Preview

DBQ Jeffersonian vs. Federalists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
DBQ Jeffersonian vs. Federalists
DBQ During the time period of 1801 to 1817, there were multiple issues in the United States ranging from wars to political boundaries. This time period saw the termination of the Federalist party. The conflicts were between two parties called the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Federalist party was officially started by John Adams. John Adams was also a loose constructionist just like all the other Federalists. Federalists were in favor of a strong central government. On the other side, was Thomas Jefferson who was in office from 1801 to 1809. Jefferson started the Jeffersonian Republican party. The Jeffersonians were strict constructionists who believed in states rights. They said that anything that is not stated in the Constitution, is reserved for the states to decide. However, this was not always the case. The statement that the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists is partly accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. While any party is in office, that party will almost always be loose constructionists because each party in office wants more power. The Jeffersonians started out as strict constructionists but slowly turned into loose constructionists because they were in office for twenty years. The Jeffersonians were actually strict constructionists before Jefferson was elected in 1801. For example, the Jeffersonians did not like the idea of a national bank. They thought that banks are reserved for the states because there is nothing in the Constitution that states that the federal government can create a national bank. Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist who proposed the First Bank of the United States, was appointed as the first Secretary of Treasury. He thought that a national bank would help to improve the nation’s credit. Jefferson and Madison were opposed due to that a national bank mainly benefited merchants and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 10 Concepts

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson- was the Secretary of State. When Alexander Hamilton wanted to create a new national bank, Jefferson adamantly spoke against it. He felt it would violate states rights by causing a huge competitor for the state banks, then causing a federal monopoly. Jefferson's argument was that since the Constitution did not say Congress could create a bank they should not be given that power. This is the philosophy of strict construction. Thomas Jefferson's beliefs led to the creation of the political party, Democratic Republicans. They believed in an extremely weak central government, no special privileges for special classes, especially manufacturers, and did not believe in letting every white male the ability to vote, only those intelligent enough to make wise decisions.…

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson and Madison felt that the national bank was unconstitutional, they fully supported it. Jefferson felt that supporting the national bank would avoid a political war between parties. He also believed that destroying all of the Federalists ideas would upset them and cause the country to divide into the political parties. Madison carried over Jefferson's beliefs to keep peace and continue what Jefferson began, although the bank was considered unconstitutional. Madison and Jefferson were both viewed by the Federalists as hypocrites because of their fickle loose or tight construction beliefs of the constitution. Although Jefferson and Madison both went against their political parties, they were doing it to benefit the country as a…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The perception that Federalists were loose constructionists and that Jeffersonian Republicans were very strict constructionists was very well founded, but not accurate 100% of the time. The presidency of Thomas Jefferson mainly supported the theory that the Jeffersonian Republicans were strict constructionists. James Madison's presidency supported that theory as well. Both presidents, however, made exceptions to their general policies when an issue was just too big to fit inside the tiny box of their shared school of thought.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeffersonian Republicans were often portrayed as strict constructionalists and the Federalists were considered broad constructionalists, but this characterization was untrue in many ways. Between 1801 and 1817 their primary beliefs on economics, military, and the judicial branch seemed to change completely.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson was against taxes that fell deeply on Agrarian farmers, and challenged the mass producing notions of Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson violently loathed the First Bank of the United States, which was founded by Alexander Hamilton, which did not help southerners who basically lived by working on farms, whose agricultural industry did not need centrally focused banks. The bank over time faded away over time after being established for twenty years, however, Hamilton did not let anything put an end to what he created so he brought it back five years later.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He sought to use Britain’s economic model to create a nation that would one day be as influential as Britain. To do this, Hamilton would have to create a federal bank that would handle the economy and fund a strong government. He knew the United States would have secure currency that everyone trusted if the Bank of the United States was authorized. Hamilton believed that a bank was necessary for the advancement of the U.S. He said. “The powers contained in a constitution. . . ought to be construed liberally in advancement of the public good.” Jefferson had quite the opposite views on the Bank of the United States. He was against the idea of the bank because it would centralize powers in the big northern cities. Jefferson also feared that the banks would only benefit the rich. He did not believe that Congress had the power to create the Bank of the Unites States. Jefferson defended his beliefs by saying, “The second general phrase is to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the enumerated powers. But they can all be carried into execution without a bank. A bank therefore is not necessary, and consequently not authorized by this phrase”. Hamilton and Jefferson also…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the 1800's, Jeffersonian Republicans thought that the federal government’s power was confined to the grants of the Constitution. On the other hand, the Federalists believed in the broad construction that gave the government any power that was not forbidden by the constitution. Despite the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans believe in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, and Federalists believe in a loose interpretation, these beliefs were misrepresented according to the party’s views on the authority of the government during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. During this time, the Jeffersonian Republicans beliefs were inverted with the beliefs of the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans leaned toward a loose interpretation and the Federalists leaned toward a strict one.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was the last Federalist president which led to the next 16 years of Thomas Jefferson as president for two terms and James Madison as president for two terms. Jefferson and Madison were members of the Republican Party, which had principles and philosophies that were very different than the views of the Federalists. Jefferson and Madison each abandoned the Republican philosophies for Federalism. Jefferson and Madison took on Federalist views while being President of the United States. However, Jefferson and Madison each picked somewhere to stand their ground and keep some of their Republican views.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two of the most influential brilliant minds of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. Although, Jefferson and Hamilton disagreed with each other continually, their different viewpoints developed the two most prominent branches of government leading to the separation of powers between state and central government. Hamilton was a strong outspoken federalist that believed the average people were not intelligent enough to make decisions the government makes, as oppose to Jefferson who believed the government should be ran by the people.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jeffersonian Republicanism (1801-1809): The Dominant and rival political party after the decline of Hamilton Federalism. They believed in a limited government, accountability of public officials, dispersal of power, and LIBERTY and EDUCATION for the individual (both more important than security). Their political philosophy was one of nature and nurture. The party feared the urban class, they believed cities were corrupted. They praise the yeoman independent farmer and independent citizen. In fact, Jefferson believed that a “good society” was an agrarian society. Moderate nationalism, narrow localism, but a strict constructionist. Jefferson and his Republican party believe that government only had GRANTED (enumerated) powers, NOT implied powers. They imposed a lassie-faire type of government, “Government is best by which governs the least”. Central Political Statement of the Jeffersonian: “The ENDS of government, NOT the means”. Jefferson idealized the independent family farmer as God’s chosen people. Agriculture was the righteous way of life according to Jefferson. The party believed in a populist form of government, where the majority of the people are involved, not just the elite class. They believed that in order to achieve a true democratic state, the people needed to be EDUCATED, “To be free, you must be educated” – T.J. (Disclaimer: Not all, only white man that own land). They passed the Judiciary Act of 1801 to get rid of Federalists in the Judiciary Branch. According to Hofstadter, Jefferson was more a PRACTICAL man, than an ideal who was influenced by the environment. He was raised in an agricultural environment and developed a fear of the urban class and the cities and also feared of slavery. He believed that farmers were moral incorruptible. Jefferson looked at the Constitution for what government COULD do, as opposed to Hamiltonian Federalism who looked at the Constitution to see what government couldn’t do. However, towards the end of his…

    • 4658 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many different views on how to run the government, it was hard to depict which parties’ group would be the strongest and the best fit to control the country: the Federalists’ or the Democratic-Republicans. The Federalists’ wanted a very strong government to bring together the bickering states. On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans pictured more independent state governments to rule the people. Although they didn’t agree on many things they did have one idea in common, such as, both parties wanted to follow the Constitution, but in different ways.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson strived to attain an efficient economy, and broaden the country’s territory. Jefferson’s anti-federalist stance determined reduced government spending on the military. He felt that if the government were to be involved in the daily lives of citizens, then they should avoid taxing the people. He cut government spending on the army and navy because he believed that it was illogical to spend money on something that was not apparent of happening. Furthermore, his beliefs of small centralized government initiated the idea that to procure a large military would commence war. By regulating military spending, the government was capable of focusing on other aspects of economic spending. Jefferson felt that government spending on the military…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the period between its proposal in September 1787 and ratification in 1789, the United States Constitution was the subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to be governed by a republic, the constitution included no bill of rights, and the federal judiciary was vaguely defined and could become too powerful. Each of these arguments is worthy of attention as an examination of the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the proposed Constitution.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays