Preview

Death Penalty Sppech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty Sppech
Sean Elledge speech

Imagine your Father, Brother or Uncle Working a late night shift as a police officer and going into a bar to respond to a call about a noise complaint. At the end of the night, you find out that they had been stripped down into their underwear and shot numerous times. That’s what happened in the death of two Lodi police officers by two men, Thomas Trantino and Frank Falco. Should these two men get the death penalty? I will discuss some of the grounds for justifying the death penalty. First of all, one of the most convincing reasons why the death penalty should be used is because it lowers crime rates. According to Steven Goldberg the chairman of the sociology department at City College in New York, the best evidence that the death penalty has a unique deterrent in crime is not based on statistics, but is rather based on common sense and experience. Furthermore, Professor Isaac Ehrilich said that each additional execution prevents about seven or eight people from committing murder. Just like in everyday life, if you see someone get a ticket for throwing an illegal u- turn, are you most likely going to do it? No, because you know what the punishment is going to be.

Another good reason why the death penalty should be used in our society is to protect our loved ones against horrible deaths by murder. As Edward I. Koch explains, human life deserves special protection, and one of the best ways to ensure that protection is to assure that convicted murderers do not kill again, and only the death penalty can accomplish this end. One thing that the death penalty can do is give closure to the families of the victims. Using the death penalty, justice is applied without the people taking the vengeance into their own hands. However, not only does the death penalty

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First, the death penalty gives closure to the families of slain victims (Should). They feel like justice has been served. Secondly, it contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system (Should). It is true all U.S. and state federal prisons are overpopulated, some as much as 33% (U.S.). Another reason people are pro-capital punishment, is because DNA testing is now available and can now effectively eliminate almost all uncertainty as to a person 's guilt or innocence (Should). Many people who opposed the death penalty are now for it, all because of the availability of DNA testing. They think if DNA proves a person is guilty, then they are guilty. However, what if there is not any DNA evidence, but other evidence linking a person to a crime such as, an…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historically there is no clear evidence that the death penalty has decreased the murder rate or acted as an effective deterrent to murder. Capital punishment is a violation of natural rights. This is wrong for everyone who is involved: The prosecuted innocent, the criminals, the victim’s family and our nation. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for the innocent. Nothing good comes out of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    pre ap reasearch paper

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In our country’s justice system the death penalty is good for many things, such as, serving as a deterrent for violent crimes all over the nation. We as humans have the ability to decide for ourselves whether an idea is good or bad. Often times to do this we look at the actions of others to earthier strengthen our confidence in our idea or to deter the idea that we have. This is the same concept that the death penalty brings to our society. the death penalty according to Richard Worsnop a writer for the CQ Researcher, “…is traditionally justifiyed in society for two reasons, retribution and detturance(Williams). The Latter of the two in retrospect is the most important. In our justice system the main crimes that are punishable by the death penalty are felony murder or murder in the first degree(Mitchell). Felony murder is defined as, “a killing treated as a murder because, though…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument for the death penalty is that many accept as true that if you kill then you deserve to die. When an individual takes another individual’s life they forgo or surrender their own right to their life. Committing a homicide is one of the vilest felonies anyone can do and therefore it should get the nastiest penalty they can receive.…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has many benefits. One is that it can help stop evil people from hurting others again in the future. A study in Texas, a state where re-arrests are common, showed that only 20% of prisoners served all their time (Dieter). If the death penalty had played a bigger role in Texas prisons, fewer prisoners would have been released early, and re-arrests would become less common. It has been shown that for every inmate put to death 3 to 18 murders are prevented (Muhlhausen).…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Let me begin with money issues that comes along with death penalty also known as capital punishment. Death penalty is quite costly. From 1090’s government spent shocking 2.3 billion dollars on pre-trials, trials, appeal, and jury selection of capital punishment cases. Article by Katherine Baicker titled…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass serial killers such as Charles Manson, Gary Ridgeway, and Dennis Radar are still serving their life sentences for their crimes they committed many years ago. These three men are a known as a few of the most notorious killers to walk this earth. They’re responsible for hundreds of deaths of innocent people. However, criminals that commit horrendous acts of crime continue to live alone in a maximum security prison cell away from other inmates to ensure their safety. Without the use of the death penalty, these criminals never feel the pain they deserve to feel. Serial killers roam the streets of the U.S, killing victims each day all the while knowing their punishment for this crime won’t result in the loss of their own life. Unfortunately, life in prison allows horrible people to live their life out in good living conditions, perhaps even better than how they were living as a member of society. While some citizens are against the death penalty, I believe it gives families closure for the loss of their loved ones. If someone takes the life of an innocent person, it is only right they receive the same punishment their victims endured.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The death penalty is an age-old punishment where a person is put to death for certain serious crimes such as murder. This punishment is intended to make potential murderers think twice before killing someone out of fear of losing their own life. Personally, I agree with the death penalty because, for a civilized society, preventing murder should be a priority. The death penalty is the most severe punishment available, as it takes a person’s life away, and in addition to serving as punishment, it also serves as a means of preventing the criminal from committing further crime. This punishment, in name alone, is an indicator of just how detrimental the individual’s crime really was.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not only does the death penalty take care of murderers, but it also “…gives closure to the victim’s families who have suffered so much. (Messerli)” After the murderer has been executed, the victim’s family will feel a since of relief even though it did not bring their loved one back; they will feel better that the murderer will not be able to inflict pain and suffering on anyone else.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Esaay

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1993 a man by the name of Reggie Clemons was sentenced to death in the US state of St. Louis due to being an aid to the death of two young white women. There was no physical evidence that he helped cause these deaths and due to ‘prosecutorial misconduct’ the jury was sacked. Even so, Clemons is still on death row despite no evidence against him. This shows that even people who have done nothing wrong can be falsely accused and convicted. This is inhumane.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays