Preview

Death Penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1306 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty
The death penalty is the most inhuman and crucial punishment. Even though it is not applied in every state, the death penalty is a very strong debate and argument within our own government. There are people who support it and those who are against it. The death penalty is a punishment to those who due to their actions and circumstances commit crimes. All people are all equal under the eyes of the law and those people in the end are still humans no matter the crimes they have committed. The death penalty is looked as a violation to the eighth amendment. It is an invalid form of punishment. The risks of inaccurate judgment can change the live of a human within just a few seconds. Taking away another person’s life for committing a crime is like taken an easy way out. The U.S. government should stop using immediately death penalty as a way of punishment because it is unfair, unethical and crucial.
Our founding fathers wanted a government that would show the tyrants or absolute monarchs of Europe that it was possible to coexist and live free within fair justice. Even though they excluded any religion to be part of the government regulations, they used Christianity to influence them and built a strong foundation for the new type of government. In a webpage of the history of death penalty they stated that they used the bible and popular teachings to create basic laws and form basic human rights that many religions would forbid death penalty such as; Catholics, Presbyterians, Quakers, Amish’s, and Mennonites.
One can easily find a statement teaching that one should not kill, which was used to make a law against murder. No matter what circumstance killing is wrong. So, why are we killing criminals? Aren’t we basically acting against the laws within our own constitution? We are not only killing, but also the government contradicts itself because people have rights in which they are protected. The lives of every individual living on American land should be safe, and if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    death penalty

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Specific deterrence- punishment of a crime that prevents the offender from repeating the same offense again.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>In The Bible, there is a statement that says "Thou shalt not kill," and yet the government believes it can punish for what it already does. It is a crime within a crime and the government should "Practice what they preach." This has been going on for so long that most nations have created a numbness to death.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In his paper, “The Minimal Invasion Argument Against the Death Penalty”, Hugo Adam Bedau argues against the death penalty. Bedau’s purpose is to convince people to favor the lifetime imprisonment over the death penalty with an argument that had been previously used by other authors called “The minimal Invasion Argument”, which he considers to be “the best argument against the death penalty”(Bedau, 4). In this paper I will describe Bedau’s argument and show how he has some weaknesses addressing the concept of the minimal invasion argument by ignoring what in my opinion is the main reason why the death penalty has not been abolished; this reason being our incapacity as humans to “define” our environment. When we call one thing by a name we believe this thing is the name by which we have called it. For example when we call somebody a criminal we take away many of the characteristics that make us equal to the criminal and then just call him or her a criminal. With this essay I want to prove that in some cases as human beings we need to believe in re-definition, in change; all this in order to build a better society. To do this I will first explain Bedau’s argument as best as possible and then conclude with the issues I found on it that are based on our language as the interpreter of our world.…

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment (death penalty) violates the United States Constitution. According to the 8th Amendment's prohibition against "cruel and unusual" punishments are inflicted. The death penalty is retribution, involves inhumane procedures, and it is an unfair way to solve problems. the death penslty is not a good way to serve justice.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Title: Point: Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished. By: Ballaro, Beverly, Cushman, C. Ames, Points of View: Death Penalty, 2009 Database: Points of View Reference Center…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The mother of a teenager killed during a shooting rampage at a Chuck E. Cheese restaurant in Aurora in 1993 is begging the governor to let convicted killer Nathan Dunlap die. "Sit back, make no decision, allow the one that 12 people made after listening to all the evidence 17 years ago stand," said Sandi Rogers in a statement sent to Gov. John Hickenlooper. Sandi 's son, Ben Grant, was 17 years old when he was shot and killed with his co-workers. Dunlap had been fired from the restaurant before he came back and shot five people at closing time. Four died, one survived. Ben had only worked at the restaurant for three weeks before the shooting. Sandi said Ben didn 't even know Dunlap. "He 'd never met the guy, he 'd never even seen the guy before," Sandi said back in 1993. Ben 's family and friends said he was a bright, strong, funny young man. "He never got to get married, and have children, he never got to see the world," Sandi said. The sole survivor of a mass shooting in 1993 is tired of talking about the man who changed his life forever. “Every time I have to speak on this, it re-opens wounds,” said Bobby Stephens. Stephens was 20 at the time of the shooting. He was picking up some extra hours at the Chuck E. Cheese restaurant where he worked when gunman Nathan Dunlap came in to rob the store. Dunlap shot and killed Sylvia Crowell, 19; Ben Grant, 17; Colleen O’Connor, 17; and Margaret Kohlberg, 50. Dunlap also shot Bobby Stephens in the face, but didn’t kill him. Stephens lay wounded and bleeding until the robbery was over. Dunlap was convicted and sentenced to death for his crimes. Now, 20 years later, Dunlap learned he will live at least a while longer. Gov. John Hickenlooper announced on May 22, 2013 he’s granting a temporary reprieve of Dunlap’s execution. Capital punishment, also dubbed the “death penalty” is the premeditated and planned taking of a human life by a government in a response to a crime committed by that legally…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The death penalty is an age-old punishment where a person is put to death for certain serious crimes such as murder. This punishment is intended to make potential murderers think twice before killing someone out of fear of losing their own life. Personally, I agree with the death penalty because, for a civilized society, preventing murder should be a priority. The death penalty is the most severe punishment available, as it takes a person’s life away, and in addition to serving as punishment, it also serves as a means of preventing the criminal from committing further crime. This punishment, in name alone, is an indicator of just how detrimental the individual’s crime really was.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty in the United States is inflicted upon criminals by the state as punishment for an offence. This method of punishment dates back to the beginning of recorded history. Various primitive tribal histories indicate that the death penalty was a part of many ancient justice systems (Wikipedia). Nowadays, it is primarily used in cases where someone commits murder. Some people think that capital punishment deters crime and prevents convicted criminals from committing greater offences, but this idea is false. It has been debated for a long time because it is a poor way of punishing murderers. Execution in the United States violates human rights and is not the most effective way to inflict justice. Examination proves this point. The death penalty clearly violates human rights, is not an effective means of preventing other crimes and is very expensive.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A perfect example of the death penalty going awry is the state of Illinois. Former governor George Ryan has put a stay on all executions. This came as a result of finding thirteen death row inmates not guilty of their convicted crimes. Also, by staying executions, Illinois is not spending the three hundred million dollars to almost three hundred men and women to death row in the past twenty two years (Ryan 14). That is a ridiculous amount of money to send only three hundred to death row, making it approximately one million dollars a person. Those people make up only two percent of all convicted murders in Illinois (Ryan 14). This leaves ninety eight percent of killers in jail. Why are only three hundred people acceptable to kill when the other ninety eight percent are not? In New York as well, prosecutors have only sought capital punishment in twelve out of one hundred ninety eight possible cases. They have found that the penalty of life without the chance of parole works well, and have come to prefer it (Shipp).…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “Forgiving violence does not mean condoning violence. There are only two alternatives to forgiving violence: revenge, or adopting an attitude of never-ending bitterness and anger. For too long we have treated violence with violence, and that's why it never ends.” (Coretta Scott King, Widow of Martin Luther King) Capital Punishment should be considered cruel and unusual punishment. The Catholic Church is adamantly opposed to the death penalty. The death penalty should be banned as long as there are non-lethal means to defend and protect the people’s safety.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    Roy Brown is a conservative who believes in individual rights and the right to life. He believes there is no deeper violation of a citizen’s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness than the government killing them when they’re actually innocent. With the use of the death penalty, mistakes are highly inescapable (Brown 1).…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Capital punishment or the death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The judicial decree that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence, while the actual process of killing the person is an execution. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term capital originates from the Latin capitalis, literally "regarding the head" (referring to execution by beheading).…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty has been most talked about for years, to some it is an unfair way to pass judgment on a person. The argument went as far as to say that conforming to such a method is a step backwards and offers no real solution. Critic Coretta Scott King argued strongly against the practice and rebukes the idea. One can always say what they want about the matter but insufficient knowledge with hinder their judgment. The death penalty ought to be considered as a means of punishment for those who commit ghastly murders.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Consider if you will, one of our Ten Commandments which states, “Thou shalt not kill." Is the death penalty not violating this commandment? In our society, it is definitely necessary to punish criminals so they will learn the lesson and not commit the crimes again. However, capital punishment is too extreme. There are people who believe it is fair to kill someone that had killed others and people who think it goes against society’s moral beliefs to take a life. The death penalty should be abolished because the mentally ill or innocent could be put to death, it violates the eighth amendment, the death penalty is biased based on the person’s race and economic standing, and costs more money than it would take for a life sentence.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays