Death Penalty Pros And Cons Essay
Recently there has been a major controversy about whether to keep the death penalty or to dispose of it. A portion of the world’s population supports the death penalty, while others frown upon it. The death penalty helps the government prevent deaths, costs taxpayers less, and provides assistance to those who do not wish to live through their rough feelings. Though keeping the penalty does have its consequences, the lengthy list of pros overpowers the cons. First of all, not a single human being should be forced to live if they are shattered by guilt. Prisoners are in jail for one reason: they have committed a crime worth being punished for. When a heinous crime comes along, guilt is almost always sure to follow. It is only natural
…show more content…
In fact, almost as well as the free citizens of the United States. Brett Smith states in his article “Prisons are too Soft” that prisoners own books, magazines, food, and television sets. The taxpayers of this country spend their hard-earned cash helping to pay for this luxury. Smith argues that prison life could even be a step up for those who live in bankruptcy! Could people even save money by breaking into prison? The article “Prison Pay” mentions that criminals earn $.60 a day. That adds up to $200 a year. The daily wage of $.60 a day is too high for those who have committed a heinous crime, especially if free citizens have to help pay the fee. The United States could possibly save millions of dollars if criminals are put to death. Opposers of the death penalty may argue that the tax money citizens pay goes to an important cause that will aid the people who pay the taxes by shielding them from some dangers. Though this may be true, citizens could possibly pay even less and still be protected by the government from a few crimes. The money that pays for running jails could go toward education, medical needs, and other demanding requirements. Citizens should not have to help pay for these criminals to live a luxurious life that they do not
In fact, almost as well as the free citizens of the United States. Brett Smith states in his article “Prisons are too Soft” that prisoners own books, magazines, food, and television sets. The taxpayers of this country spend their hard-earned cash helping to pay for this luxury. Smith argues that prison life could even be a step up for those who live in bankruptcy! Could people even save money by breaking into prison? The article “Prison Pay” mentions that criminals earn $.60 a day. That adds up to $200 a year. The daily wage of $.60 a day is too high for those who have committed a heinous crime, especially if free citizens have to help pay the fee. The United States could possibly save millions of dollars if criminals are put to death. Opposers of the death penalty may argue that the tax money citizens pay goes to an important cause that will aid the people who pay the taxes by shielding them from some dangers. Though this may be true, citizens could possibly pay even less and still be protected by the government from a few crimes. The money that pays for running jails could go toward education, medical needs, and other demanding requirements. Citizens should not have to help pay for these criminals to live a luxurious life that they do not