Every proposed piece of legislation must be debated at least twice, this is good as the policies may need amendments applied to them, or they may just be policies that would not be in the interest of most of the country. The MPs are able to subject bills to scrutiny, especially if they have a major impact on their constituency; this is to their advantage, as the policies may not go into action and completely discarded. The ministers are forced to present all policies to the House of Commons before any public announcements are to be made.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lincoln Douglas Outline

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before you begin your speech briefly thank the judge and your opponent for providing the opportunity for this important debate.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another thing that parliament is the debate that takes place in parliament. The members of parliament can point out the advantaged of a particular change in the law, as well as flaws in any proposed change in the law.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At one point in time many people were debating whether to ratify the Constitution, people took sides and some were supporters while others were opponents. The supporters and opponents both had major arguments and debates about whether the Constitution should or should not be ratified.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It consists of a group of statements with one or more statements (premises) supporting another statement (conclusion). In Critical Thinking, argument is an act of presenting reasons to support individual’s position or point of view. It is not quarrel or dispute. By "argument," we mean a demonstration or a proof of some statement, not emotional language. E.g., "That bird is a crow; therefore, it's black."…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rba Personal Essay Sample

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My involvement in adjudicating for debating at UWS under the guidance of USYD’s debating club best reflects my desire to assist others, in this case, younger students (years 7 & 8) who were practising with debating. I undertook this work because it was rewarding to assist others become more confident in communicating their ideas but was also both a challenging and valuable…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DURING presidential elections in the United States, it has become customary for the main candidates to engage in a debate. The topics discussed in the debate are often the most controversial issues of the…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mathew Fraser Speech

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A reference to the arguments or various positions that can be taken on the issue…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tannen

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tannen’s “Fighting for Our Lives” touches on how our culture is seen as an argument culture where there are two distinct sides to an argument seen as being either right or wrong, without a middle ground. The argument culture, Tannen explains, urges us to approach the world in an adversarial frame of mind: the best way to approach any sort of idea, dialogue, or conversation is to set it up as a debate. This tactic does not solve any residing problems, by ignoring what the other person has to say and assuming your opinion is better than them is not going to resolve any issues.“In the argument culture, criticism, attack, or opposition are the predominant if not the only ways of responding to ideas.” According to Tannen we battle for top dog, strive to be the best, and to prove that we are right whether that means to criticize or manipulate words around in order for a feel of self-satisfaction.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    a hearing for a full range of positions on a topic or issue; clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions;…

    • 1555 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays