Capital punishment or the death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The discriminative decree that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence, while the actual process of killing the person is an execution. This may be done as an act of retribution, to ensure that the individual cannot commit future crimes, and or as a deterrent for potential criminals.Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. This one is the bill that the government wants to re implement as a law to the Philippines. According to the research, the death penalty bill was pending since the year of 2005. Many say that this is so interesting because the death penalty is one of the most hotly debated topics in the world. Many religions oppose it, although others support it or take no official position. Some modern philosophical theories of ethics disagree with the practice, although many philosophers argue that certain crimes should automatically result in the person losing his or her "right to life." The researcher comes up to this topic because of the many interesting issues that this bill includes. It talks about human rights, if death penalty right or wrong, justice, mercy, forgiveness and many others that are related.
The significance of this study is that it can inform us or make us aware that there is a bill that is pending in the Philippine senate now. It also makes you see the perception of the people regarding on this issue, if they feel or think that it will bring goodness to our country or maybe it will help the country to solve a particular problem faced. This study also aims to inform people the cause on why do the government wants to re implement this bill as a law to our country. What are their intensions or desires on why do they want us to have a law like this. Lastly it gives us information about the advantages and disadvantages of having the said bill as a law. Does it give us benefits that someday we will be happy with or a failure that we may be dispraise? This study aims to have knowledge on why do the government wants to implement this law to our country. Secondly, to be able to find what this law would bring to us if this will be approved to beimplemented. And lastly to be able to know what do people perceive about the implementation of this law to our country. In this study, it gathers information about the purpose of this bill, if it can help to minimize crimes in the society, minimize the population and also if it gives justice. This is also a research that tells the effects of implementing Death penalty bill as a law to the Philippines.It discusses the term Humanitarian and if it is acceptable to the humanity. Lastly it also gives the perception of the people regarding on what they see on the said bill.
This study has the purpose to discover answers to questions through the application of scientific procedures. Excluding the said objectives earlier, this research also intends to find out the truth which is hidden and which has not been discovered yet. It will conduct a survey among the intended people which will be Students, Professionals and the people who live normally like house wife, food vendor and etc.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Capital punishment as defined by Thiroux, J. and Krasemann, K. (2012) is the inflection of death for certain crimes. Capital punishment is a widely debated topic. Some states have banned its use and others continue the practice. Philosophies differ on its use some call for an eye-for-eye type of punishment and others call for rehabilitation. The ethical debate of weather capital punishment is just and should be carried out are intense and some hold strong beliefs one way or the other.…
- 475 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Specific deterrence- punishment of a crime that prevents the offender from repeating the same offense again.…
- 470 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In his paper, “The Minimal Invasion Argument Against the Death Penalty”, Hugo Adam Bedau argues against the death penalty. Bedau’s purpose is to convince people to favor the lifetime imprisonment over the death penalty with an argument that had been previously used by other authors called “The minimal Invasion Argument”, which he considers to be “the best argument against the death penalty”(Bedau, 4). In this paper I will describe Bedau’s argument and show how he has some weaknesses addressing the concept of the minimal invasion argument by ignoring what in my opinion is the main reason why the death penalty has not been abolished; this reason being our incapacity as humans to “define” our environment. When we call one thing by a name we believe this thing is the name by which we have called it. For example when we call somebody a criminal we take away many of the characteristics that make us equal to the criminal and then just call him or her a criminal. With this essay I want to prove that in some cases as human beings we need to believe in re-definition, in change; all this in order to build a better society. To do this I will first explain Bedau’s argument as best as possible and then conclude with the issues I found on it that are based on our language as the interpreter of our world.…
- 2559 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Title: Point: Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished. By: Ballaro, Beverly, Cushman, C. Ames, Points of View: Death Penalty, 2009 Database: Points of View Reference Center…
- 4048 Words
- 17 Pages
Better Essays -
After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…
- 837 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The mother of a teenager killed during a shooting rampage at a Chuck E. Cheese restaurant in Aurora in 1993 is begging the governor to let convicted killer Nathan Dunlap die. "Sit back, make no decision, allow the one that 12 people made after listening to all the evidence 17 years ago stand," said Sandi Rogers in a statement sent to Gov. John Hickenlooper. Sandi 's son, Ben Grant, was 17 years old when he was shot and killed with his co-workers. Dunlap had been fired from the restaurant before he came back and shot five people at closing time. Four died, one survived. Ben had only worked at the restaurant for three weeks before the shooting. Sandi said Ben didn 't even know Dunlap. "He 'd never met the guy, he 'd never even seen the guy before," Sandi said back in 1993. Ben 's family and friends said he was a bright, strong, funny young man. "He never got to get married, and have children, he never got to see the world," Sandi said. The sole survivor of a mass shooting in 1993 is tired of talking about the man who changed his life forever. “Every time I have to speak on this, it re-opens wounds,” said Bobby Stephens. Stephens was 20 at the time of the shooting. He was picking up some extra hours at the Chuck E. Cheese restaurant where he worked when gunman Nathan Dunlap came in to rob the store. Dunlap shot and killed Sylvia Crowell, 19; Ben Grant, 17; Colleen O’Connor, 17; and Margaret Kohlberg, 50. Dunlap also shot Bobby Stephens in the face, but didn’t kill him. Stephens lay wounded and bleeding until the robbery was over. Dunlap was convicted and sentenced to death for his crimes. Now, 20 years later, Dunlap learned he will live at least a while longer. Gov. John Hickenlooper announced on May 22, 2013 he’s granting a temporary reprieve of Dunlap’s execution. Capital punishment, also dubbed the “death penalty” is the premeditated and planned taking of a human life by a government in a response to a crime committed by that legally…
- 1453 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
In the poem “To an Athlete Dying Young” by A.E. Housman, a classical scholar and poet, who was once a Professor of Latin at University College, in London in 1892, and the song “My Hero” by the band Foo Fighters, an American rock band formed by singer/guitarist/drummer Dave Grohl in 1995, both talk about a hero who dies young and in the peak of their fame. Similar literary elements that the poem and the song shared were they both had apostrophe and both of their stanzas are quatrain. Something that “To an Athlete Dying Young” had that “My Hero” did not have was metaphors and personification. The poem and song are both try to look at death in more of a positive way, and being young but still being able to have such an affect on others.…
- 1117 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
2. What amendment to the U.S. Constitution gave women the right to vote, and in what year?…
- 663 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Have you ever wondered what life would be like knowing that a murderer went free after killing one of your family members; it is a very unsettling thought knowing that people have this feeling everyday. The death penalty is the best punishment for murderers because it is condoned by the Bible, gives closure to family members and keeps the cost of inmates down.…
- 544 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Forgiving violence does not mean condoning violence. There are only two alternatives to forgiving violence: revenge, or adopting an attitude of never-ending bitterness and anger. For too long we have treated violence with violence, and that's why it never ends.” (Coretta Scott King, Widow of Martin Luther King) Capital Punishment should be considered cruel and unusual punishment. The Catholic Church is adamantly opposed to the death penalty. The death penalty should be banned as long as there are non-lethal means to defend and protect the people’s safety.…
- 1865 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Capital punishment or the death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The judicial decree that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence, while the actual process of killing the person is an execution. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term capital originates from the Latin capitalis, literally "regarding the head" (referring to execution by beheading).…
- 666 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It is more reasonable to utilize the death penalty than to abolish it. The death penalty should not be abolished because (1) it deters…
- 333 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
| 6. Cost of Death vs. Life in Prison 7. Race 8. Income Level 9. Attorney Quality 10. Physicians at Execution…
- 4827 Words
- 20 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the hit show Prison Break, Lincoln Burrows is put on death row for a murder he did not commit. Each week we saw firsthand, his frustration and the desperation of the situation he was in. This television show is a reality for the many innocent people that have been put on death row. Since 1993 there have been 138 defendants exonerated from their death sentence. The number of innocent people put to death is probably higher. Supporters of the death penalty say that the benefits of the death penalty outweigh the risk of executing innocent people. This is not true because the risks are too high, and the benefits too small. This high risk of mistakes occurring can be attributed to police errors, and problems with the judicial system. For these reasons, the death penalty should be abolished.…
- 2380 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The death penalty has been most talked about for years, to some it is an unfair way to pass judgment on a person. The argument went as far as to say that conforming to such a method is a step backwards and offers no real solution. Critic Coretta Scott King argued strongly against the practice and rebukes the idea. One can always say what they want about the matter but insufficient knowledge with hinder their judgment. The death penalty ought to be considered as a means of punishment for those who commit ghastly murders.…
- 666 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays