Preview

David Hume: Matters Of Fact And Relations Of Ideas

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
466 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume: Matters Of Fact And Relations Of Ideas
David Hume, a philosopher that lived in the eighteenth century gathered impressions and made up believes. He believed that these ideas were a part of the human mind. This philosopher believed in: resemblance, contiguity in time and in cause and effect. Resemblance is when a connection that leads us to remember a moment that took place. Contiguity of time and place is the moment that makes you come across a memory that was connected to the instance. The experiences gained lead to cause and effect. But Hume thought deeply about his beliefs and put in a lot of effort to make his words seem like they make sense.
Humes has two kinds of judgments: matter of fact and relations of idea. Matters of fact are known to be true based of experience. A relation of ideas deals is connected with two ideas in a way, which they cannot be untrue. These two ideas are connected with cause and effect. If you were to get hurt, you would know the next time to be more careful from the thing that cause you to get injured. So according to to the knowledge that is created after an experience, it is known to be the principal of cause and effect.
According to Hume, matter of facts can never be certain of. Though we see the sun rising up every …show more content…
The ideas of matters of facts and relations of ideas both came from matters of fact because they are simply true statements that are concepts visible to everyone and definitions of words in the sentences. The relationship between cause and effect is realistic and experienced, which leads to series of phenomenon that are connected to his fundamentals: matters of facts and relations of ideas. He studied human nature and observed how our experiences and beliefs are connected to why we believe in what we do. Matter of facts originate from impressions of memory, while relation of ideas comes from definition of the two ideas
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain Hume’s Criticisms of the Cosmological Arguments. [25 Marks]
    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain Hume’s Criticisms of the Cosmological Arguments. [25 Marks]

    Hume maintained his criticism of Paley’s analogy of the watch by an analogy of his own. This analogy said that we can conclude that a house had a builder and an architect but we cannot,…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Hume's Powerful Ideas: An Analysis
    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    David Hume's Powerful Ideas: An Analysis

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    turn; having brung about uncertainty in proposition what be found to be truth or false. It is impossible…

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast David Hume's Theory Of Skepticism
    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast David Hume's Theory Of Skepticism

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's Version Of Empiricism
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Hume's Version Of Empiricism

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Psyc 4100
    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Psyc 4100

    Rychlak, J. F. (1998). Is there an unrecognized teleology in Hume 's analysis of causation?. Journal Of Theoretical And Philosophical Psychology, 18(1), 52-60.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hume's Sympathy Analysis
    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page

    Hume's Sympathy Analysis

    There have been a number of challenges questioning Hume’s sympathy. Some questioned the subjectivity of sympathy, since there should be an objective basis for moral evaluation, and sentiments, being the product of sympathy which is subjective to some extent, is not entirely an objective basis for moral evaluation. Some others challenged Hume with the “virtue in rags” argument, which suggests that sometimes good motives do not bring about pleasure in anyone, but we still approve of such motives, which is inexplicable by Hume’s sympathy. Another challenge is called the weak sympathy problem, which challenges Hume’s sympathy by pointing out that Hume only allows us to sympathize with others at a particular instant, and the object of sympathy is…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume As A Constitutive Of Personal Identity
    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Hume As A Constitutive Of Personal Identity

    The view of interest here holds to the objection that personal identity is anything but ubiquitous, but rather the set of characteristics in question form a personality, which a person merely possesses as a holding, a constitutive of personal consciousness. On this view, a person can change their personality without having their identity annihilated in the strict sense implied by Hume, because one’s personality as well as the personality traits is constitutive of personal identity. Based on how this idea has been refined in recent paragraphs, I propose we rename it personality as a constitutive of personal identity or personality as a constitutive for short. The basis for personality as a constitutive has been that personal identity as a static…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    AQA AS Philosophy Reason and Experience Key Points
    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    AQA AS Philosophy Reason and Experience Key Points

    Locke argues that there is no truth that everyone, including idiots and children, assents to – so no truth is innate.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descarte's causal argument
    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descarte's causal argument

    This then leads Descartes to put the causal principle and ideas together, establishing causal principle ideas. Descartes asks if the cause of the idea of something can be a mode. As stated above, the cause of an effect must have more reality that the effect itself. An idea…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    David Hume: A Famous Philosopher
    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages

    David Hume: A Famous Philosopher

    Things that constitute Matters of Fact can be rejected without that rejection resulting in a contradiction. In short, these objects of human reason are not certain and can not be derived from logically or rationally reflecting on a concept. With this being said, Matters of Fact can be understood to be those things that are a posteriori, which means knowledge or justifications that can is dependent upon experience or empirical evidence. An example of a Matter of Fact is the statement that Earth is the third planet from the sun. One can not know this fact by simply reflecting on Earth and the solar system. There is nothing about the Earth or the solar system that is contingent upon the Earth to be the third plant from the sun. As a result, no one can know that the Earth is the third planet from the sun without viewing with a telescope that this happening is the case. Another example of this is the statement that it is raining outside. One can not simply reflect on the concept of rain to conclude that it is raining outside. Hence, in order to know that it is raining outside one has to go to the door or window to observe that it is raining outside. In addition to this, if someone where to reject the fact that it is raining outside, that rejection has an equal ability of being true or false upon that person’s observation of it raining outside. Though…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume Sympathy Analysis
    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Hume Sympathy Analysis

    Hume argued, that although sometimes a good motive does not bring about pleasurable outcomes, we are able to appreciate it . This is made possible by our imagination and our belief of cause and effect, with which we are able to visualize thus appreciate the supposed good outcomes of such a good motive under normal circumstances, and thereby approve of the motive, even if the imagined good outcomes are not realized in the reality . A good motive with good resulting effects realized certainly strikes us more strongly, but when the good effects are not resulted, we tend to correct our sentiment because luck carries no moral value .…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume The Origin Of Morality Essay
    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Hume The Origin Of Morality Essay

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Descartes v Hume

    The concept of self identifies the essence of one’s very being. It implies continuous existence having no other exact equal, i.e. the one and only. Whether or not the specific characteristic(s) used to define self are objectively real, i.e. physical attributes, or purely subjective, i.e. imaginary traits, the concept makes distinct one entity from another. Rationalism is the theory that truth can be derived through use of reason alone. Empiricism, a rival theory, asserts that truth must be established by sensual experience: touch, taste, smell, et al. Rene Descartes, a philosopher and rationalist concluded that one self was merely a continuous awareness of one’s own existence; one’s substance was one’s ability to think. On the other hand, David Hume, an empiricist refuted Descartes conclusion and claimed that the concept of self was nonsense, the idea could not be linked to any sensual experience. Ultimately, Hume concluded that there was no such thing as self, i.e. self does not actually exist and that the concept was an illusion. Overall, Descartes theory of self is more reasonable than Hume’s.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's Inception Essay
    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Hume's Inception Essay

    While many rationalists such as René Descartes support the notion that the concept of Inception is not possible, empiricists such as David Hume may think differently. Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher known for his system of radical and philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism. In one of his works, Hume stated that one cannot create completely new ideas without either prior knowledge of those ideas, or experiencing those ideas. Put differently, he believed that the ideas of an individual are derived or inspired by other ideas that the individual has observed, because there is no such thing as an “original idea.” Taking Hume’s theory into account, in the movie Inception, the protagonist Dom Cobb teaches his new architect, Ariadne, how dreaming works. In their shared dream, Ariadne comes across Dom’s wife, Mal. While this…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics