Preview

Death Penalty and Electric Chair

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
995 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty and Electric Chair
When Moran writes that he aims "to demonstrate how our most cherished social values can be manipulated to serve pecuniary interests: the way in which public policy is affected by behind-the-scenes maneuvering of powerful and often ruthless business interests," I think he is talking solely about the death penalty (xviii). There are various aspects within the death penalty that make it a much more dynamic issue. Throughout his book, Moran writes about the inhumanity of the death penalty, including the barbaric methods and public spectacle of the act prior to William Kemmler, and most importantly, the safety and efficacy of direct current versus alternating current in the eventually preferred method of the electric chair. Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse, along with a few others, were the players who manipulated how the public, and therefore the lawmakers, felt about this social policy. As it is today, the death penalty was a big debate issue in the early part of the nineteenth century. I think it is interesting that, considering his major public role in this issue, Thomas Edison was initially against capital punishment. When Dr. Southwick solicited Mr. Edison 's advice on the electric chair, Edison wrote "as a progressive and a free thinker, he was a lifelong opponent of the death penalty" (74). With further prodding, and deeper review, Edison realized how getting involved with this issue would help his personal business cause. Thomas Edison 's light business was quickly losing ground to rival George Westinghouse. He knew he was widely respected as an electrical engineer and claimed not to change his stance on executions, but acknowledged the necessity and offered a humane alternative with electricity. More specifically and strategically, he offered up George Westinghouse 's alternating current dynamos as a possibility because he claimed, "the passage of the current from these machines…produces instantaneous death" (75). These statements made


Bibliography: Richard, Moran Executioner 's Current: Thomas Edison, George Westinghouse, and the Invention of the Electric Chair. (New York: Vintage Press, 2002), pp 74, 75, 84, 105, 160, 179.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A campaign to smear Tesla’s invention was launched by Edison and his financers J.P. Morgan. Edison used AC power to perform public electrocutions of dogs and cats. Ultimately, Tesla’s invention of AC led to the creation of the electrocution chair for prisoners. The ability to end the life of an individual through the use of electricity was stated eloquently by Dr. Albert…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hanging, Lethal Injection, Electrocution, Gas Chamber, and Firing Squad are the five methods of execution that were used in the United States. The most commonly used method today in the United States is lethal injection. Only 36 states in the US are authorized to carry out executions (Ecenbarger, 2010).…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edison initially tried to capitalize on the public fears of high voltage AC by running a PR campaign involving the use to AC to execute animals (and people in 1890). He preferred small-scale DC. Edison expected to sell his parts to companies, allowing them to build their own generating plants. However, large power plants began to emerge with the creation of a national grid that provided shared power to large populations. This favored AC motors and generators.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the historical era in the state of Texas, the use of the death penalty was common and frequent; before 1923 districts carried out executions themselves, in the form of hanging. However in 1923 the state of Texas prepared every execution to be carried out by the state in Huntsville using the electric chair as the method of execution. The state of Texas put to death their first prisoner by electrocution on February 8, 1924 and there were four more executions following the very first one on that date. The inmates that were sentenced to death and the areas that the executions were taken place were located in the Huntsville division from 1928 to 1965, and the last electrocution was carried out on July 30, 1964. This state electrocuted a sum of 361 inmates from 1924 to 1964. During the changes and views on capital punishment in the year of 1964, there were legal disputes regarding the death penalty that resulted in the de facto moratorium on executions in the United States. During these challenging times on June 29, 1972 in the case of Furman v. Georgia the United States Supreme Court ruled that each states capital punishment law in the U.S. was illicit since the death penalty was unjustly used and arbitrarily assigned. During that time there were 52 men in Texas awaiting execution, however the governor overturned all their sentences to life in prison and there wasn’t anyone left on death row by March of 1973. Even though death row was cleared and the inmates received life sentences, the state of Texas approved a new statue in1973 to regulate how capital punishment was assessed. In 1974 with the new statue, jurors began enforcing death sentences and the number of death row inmates began to increase once again. In 1977 Texas implemented lethal injection as a form of execution and the first lethal injection was administered on December 7, 1982.…

    • 2408 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The use of technology in conjunction with scientific forensics has changed much of the way in which cases are handled, reducing, if not nearly eliminating, wrongful convictions (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015). Certainly, I can see why you feel so strongly about taking the stance you have with regards to the death penalty. Consequently, I place my faith in the criminal justice system to carry out each investigation to avoid false convictions, moreover, I do support the death penalty in capital cases. Although the cost associated with the prosecution of the offender are significantly higher than that of a regular murder trial that would not sentence the offender to death, the cost of housing the offender for life would be much higher. Incarcerated…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These obstacles make it almost impossible for the death penalty to ever be carried out. Typically, death row inmates end up dying due to other factors such as health complications rather than being put to death (Petersen & Lynch, 2012, p. 1270). Essentially sentencing someone to death, and placing them on death row is basically the same as a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. The difference, however is that the sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole carries a significantly smaller price tag for tax payers. Furthermore, with violence rampant in prisons across the nation life in prison without the possibility of parole is not exactly living a comfortable life.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is set for those who decide to do illegal crimes, like bringing or selling illegal drugs. But the death penalty is a cruel and unusual punishment which many innocent people die for. Many people are against the death penalty because there’s mostly about racial discrimination, it punishes the poor, and can put innocent lives at risk.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty In America

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty in the United States of America is a topic that many people could have both negative and positive reactions toward. Everyday there is a murder being made, whether it's a small type of crime or a large type of crime. Someone gets killed and justice is either served or not, depending if the murderer is caught. Some say we live in a freedom type where we are free to do whatever we want. However, that is not the case. There are laws in the United States that citizens of must follow and comprehend in order to not receive punishment. That type of punishment can vary based on the type of crime which had took place.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Killing is wrong. It’s something that has been driven into us since childhood its indisputable truth. So why is capital punishment allowed? For those of you that don’t know what capital punishment is, it’s the death penalty the murder of a people in our society who are mentally or emotionally unstable, have anger management issues or simply made a plain mistake. These are many of the reasons that account for the homicides that take place each year, these are people that should have the chance to change yet have those chances taken away from them. Capital Punishment is just not humane and should not be legal.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In America

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The corrections system in the United States is known for having the highest incarceration rate than any other country and some people believe our punishments are either too harsh or too lenient. In my opinion I believe it depends on the type of crime correlating with the punishment. Not necessarily all of our punishments for crimes are too lenient or too harsh, I would say it relies on the type of crime committed and even specifically the technicalities of the crime. There will always be room for improvement for our sentencing and punishments for crimes, but our penal code and our laws are written quite well, it’s all about how you depict the law and what a judge decides on as far as the punishment…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Esaay

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty is wrongly used and it is still used in many countries even though it can be used on the wrong people and innocent civilians that have been falsely accused of crimes. Personally, I think that the death penalty is a horrible and disgusting thing and that it should not be used except for extreme cases.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is illegal in some countries and allowed in other countries in fact 72 death sentences were given out in the U.S. In the court death penalty is a sentence given to the suspect if the crime is decided to be fatal to society. In summary death penalty should be allowed because people will be treated not to do it, exterminates criminals and it will teach another citizen not to commit crimes.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are thousand punishments to remind criminals for those terrible things they did The laws are made for protect people and country, but more is to let people know the illegal and legal movement. We should punish criminals to let them realize their mistakes and learn a lesson. Laws and punishments are protecting us in the mean time they are teaching us. Death penalty executes criminals ,how can they learn their lesson if they die , what can they do to pay for their mistakes. In my opinion we should abolish the death penalty , everyone deserves a second chance to better their lives. I believe if a person live on the world whatever how bad he is we should give him a light of hope to lead him to a better life, the death penalty is going to end all these possibility he will get in the future , and the only thing he has is despair. People is changeable, those hateful criminals could be good if we give them a chance. It is humanitarianism to abolish the death penalty ,we should respect every life in the world.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays