Cross-National Transfer of Employment Practices in Multinationals
cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals
Abstract
This paper argues for the systematic incorporation of power and interests into analysis of the cross-border transfer of practices within multinational companies (MNCs). Using a broadly Lukesian perspective on power it is argued that the transfer of practices involves different kinds of power capabilities through which MNC actors influence their institutional environment both at the ‘macro-level’ of host institutions and the ‘micro-level’ of the MNC itself. The incorporation of an explicit account of the way power interacts with institutions at different levels, it is suggested, underpins a more convincing account of transfer than is provided by the dominant neoinstitutionalist perspective in international business, and leads to a heuristic model capable of generating proposed patterns of transfer outcomes that may be tested empirically in future research.
Keywords multinationals; comparative & cross-cultural HRM; conflict; international HRM; strategic and international management; organisational theory.
Introduction
Much has been written about the cross-national transfer of management practices in multinational companies (MNCs). A recent conceptual development is the ‘neoinstitutionalist’ contribution of Kostova and colleagues (Kostova, 1999; Kostova and Roth, 2002; Kostova et al., 2008). In the international business literature, this approach shows signs of establishing a new intellectual hegemony.1 Given this salience, critical engagement is essential.
The neoinstitutionalist approach to practice transfer in MNCs has provided fundamental insights. It argues that MNCs – or to be more precise, their subsidiaries – operate under conditions of ‘institutional duality’, facing both the institutional terrain of the international firm itself and that of the host environment in which they operate. These institutional spheres exert rival isomorphic pressures which come to the fore
Abstract
This paper argues for the systematic incorporation of power and interests into analysis of the cross-border transfer of practices within multinational companies (MNCs). Using a broadly Lukesian perspective on power it is argued that the transfer of practices involves different kinds of power capabilities through which MNC actors influence their institutional environment both at the ‘macro-level’ of host institutions and the ‘micro-level’ of the MNC itself. The incorporation of an explicit account of the way power interacts with institutions at different levels, it is suggested, underpins a more convincing account of transfer than is provided by the dominant neoinstitutionalist perspective in international business, and leads to a heuristic model capable of generating proposed patterns of transfer outcomes that may be tested empirically in future research.
Keywords multinationals; comparative & cross-cultural HRM; conflict; international HRM; strategic and international management; organisational theory.
Introduction
Much has been written about the cross-national transfer of management practices in multinational companies (MNCs). A recent conceptual development is the ‘neoinstitutionalist’ contribution of Kostova and colleagues (Kostova, 1999; Kostova and Roth, 2002; Kostova et al., 2008). In the international business literature, this approach shows signs of establishing a new intellectual hegemony.1 Given this salience, critical engagement is essential.
The neoinstitutionalist approach to practice transfer in MNCs has provided fundamental insights. It argues that MNCs – or to be more precise, their subsidiaries – operate under conditions of ‘institutional duality’, facing both the institutional terrain of the international firm itself and that of the host environment in which they operate. These institutional spheres exert rival isomorphic pressures which come to the fore
References: Almond P (2011) The sub-national embeddedness of multinational corporations. Human Relations 64(4): 531-51. Almond P and Ferner A (eds) (2006) American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations Across National Borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Almond P, Muller-Camen M, Collings D and Quintanilla J (2006) Pay and Performance. In: Almond P and Ferner A (eds), American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations Across National Borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119-45. Andersson U and Forsgren M (1996) Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review 5(5): 487-508. Andersson U and Holm U (eds) (2010) Managing the Contemporary Multinational. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Becker-Ritterspach F (2009) Hybridization of MNE Subsidiaries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Bélanger J, Berggren C, Björkman T and Köhler C (1999) Being Local Worldwide: ABB and the Challenge of Global Management. Ithaca: ILR Press. Bouquet C and Birkinshaw J (2008) Managing power in the multinational corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management 34(3): 477-508. Boxall P and Purcell J (2011) Strategy and Human Resource Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Campbell J L (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Clemens ES and Cook JM (1999) Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441-66. Colling T, Gunnigle P, Quintanilla J and Tempel A (2006) Collective representation and participation. In: Almond P and Ferner A (eds) American Multinationals in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 95–118. Crouch C (2005) Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crouch C, Schröder M and Voelzkow H (2009) Regional and sectoral varieties of capitalism. Economy and Society 38(4): 654-78. Delmestri G (2009) Institutional Streams, Logics, and Fields. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 27: 115-44. DeVos T (1981) US Multinationals and Worker Participation in Management. The American experience in the European Community. London: Aldwych. Djelic M-L and Quack S (eds) (2003) Globalization and institutions - Redefining the rules of the economic game. London: Edward Elgar. Dörrenbächer C and Gammelgaard J (2010) Multinational corporations, inter-organizational networks and subsidiary charter removals. Journal of World Business 45(2): 206-16. Dörrenbächer C and Gammelgaard J (2011) Subsidiary power in multinational corporations: the subtle role of micro-political bargaining power. Critical Perspectives on International Business 7(1): 30-47. Dörrenbächer C and Geppert M (2009a) A Micro-political Perspective on Subsidiary Initiative-taking: Evidence from German-owned Subsidiaries in France. European Management Journal 27(2): 100-12. Dörrenbächer C and Geppert M (2009b) Micro-political Games in the Multinational Corporation: The Case of Mandate Change. Management Revue 20(4): 373-391. Dörrenbächer C and Geppert M (eds) (2011) Politics and Power in the International Corporation: The role of institutions, interests and identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edwards P (1986) Conflict at Work: A Materialist Analysis of Workplace Relations. Oxford: Blackwell. Edwards T and Ferner A (2004) Multinationals, reverse diffusion and national business systems. Management International Review Special issue (1/2004): 49-79. Edwards P and Bélanger J (2009) The MNC as a contested terrain. In: Collinson S and Morgan G (eds) The Multinational Firm. Oxford: Wiley, 193-216. Edwards T, Colling T and Ferner A (2007) Conceptual approaches to the transfer of employment practices in multinational companies: an integrated approach. Human Resource Management Journal 17(3): 201-17. Edwards T and Ferner A (2004) Multinationals, reverse diffusion and national business systems. Management International Review Special issue (1/2004): 49-79. Egelhoff W (2010) Evaluating the role of parent HQ in a contemporary MNC. In: Andersson U and Holm U (eds) Managing the Contemporary Multinational. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 106-22. Erkama N and Vaara E (2010) Struggles over Legitimacy in Global Organizational Restructuring: A Rhetorical Perspective on Legitimation Strategies and Dynamics in a Shutdown Case. Organisation Studies 31(7): 813-39. Evans P and Lorange P (1989) The Two Logics Behind Human Resource Management. In: Evans P, Doz Y and Laurent A (eds) Human Resource Management in International Firms. Change, Globalization, Innovation. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 144-61. Ferner A (2000) The underpinnings of "bureaucratic" control systems: HRM in European multinationals. Journal of Management Studies 37(4): 521-40. Ferner A, Almond P and Colling T (2005) Institutional theory and the cross-national transfer of employment policy: the case of 'workforce diversity ' in US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies 36(3): 304-21. Ferner A and Edwards P (1995) Power and the diffusion of organizational change within multinational enterprises. European Journal of Industrial Relations 1(2): 229-57. Ferner A and Tempel A (2006) Multinationals and National Business Systems: A Power and Institutions Perspective. In: Ferner A and Almond P (eds) American Multinationals in Europe. Managing Employment Relations Across National Borders, Oxford: OUP, 10-33. Ferner A and Varul M Zick (2000) “Vanguard” subsidiaries and the diffusion of new practices: a case study of German multinationals. British Journal of Industrial Relations 38(1): 115-40. Gramsci A (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers. Greenwood R and Hinings CR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change. Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review 21(4): 1022-1054. Hall P and Soskice D (2001) ‘An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’. In: Hall P and Soskice D Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: OUP, 1-70. Hardy C (1996) Understanding Power: Bringing about Strategic Change. British Journal of Management 7(S1), 3-16. Knight J (1992) Institutions and Social Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kostova T (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review 24(2): 308-24. Kostova T and Roth K (2002) Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal 35(1): 215-33. Kostova T, Roth K and Dacin M (2008) Institutional Theory in the Study of MNCs: A Critique and New Directions. Academy of Management Review 33(4): 994-1007. Kostova T and Zaheer S (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review 24(1): 64-81. Kotthoff H (1994) Betriebsräte und Bürgerstatus: Wandel und Kontinuität betrieblicher Mitbestimmung. Munich: Hampp. Kristensen P H and Zeitlin J (2005) Local Players in Global Games: The strategic constitution of a multinational corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lado A and Wilson M (1994) Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review 19(4): 699-728. Lam A (1997) Embedded firms, embedded knowledge. Organization Studies 18(6): 973-96. Lane C and Wood G (2009) Capitalist diversity and diversity within capitalism. Economy and Society 38(4): 531-51. Lawrence T (2008) Power, Institutions and Organizations. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K and Suddaby R (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Los Angeles: Sage, 170-97. Lawrence T and Suddaby R (2006) Institutions and Institutional work. In: Clegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence T and Nord W (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd Edition. London: Sage: 215-54. Levy D L (2008) Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. Academy of Management Review 33(4): 943–63. Levy D L and Egan D (2003) A Neo-Gramscian Approach to Corporate Political Strategy: Conflict and Accommodation in the Climate Change Negotiations. Journal of Management Studies 40(4): 803-29. Liberman L and Torbiorn I (2000) 'Variances in staff-related management practices at eight European country subsidiaries of a global firm ', International Journal of Human Resource Management 11(1): 37-59. Lindholm N, Tahvanainen M and Björkman I (1999) Performance appraisal of host country employees: Western MNCs in China. In: Brewster C and Harris H (eds) International HRM: Contemporary issues in Europe. London: Routledge, 143-59. Lounsbury M (2003) The Problem of Order Revisited: Towards a Critical Institutional Perspective. In: Westwood R and Clegg S Debating Organization: Point-Counterpoint in Organization Studies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 210-19. Lukes S (1975) Power: A Radical View. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. Lukes S (2005) Power: A Radical View. (2nd edition.) London: Palgrave-Macmillan. Morgan G (2009) Globalization, Multinationals and Institutional Diversity. Economy and Society 38(4): 580-605. Morgan G and Kristensen PH (2006) The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations 59(11): 1467-90. Morgan G, Kelly B, Sharpe D and Whitley R (2003) Global Managers and Japanese Multinationals’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 14(3): 309-407. Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16(1): 145-79. Phillips N, Tracey P and Karra N (2009) Rethinking Institutional Distance: Strengthening the Tie Between New Institutional Theory and International Management. Strategic Organization 7(3): 339-48. Pudelko M and Harzing Anne-Wil K (2007) Country-of-Origin, Localization or Dominance Effects? An empirical investigation of HRM practices in foreign subsidiaries. Human Resource Management 46(4): 535-59. Rosenzweig P and Nohria N (1994) Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies 25(2): 229-51. Saka A (2002) Institutional Limits to the Internalization of Work Systems: A Comparative Study of Three Japanese MNCs in the UK. European Journal of Industrial Relations 8(3): 251-75. Schwartz H (2009) Subprime Nation: American Power, Global Capital and the Housing Bubble. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Scott W Richard (2008) Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage. Sell SK (2000) Big Business and the New Trade Agreements. In: Stubbs R and Underhill G (eds) Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press: 174-83. Seo M G and Creed WED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 222-47. Singe I and Croucher R (2005) US Multi-Nationals and the German Industrial Relations System. Management Revue 16(1): 123-37. Sklair Leslie (2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell. Smith C and Meiskins P (1995) System, Society and Dominance Effects in Cross-National Organisational Analysis. 'Work, Employment and Society 9(2): 241-67. Stinchcombe AL (1997) On the virtues of the old institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 1-18. Streeck W and Thelen K (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Suddaby R and Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 35-67. Szulanski G (1996) Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter Special Issue): 27-43. Szulanski G and Jensen R (2006) Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 27(10): 937-57. Tempel A and Walgenbach P (2007) Global Standardization of Organizational Forms and Management Practices? What New Institutionalism and the Business Systems Approach Can Learn From Each Other. Journal of Management Studies 44(1): 1-24. Tempel A, Edwards T, Ferner A, Muller-Camen M and Wächter H (2006) Subsidiary Responses to Institutional Duality: Collective Representation in US Multinationals in Britain and Germany. Human Relations 59(11): 1543-70. Thelen K (2009) Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations 47(3): 471-98. | |Power of resources |Power of processes |Power of meaning | |Macro-institutional - global |Dominance effects (Smith and Meiksins, 1995) |Influence over systemic decision-making rules (e.g | | |2003; Sell, 2000) |provide a legitimizing frame (Campbell, 2004) for HQ actions | |Macro-institutional - national |Lobbying capabilities (e.g