Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Death and Passive Euthanasia

Good Essays
1220 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death and Passive Euthanasia
Outline

The argument comes down to whether a patient has the legal right to ask their doctor to help them die when the end of life is near and the suffering is severe. I believe that if a person is terminally ill, and is in immense amounts of pain, that it is their legal right, to end their life prematurely, with their doctor's assistance.

I. The different types of euthanasia
A. Passive euthanasia: acceleration of death by the removal of life support
B. Active euthanasia: a doctor directly assists in the death of a person
C. Physician Assisted Suicide: physician supplies the resources for committing suicide

II. An example of euthanasia A. Article, "It's Over Debbie"

III. Legalization of euthanasia
A. Euthanasia is legal in Japan, the Netherlands, and Oregon
B. Bills to make euthanasia have been denied in the United States

IV. Netherlands guidelines for euthanasia
A. It must be voluntary
B. Requests must not be made on impulse or based on depression
C. The pain must be considered unacceptable suffering
D. A second opinion must be had
E. A well documented report must be written by the doctor

V. Religious aspects of euthanasia
A. Conservative group beliefs vs. liberal group beliefs
B. What God says about euthanasia

VI. Survey of terminally ill cancer patients
A. Cancer patients are the largest group to accept euthanasia

VII. When euthanasia is used
A. Only with people who are terminally ill and who are suffering

VIII. My opinion on euthanasia
A. A person has the freedom to choose what they do with their life
B. Euthanasia is not suicide
C. It is the patients free will to decide how their life is ended

Whether to permit euthanasia is among the most argumentative legal and public policy questions in America today. The argument comes down to whether a patient has the legal right to ask their doctor to help them die when the end of life is near and the suffering is severe. I believe that if a person is terminally ill, and is in immense amounts of pain, that it is their legal right, to end their life prematurely, with their doctor's assistance.
The word euthanasia originated from the Greek language: "eu means ‘good' and thanatos means ‘death'" (Article, "Euthanasia"). The meaning of the word is "the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies." (Article, "Euthanasia"). When people hear the word euthanasia they usually think its meaning is either the termination of life at the patient's request, or as the Nazi extermination program of murder.
Passive euthanasia is the acceleration of death for a person by removing some form of support and letting nature take its course. An example of passive euthanasia is the removal of life support, (a respirator) and therefore allowing a person to die. This procedure is performed on people with massive brain damage who are in a coma and cannot possibly regain consciousness.
Active Euthanasia is where a person asks a doctor to directly assist them in dying. These patients are usually terminally ill, and suffering tremendously, and they want a quick, painless exit from life. A famous promoter of this is Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a Michigan physician. He claims to have assisted in more than 130 suicides. His method is to inject a controlled substance into a patient, therefore causing death.
Physician Assisted Suicide, or voluntary passive euthanasia, is where a physician supplies the resources for committing suicide to a person, so that they can terminate their own life. The physician will usually give a prescription for a lethal dose of sleeping pills, or a supply of carbon monoxide gas. Dr. Kevorkian has also used this method, he provides a f
In 1992, the Journal of the American Medical Association printed an anonymous article entitled "It's Over Debbie." The article describes how the author administered a lethal injection to a terminally ill cancer patient, whom he had never met. Since it was anonymous, we don't know if it was a true story, or if it was fabricated to open the people's eyes to what euthanasia is. e the first state in the United States to legalize euthanasia. Many states, including Arizona, California, Michigan, and Rhode Island, have introduced bills to legalize euthanasia, but so far none have passed.
The Netherlands has the most liberal euthanasia guidelines of anywhere that it is legal. The following are the guidelines that must be followed: the patient must make the request voluntarily and not under the pressure from others. Requests will not be excepted if made on impulse or if based on depression. Also the patient must be experiencing a pain that is considered unbearable. There must also be a second opinion by another physician. And lastly a report must be written describing the patient's history, and why the decision was made.
A number of religious organizations have issued statements on euthanasia declaring where they stand on the issue. Official church policies usually oppose euthanasia. Conservative religious groups tend to be vocal in their opposition to euthanasia. The Roman Catholic Church is strongly against the legalization euthanasia. Liberal religious groups like, Methodists, Presbyterians, and Quakers, tend to lean in favor of the individuals right to choose.
Conservative religious groups say that euthanasia violates a person's natural desire to live, and also that life is a gift from God, and only God should be allowed to end that life. They also say that God will not give a person anything that they cannot handle, and that suffering is a punishment for one's sins.
Recently Keith G. Wilson, PhD, from The Rehabilitation Center, Ottawa, Canada surveyed 70 terminally ill cancer patients. 73% of the patients said that euthanasia should be legalized because of the pain and their right to chose. 58% said that in the near future they would, most likely, want to make a request for an accelerated death. "They felt more hopelessness and they had more desire to die." (Cancer Weekly)
Euthanasia is only to be used with people that have no hope, and no desire to live anymore, it is both physical and mental. Euthanasia would be used for a person who just simply wants to die with dignity before they become very sick. The people that would fall into this group are people who have the diseases Multiple Sclerosis, AIDS, Alzheimer's, etc. They don't want to prolong the inevitable, and be in pain for an unknown time period.
I think that a person has the freedom to choose what they do with there life. And if that person is terminally ill, and is in so much pain that they cannot function as they did before the illness, they have the right to end their life in a dignified manor. I am not a supporter of suicide, but I do not think that euthanasia is a form of suicide. It is a way to die without suffering. Not just anyone is able to die by euthanasia, there are strict guidelines that must be followed, and only those that fit the description are allowed to follow through with it. Again it is by the patients free will to choose this way to end their life, and no one else's!

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that euthanasia is a patient’s right. According to ProCon.org, “… a terminally ill person has a protected liberty interest in choosing to end intolerable suffering by bringing about his or her own death” (ProCon.org, “Top 10 Pros and Cons”). Claiming that everyone has the right to choose their death. The website also went deeper into the matter by bringing the Hippocratic Oath, “do no harm” (ProCon.org, “Top 10 Pros and Cons”). It…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 7664 Words
    • 31 Pages

    In today's society, one of the most controversial issues is physician-assisted suicide for the terminally ill. Many people feel that it is wrong for people, regardless of their health condition, to ask their health care provider to end their life; while others feel it is their right to be able to choose how and when they die. When a physician is asked to help a patient into death, they have many responsibilities that come along with that single question. Among those responsibilities are: providing valid information as to the terminal illness the patient is suffering, educating the patient as to what their final options may be, making the decision of whether or not to help the patient into death, and also if they do decide to help, providing the lethal dose of medication that will end the patient's life. For those who believe physician-assisted suicide should be their choice, they feel it should be legalized because: they don't want to go through the suffering caused by the terminal illness; they fear the loss of their autonomy (independence); becoming a burden to their family or friends, and also the fear of dying alone. One the other hand those opposed to assisted suicide feel it goes against religious beliefs and medical ethics. They also believe that there is always the possibility that a miracle will occur and the patient will overcome the illness and also that the doctor could have provided the wrong prognosis/diagnosis to the patient. The strongest reason against physician-assisted suicide has been the idea that if assisted suicide becomes legal, it will get out of hand and target certain people in society, such as those with disabilities, or certain races.…

    • 7664 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this dissertation we will explore active and passive euthanasia, the brouhaha surrounding the two and which one is appropriate and morally sound for modern times. James Rachel has written a very poignant supposition on active and passive euthanasia. Though many disagree with him on the appropriateness of the practice as it relates to humans and what is considered alive. Some believe that one is dead when the brain is dead or in a comatose state.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physician assisted suicide, or euthanasia has been a very serious debate for at least a decade now. It was brought to the main stage in 1998 with the arrest of Dr. Kevorkian, whom helped at least 100 terminally ill patients commit suicide. If this was actually morally and ethically wrong are very hard questions for some and a very easy for others. If someone is terminally ill or really just does not belong in this world, then who really gets to decide if they get to live or die. The American College of Physicians along with many political and religious groups all finds this to raise serious ethical and other concerns.…

    • 2669 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia as defined by the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is a quiet and easy death. One may wonder, is there such a thing as a quiet and easy death? This is one point that I will discuss in my paper, however the question that my paper will answer is; should active euthanasia be legalized? First, I will look at Philippa Foot's article on Euthanasia and discuss my opinions on it. Second, I will look at James Rachel's article on active and passive euthanasia and discuss why I agree with his argument. Finally, I will conclude by saying that while the legalizing of active euthanasia would benefit many people, it would hurt too many, thus I believe that it should not be legalized.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Euthanasia”, “mercy killing”, and “physically assisted suicide” – no matter what it is called – they all mean the same thing: ending a person’s life who is in a vegetative state or who is suffering from terminal illness, in order to relieve the subject of pain and suffering associated with their condition. But the main question is, is euthanasia right? Everyone dies, and if a person is terminally ill, then they should have the right to decide to pass away without the suffering.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Emanuel, E. J. (1994). The History of Euthanasia Debates in the United States and Britain. Annals of Internal Medicine.…

    • 2720 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate on killing versus letting die is a difficult topic to address due to the emotional weight of the subject and the challenge presented by taking a purely rational approach to assessing the resulting moral implications. Using a bare difference argument allows us to see that there is no difference between the two when it comes down to either actively taking part in another person’s death or passively allowing it to happen. In this paper I will explain how Rachel’s use of the bare difference argument as a method works to support his conclusion, as well as argue why his bare difference argument of Smith and Jones effectively supports the thesis that killing is no worse than letting die.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why should doctors, lawmakers, ethicists, or anyone else claim to know what is best for them? They don’t know what the person is going through, or how much they are suffering. The patients go through all the needle pokes, side effects, and weaknesses. It is their decision; they have the right to decide what to do with their life. Why have a person who is suffering lie in bed waiting to die? What is the good thing about that? They are not enjoying their life; they have a sudden hope of just dying. That intentionally becomes the thing they’d most wish upon anything. There have been many cases where families began to notice their loved ones suffering and fought for the right to remove them from life support. Although, the government began granting families wishes in 1990, only 4 out of 5 people would be granted the wish to die. In order for the government to consider patients for assisted suicide they wanted evidence from the patient. They wanted to make sure that this is what the patient desired. "Because it is impossible to know how much another person is suffering, only the dying patient can make such a serious decision. “If there was no proof of a patients wish to die the government would not grant the families wishes.”(Torr). This is why the most important requirement for euthanasia to be justified is that the dying patient specifically requests it" (Torr). "The central question…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with James Rachels’ Active and Passive Euthanasia, and I wish to provide further support for those premises. Rachel’s argues that killing is not in itself any worse than letting someone die. Active euthanasia is not any worse than passive euthanasia. An example of how Active euthanasia is killing is when one helps another by providing the right medication and dosage instructions to put that person to death. An example of Passive euthanasia is allowing a person to die by starving or not giving treatment needed to keep the patient alive. They are to be treated the same because the intentions and ending result are the same. There is no difference between these since they both end in death.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assisted Suicide Cons

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page

    Assisted suicide is a challenging topic to debate on because it is solely based on one’s personal opinion. The argument in favor of the right to assisted suicide is that it is not up to doctors to make decisions that disregard the rights of sick patients. Patients have the right to make any choice they want and stick up for their dignity. Their right includes the ability to choose assisted suicide and die on their own terms. Along those lines, having access to physician-assisted suicide allows the patient to maintain control over his or her situation which lets them end their life in an ethical and humane manner. People that are against assisted suicide argue that the medical field doesn’t have the right to assist in a patients death, but…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician-assisted death is the act of intentionally providing medical patients with the measures to be able to commit suicide. The requirements behind this medical procedure usually include a patient who is terminally ill and consenting to the procedure. The method to perform this procedure is through a lethal dosage of drugs prescribed by a physician. However, to individuals in the United States, the procedure is constantly borderlining on whether it can be classified as relief from dying or murder.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you were told you had a terminally ill disease and only had one more year to live, filled with suffering, what would you chose to do? This question leads us to the sensitive and controversial topic of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Euthanasia can simply be defined as physician-assisted death for terminally ill patients. This issue has stirred debates that have drawn attention to the complex issues concerning the ethical implications of end-of-life care. Supporters of euthanasia argue that they seek only to prevent unnecessary suffering while the critics maintain that it is unethical to end an individual’s life. However, many public opinions have reported that over 80% of the general population support amendments in the law to…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia has recently been an active topic of debate due to elevated rate of patients diagnosed with painful and incurable illnesses. In James Rachel’s article, “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” he speaks of the invalid and impractical practice of passive euthanasia, which is endorsed by the American Medical Association. For many that are unfamiliar, euthanasia is the practice of painlessly killing a patient who is suffering for a painful and incurable disease. Rachel emphasises the unclear difference between active and passive killing in the medical world. The topics I would like to analyze from the article are first, the difference between active and passive euthanasia and the many relevant and irrelevant factors associated…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays