Preview

Day of Empire Chap 1-4 Anaylsis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2008 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Day of Empire Chap 1-4 Anaylsis
Summer Reading Essay In the research/analysis novel Day of Empire, the author, Amy Chua, discusses her thesis of how hyperpowers (empires or nations that had a command that stretched to all corners of the known world in the known world of their respective times) all rose to dominance through tolerance and fell in power through intolerance. Through the introduction and Part One, Chua effectively communicates how the various hyperpowers of history all rose in might through their effective and strategic use of tolerance and acceptance of the different people that came to exist under their control. She also explains how the mighty empires fell through intolerance and lack of an overlying figurehead to which the people could become loyal to. From her research, she is able to support her thesis with the history of the great empires described in Part One.
Chapter 1 focused on the first hyperpower in history: the Achaemenids, rulers of one of the greatest empires to exist. Founded by Cyrus the Great and ending with Darius III (about 559 to 330 B.C.) it is regarded as being one of the most culturally diverse and successful empires to exist. The Empire came to this strength mainly through the effects of their emperors Cyrus and Darius, both being regarded as tactical, effective, and efficient rulers. A major component that was instrumental to the rise of the Achaemenids was the diversity and acceptance of other languages and religions, not just the Persian language and religion. Due to this, the subjects were able to live their lives as before, with the exception of paying taxes and being subject to the terms of the Empire. For example, Cyrus is noted for his style of “decapitation” of leadership, in which he replaces the local head of an area with one of the Persian aristocracy (a satrap), and otherwise kept himself out of the daily lives of the subjects. Rising in power through tolerance and expansion, it fell through the intolerance and violence that Chua included in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author Amy Chua shows to the reader the different empires and how they expanded and fell. She explains in each chapter how tolerance is the key to successes for every hyper power.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Amy Chua’s thesis in Day of Empire is that the biggest contributing factor of the demise of hyperpowers throughout history is the loss of tolerance by the ruling entity. She believes that when the hyperpowers begin to decline they begin to blame everything on the outsiders. Sometimes this is caused by a regime change or a ruler’s search for a scapegoat. Her theory states that this intolerance causes social unrest and rebellion by the oppressed groups.…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does Shah mean? “King of kings” 8. What one word describes the Safavid culture? Persians…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Day of Empire” by Amy Chua begins to discuss the overall topic of how hyperpowers rise and more importantly how they fall throughout history. The thesis shows that the hyperpowers were “extraordinarily pluralistic and tolerant during its rise to preeminence”. Tolerance is by far the biggest reason the hyperpowers of that time including, the Mongolians, the Spanish, the Romans, the British, the Chinese and even the hyperpowers of present time got to where they are.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The classical empires experienced periods of great power by centralization of power and establishing belief systems to maintain power over their empire. This is true for both Han China and Mauryan India. Both of these classical empires were very successful in the ancient world because they were able to expand and create strong political policies to keep their empires strong and stable. While both Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India built distinct political structure to ensure that their officials were implementing their policies, Han China and Mauryan India used belief systems as techniques to ensure that there was order in their empires.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    b) During the sixth century BCE, rulers of the province of Persia in southwest Iran embarked on a series of conquests that led to the formation of an enormous empire.…

    • 2839 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Babylonian king known as Hammurabi will forever be remembered throughout history for being a diplomat, builder of temples, and a lawgiver, that epitomizes Mesopotamian society. In this paper, multiple aspects of Hammurabi and Babylonian society will be addressed. First, how Hammurabi took an insignificant city-state and through a series of wars with neighboring kingdoms, made it into a powerful empire which would control all of Mesopotamia. Second, how he realized that his empire needed control and order since it was so diverse that he formed a set of laws which would prove to the gods and people that he was doing his job to uphold justice and also to inform citizens of their rights. Evidence suggests that its purpose may also have been…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Emperor of China and Rome’s Augustus Caesar both helped shape their kingdoms into great empires, but their tactics in doing so are every different. The First emperor of China took a more direct approach to his leadership. He concurred all the land around him and changed many laws to restrict his citizens from freedoms. Augustus Caesar was considered a peoples person and often attended live shows and plays. He believed that thru peace and harmony his country would be able to thrive. These great leaders both achieved dominance and power throughout their leadership but only one of them died as a hero while the other died as a hated man. In this paper I will compare and contrast the ways these leaders shaped their countries and the effect it had on the way their people viewed them.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The empires in Rome and China were wildly successful in consolidating power and expanding their influence because they used a strong central government, technology, and cultural unity in spite of the fact that they were located on opposite sides of the globe. Thus it is evident that these factors are the most critical pieces to successful create strong…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peace through authoritarian rule a. Emperors portrayed themselves as civil rulers b. Abuses of power c. Military as government D. Town and city life 1. Local administration through urban centers 2. Rome comparable only with Han capitals 3.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Persian Emperor Paries lll, was brightly intelligent and his army outnumbered Alexander’s. By surprise Alexander denied the offer from Emperor to surrender all the Persian Empire west of Euphrates, and proceeded to invade the rest of Persia. Alexander mind was set on one thing only; that was to conquer the entire empire, which was just what he did. Persian grew a massive love for Alexander once the made the attempt to merge the Greek and Persian cultures, but they we’re both holding important positions. By doing so this caused him a lot of hardship once he begins to rule the former Persian Empire. Even though he adopted the Persians ways of governing; while keeping the Greek cultural ways. Alexander looked to create a new-found life with the empire, but not to exclude, but those in Greece started to resent him while the was away in Persia. The attention that Alexander showed the Persians, made those in Greece feel jealous a d the citizens began to…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire and Pp

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12. Define “democracy” (as it existed in Ancient Greece”) and “oligarchy” (Chapter 4, pp. 107).…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In ancient time, in order to expand their empires and accumulate properties, many successful emperors or leaders usually conquered other places through strong military forces. Someone then concludes that “the most successful ancient empires were able to maintain hegemony over conquered peoples with little or no thought to anything besides military power.” However, a successful emperor, such as Alexander the Great, Ashoka, and Han Wudi, did not gain the political control of the conquered regions through military force, but adopted more complicated and efficient methods such as controlling or eliciting peoples’s thoughts through education, making strict laws and assimilation—adapting cultures of conquered areas as well as diffusing its own culture…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anatysis 1

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When I think of myself with an individual identity, the number one is being a father. Being a dad is important to me because I didn’t know my real father growing up. I knew who he was and where he lived but, there was no contact at all. I was raised by my step-father and mother. My step dad is a good man who took very good care of us. I don’t think I could asked for a better role model. So being there for my children is important to me. Secondly, I am a former Marine and combat veteran. I value integrity, honor, and loyalty. Having a good name is of great importance. You are evaluated by your peers or public by things you have done or accomplished in this life. Even though there are things that I deal with as result of being a veteran, I would not change a thing. Serving and protecting people is close to my heart.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays