Preview

Curriculum Access for Students with Low-Incidence Disabilities: the Promise of Universal Design for Learning

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
53253 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Curriculum Access for Students with Low-Incidence Disabilities: the Promise of Universal Design for Learning
NCAC

Curriculum Access for Students with Low-Incidence Disabilities: The Promise of Universal Design for Learning

This report was written with support from the National Center on
Accessing the General Curriculum (NCAC), a cooperative agreement between CAST and the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP), Cooperative Agreement No. H324H990004.
The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, and no official endorsement by the Department should be inferred.

-------------------------------------------------
Curriculum Access for Students with Low-Incidence Disabilities: The Promise of Universal Design for Learning

Written by Richard M. Jackson, Director of Practice and CAST’s Liaison to Boston College for the National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum

-------------------------------------------------
Edited by Valerie Hendricks
-------------------------------------------------

This report addresses the following questions:

* What is Universal Design for Learning (UDL)?

* What are low-incidence disabilities?

* Why are schools and communities particularly challenged in serving students with low-incidence disabilities?

* What are the needs of students with low-incidence disabilities?

* What curricula and instructional practices are currently used with students with low-incidence disabilities?

* What planning models are in use for students with low-incidence disabilities?

* How can IEPs ensure greater access to the general curriculum for students with low-incidence disabilities?

* What approaches exist for enabling students with low-incidence disabilities to participate in state- and district-level assessment systems?

* How can the UDL framework increase access to the general curriculum for students with low-incidence disabilities?



References: Abel, G. L. (1959). The education of blind children. In Cruickshank, W. M. & Johnson, G. O. (Eds.). Education of exceptional children and youth. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Allen, K. E. & Schwartz, I. S. (1996). The exceptional child: Inclusion in early childhood education. Albany, NY: Delmar. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual. (4th Ed.). Washington, D.C. Andrews, J. F., Ferguson, C., Roberts, S., & Hodges, P. (1997). What’s up, Billy Jo? Deaf children and bilingual-bicultural instruction in East-Central Texas. American Annals of the Deaf, 142(1), 16-25. Barraga, N. (1964). Increased visual behavior in low vision children. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind. Baumgart, D. & Brown, L., et al. (1982). Principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 7, 17-27. Benz, M., Lindstrom, L., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives Berard, G. (1993). Hearing equals behavior. New Canaan, CT: Keats. Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291-314. Blackorby, J. & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal post-school outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 399-414. Blasch, B., Wiener, W., & Welsh, R. (Eds.). (1997). Foundations of orientation and mobility (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: AFB Press. Bowe, F. G. (2000). Universal design in education: Teaching non-traditional students. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey. Browder, D. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford. Browder, D., Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., & Algozzine, R. (2004). The alignment of alternate assessment content with academic and functional curricula. Journal of Special Education. 37(4), 211-225. Bryant, B. & Seay, P. C. (1998). The Technology-Related Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities Act: Relevance to individuals with learning disabilities and their advocates. Journal of Learning Disabilites, 31(1), 4-15. Bulgren, J. A., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1997). Use of a recall enhancement routine and strategies in inclusive secondary classes. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12(4). 198-208. Carr, E. G., Pridal, C., & Dorse, P. A. (1984). Speech versus sign comprehension in autistic children: Analysis and prediction Cawley, J. F. & Vitello, S. J. (1972). Model for arithmetical programming for handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 39(2), 101-110. Chen, D. (Ed.). (1999). Essential elements in early intervention: Visual impairment and multiple disabilities. New York, NY: AFB Press. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. Ll (1987). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Corn, A. L., Hatlen, P., Huebner, K. M., Ryan, F., & Siller, M. A. (1995). The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities. New York, NY: AFB Press. Corn, A. L. & Huebner, K. M. (1998). Report to the nation: The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind. Cuban, L. (1995). The hidden variable: How organizations influence teacher responses to secondary science curriculum reform. Theory Into Practice, 34(1), 4-11. Culatta, R. A. & Tompkins, J. R. (1999). Fundamentals of special education: What every teacher needs to know. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. Danielson, L. (1999). Universal design: Ensuring access to the general education curriculum. Research Connections, 5, 2-3. Dempsey, I. & Foreman, P. (2001). A review of educational approaches for individuals with autism. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, Special Issue 48(1), 103-116. Dolan, R. P. & Hall, T. E. (2001). Universal Design for Learning: Implications for large-scale assessment. IDA Perspectives, 27(4), 22-25. Dolan, R. P. & Rose, D. H. (2000). Accurate assessment through Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(4). Drasgow, E., Yell, M. L., & Robinson, T. R. (2001). Developing legally correct and educationally appropriate IEPs. Remedial and Special Education, 22(6), 359-374. Drew, C. J., Logan, D. R., & Hardman, M. L. (1992). Mental retardation: A life cycle approach. (5th Ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan. Dunlap, G. & Robbins, F. R., et al. (1994). Parents’ reports of their children’s challenging behaviors: Results of a state-wide survey. Mental Retardation, 32, 206-212. Dunn, J. M. (1997). Special physical education: Adapted, individualized, developmental. (7th Ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark. DuPaul, G. J. & Eckert, T. L. (1998). Academic interventions for students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review of the literature DuPaul, G. J. & Henningson, P. N. (1993). Peer tutoring effects on the classroom performance of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 22(1), 134-43. Easterbrooks, S.R. & Mordica, J.A. (2000). Teachers’ ratings of functional communication in students with cochlear implants. American Annals of the Deaf, 145(1), 54-59. Eisner, E. H. (2001). What does it mean to say a school is doing well? Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 367-373. Eisner, E. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York, NY: Macmillan College Publishing. Erickson, R. N., Thurlow, M. L., & Thor, K. (1995). State special education outcomes, 1994. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 404 799). Erickson, R. N., Thurlow, M. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1996). Neglected numerators, drifting denominators, and fractured fractions (Synthesis Report 23). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Falvey, M., Givner, C. C., & Kimm, C. (1996). What do I do on Monday morning? In Stainback, W Ferrell, K. A. (1985). Reach out and teach. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind. Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2001). Access to the core curriculum: Critical ingredients for student success. Remedial and Special Education, 22(3), 148-157. Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Sax, C. (1999). Inclusive elementary schools: Recipes for individualizing success. Colorado Springs, CO: PEAK Parent Center. Ford, A. & Davern, L., et al. (2001). Learners with significant disabilities: Curricular relevance in an era of standards-based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 214-223.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Case Study-Tracey

    • 1576 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Heward, W. L. (2013). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education…

    • 1576 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schwichtenberg, A., & Poehlmann, J. (2007). Applied behaviour analysis: does intervention intensity relate to family stressors and maternal well‐being?. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(8), 598-605.…

    • 2807 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Rothstein L Johnson S F 2010 Special Education LawRothstein, L., & Johnson, S. F. (2010). Special Education Law (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The implementation of new and different strategies is important as educators strive to meet the academic needs of students with disabilities. Students with disabilities are to be provided with the same opportunities to learn and grow academically as other students (Essex, 2012).…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the beginning of time until the end of time, there will always be students who require special education services. Throughout the 20th century, there have been many laws written to try and protect and help students with disabilities. Two in particular are the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA 1990). Special education classes were available in the 1950’s, but the outcome for the students was not what parents expected. The students in these classes could not preform academically, and were considered unteachable. They…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A con that has raised much concern about the use of inclusion within the classroom is that teachers are not properly trained nor receive adequate support to teach a student with a disability. With teachers already struggling to provide appropriate education for students without disabilities due to rigorous standards and mounting pressure to perform, with such a large burden it becomes unrealistic for teachers to provide the attention needed and deserved for disabled students within a regular education classroom. With lack of training in specialized education areas, teachers are unable to properly serve disabled children and in turn these students are unable to receive an appropriate education accompanied by specialized attention and care needed in order to suitably benefit educationally.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federal law mandates that every child, including those with disabilities, receive an equal opportunity for education in the least restrictive environment (Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2004). Determining specific disabilities among the student body will require the use of research based strategies to identify specific disorders and to develop strategies which may be employed to promote student success while acknowledging the presence of a federally identified disability.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Willowbrook

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bibliography: 1. Batshaw, M. L. (2013). Children with disabilities (7th ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Pub..…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virginia’s Guidelines for Educating Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. (n.d.). Retrieved on November 26, 2013…

    • 2430 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Iep Development

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Studies state data on students with disabilities, the consequences of assessment options, and possible instruction and assessment changes for these students. More specifically, the project...…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The level of difficulty can be overwhelming for students with disabilities. Not to mention those trying to graduate from high school. “A serious concern for parents of students with disabilities was the difficulty that their children would almost surely have in qualifying for a diploma that required them to pass tests that spoke only to specific skills at levels beyond their reach. A committee of parents and educators worked with the Department of Education and Early Development to recommend accommodations for students with disabilities. Sadly, the accommodations were to be available to only 2% of the special education population” (McDermott & McDermott,…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inclusion Paper

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In today’s society individuals are expected to graduate college, enter into a profession and use their skills to take advantage of opportunities in the workplace. The development of skills can be gained through the instruction of another individual. Before becoming a member of the workforce, individuals must receive educational opportunities in the classroom. One group of students who require systematic instruction are those with disabilities. These individuals must also have an opportunity to graduate college and become productive members of the workforce. This can be achieved through an inclusive model, which can meet their needs through the act of specialized instruction.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Kauffman, J. M., & Landrum, T. J. (2009). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (9th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    One course of action is to try to limit or even completely get rid of the segregation between students with disabilities and those without. Currently, there are still numerous public schools around the nation that have not developed a method towards transitioning to non-segregated classroom styles for individuals with disabilities. This exclusion between students with disabilities and those without is creating a barrier that is hurting their educational development and progress towards being able to take care of themselves and interact with others. However, there are always costs and benefits that come along with proposed policy solutions. One cost for limiting the segregation amongst students is there would need to be programs put in place…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * To examine what kind of facilities are available in schools for physically disabled, deaf, blind and students with low IQ or slow learners to ensure inclusive learning.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays