Cynicism
Organizational Cynicism
Q-1) Why organizational cynicism prevails in most of the organization?
Cynicism Is On the Rise
Research over indicates that cynicism is on the rise which affects society as well as business. As one research depicts that Cynicism not only affects society at large, but also is widespread among organizations in the United States (Dean, Brandes, & Dharwadkar, 1998; Kanter & Mirvis, 1989), Europe, and Asia (Kouzes & Posner, 1993).
Research reports that cynicism in organisation hurts the competitiveness and ability to accommodate today 's needed organizational change. Paul J. Rosen (Hendrick, 1993, p. E1:2), President of the American Institute of Stress, indicates that recent, dizzying changes in technology and the economy are causing unprecedented burnout, cynicism, sickness and absenteeism.
About Cynicism
Cynicism is an attitude characterized by hopelessness, frustration and disillusionment. It is also related to contempt, disgust, and distrust (Andersson, 1996; Andersson & Bateman, 1997). The central belief associated with cynicism is that principles of honesty, fairness, and sincerity are sacrificed to further the individual 's self-interest. This underlying self-centered purpose is believed to lead to actions based on hidden agendas and deception (Abraham, 2000). This strong negative attitude permeates America’s corporations and is currently blamed for a multitude of unfavourable organizational outcomes. Thus, cynicism is recognized as a growing problem in the workplace that calls for immediate and detailed attention. Cynicism is described as a mind-set characterized by hopelessness, disappointment, and disillusionment, and is also associated with scorn, disgust, and suspicion (Andersson, 1996). This strong negative attitude has infiltrated America’s corporations, and is believed to be responsible for a host of unfavourable organizational consequences. Thus, cynicism is acknowledged as a increasing problem in the workplace that
Q-1) Why organizational cynicism prevails in most of the organization?
Cynicism Is On the Rise
Research over indicates that cynicism is on the rise which affects society as well as business. As one research depicts that Cynicism not only affects society at large, but also is widespread among organizations in the United States (Dean, Brandes, & Dharwadkar, 1998; Kanter & Mirvis, 1989), Europe, and Asia (Kouzes & Posner, 1993).
Research reports that cynicism in organisation hurts the competitiveness and ability to accommodate today 's needed organizational change. Paul J. Rosen (Hendrick, 1993, p. E1:2), President of the American Institute of Stress, indicates that recent, dizzying changes in technology and the economy are causing unprecedented burnout, cynicism, sickness and absenteeism.
About Cynicism
Cynicism is an attitude characterized by hopelessness, frustration and disillusionment. It is also related to contempt, disgust, and distrust (Andersson, 1996; Andersson & Bateman, 1997). The central belief associated with cynicism is that principles of honesty, fairness, and sincerity are sacrificed to further the individual 's self-interest. This underlying self-centered purpose is believed to lead to actions based on hidden agendas and deception (Abraham, 2000). This strong negative attitude permeates America’s corporations and is currently blamed for a multitude of unfavourable organizational outcomes. Thus, cynicism is recognized as a growing problem in the workplace that calls for immediate and detailed attention. Cynicism is described as a mind-set characterized by hopelessness, disappointment, and disillusionment, and is also associated with scorn, disgust, and suspicion (Andersson, 1996). This strong negative attitude has infiltrated America’s corporations, and is believed to be responsible for a host of unfavourable organizational consequences. Thus, cynicism is acknowledged as a increasing problem in the workplace that
References: 1. Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism bases and consequences. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 269-292. 2. Abraham, R. (2000a). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269-292. 3 4. Anderrson, L., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the work place: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 18, 449-470. 5. Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418. 6. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 18(5), 449-469. 7. Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(5), 449-469. 8. Bateman, T. S., Sakano, T., & Fujita, M. (1992). Roger, me, and my attitude: Film propaganda and cynicism toward corporate leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 768-771. 9. Dean, J. W., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341-352. 10. Feldman, D. C. (2000). The Dilbert syndrome: How employee cynicism about ineffective management is changing the nature of careers in organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(8), 1286-1300. 11. Goldner, F. H., Ritti, R. R., & Ference, T. P. (1977). The production of cynical knowledge in organizations. American Sociological Review, 42(4), 539-551. 12. Guastello, S. J., Rieke, M. L., Guastello, D. D., & Billings, S. W. (1992). A study of cynicism, personality, and work values. The Journal of Psychology, 126(1), 37-48. 13. James l. (2005)antecedents and consequences of cynicism in organizations: an examination of the potential positive and negative effects on school systems, The Florida state university college of business, Ph.d dissertation 14 15. Kanter, D. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (1989). The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusionment. San Francisco: JosseyBass. 16 17. Kouzes and Posner (2004).A prescription for leading in cynical times. Ivey Business Jounal, (2-7) 18 19. Mirvis, P., and Kanter, D. L. (1989). Combating cynicism in the workplace. National Productivity Review, 8(4), 377-394. 20. Mirvis, P., and Kanter, D. L. (1991). Beyond demography: A psychographic profile of the workforce. Human Resource Management, 30(1), 45-68. 21. O 'Brien, A. T., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Humphrey, L., O 'Sullivan, L., & Postmes, T. (2004). Cynicism and disengagement among devalued employee groups: The need to ASPIRe. Career Development International, 9(1), 28-44. 22. Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11(1), 48-59. 23. Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive, 11(1), 48-59. 24. Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997). Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive,11(1),(52-56) 25 26. Stanley, D. J., Meyer, J. P., & Topolnytsky, L. (2005). Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business & Psychology, 19(4), 429-459. 27. Turner, J. H., & Valentine, S. R. (2001). Cynicism as a fundamental dimension of moral decision-making: A scale development. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 123-136. 28. Urbany, J. E. (2005). Inspiration and cynicism in values statements. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 169-182. 29. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (1994). Organizational cynicism: An initial study. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings. 30. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group &Organization Management, 25(2), 132-153.