Preview

Cross 9e TBB Ch03

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cross 9e TBB Ch03
Chapter 3

Alternative and Online
Dispute Resolution

N.B.: TYPE indicates that a question is new, modified, or unchanged, as follows.

N A question new to this edition of the Test Bank.
+ A question modified from the previous edition of the Test Bank.
= A question included in the previous edition of the Test Bank.

TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS

1. Few civil lawsuits are settled before trial.

answer: F PAGES: Introduction TYPE: + BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Risk Analysis

2. Litigation is the process of resolving a dispute through the court system.

answer: T PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: N BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Risk Analysis

3. In mediation, the mediator proposes a solution and makes a decision resolving the dispute.

answer: F PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Critical Thinking

4. A mini-trial is a private proceeding in which each party’s attorney ar­gues the party’s case before the other party.

answer: t PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: = BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Critical Thinking

5. Facilitation is adversarial in nature.

ANSWER: F PAGES: Section 1 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Critical Thinking

6. In arbitration, the third party’s decision may be legally binding or nonbinding.

answer: T PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: + BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal

7. A submission occurs when one of the parties to arbitration agrees to give up his or her claims.

answer: f PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: = BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal

8. Most states do not enforce agreements to arbitrate disputes between pri­vate parties.

answer: F PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: = BUSPROG: Analytic AICPA: BB-Legal

9. A compulsory arbitration in a consumer contract may be unconscionable.

ANSWER: T PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: = BUSPROG: Reflective AICPA: BB-Critical Thinking

10. An arbitrator’s award will not be set aside simply because the arbitrator let only one side argue its case.

answer: F PAGES: Section 2 TYPE: = BUSPROG:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The arbitrator decides the rules, weighs the facts and arguments of both parties, and then decides the dispute. Arbitration may be voluntary or mandatory. ( naca.net)…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Black8e Ch19 Tb

    • 4581 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Learning Objective 1: LO 19.1 Review the anatomy of the skin and mucus membranes with regards to microbial defenses.…

    • 4581 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB U05

    • 464 Words
    • 3 Pages

    the ethical and legal implications of breaching company policy on the use of electronic data…

    • 464 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Black8e Ch21 Tb

    • 4239 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Learning Objective 1: LO 21.1 Review the anatomy of the upper and lower respiratory tract as it pertains to microbial defenses.…

    • 4239 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch14

    • 2169 Words
    • 12 Pages

    More than two hundred years ago, the Declaration of Independence recognized the importance of protecting creative works.…

    • 2169 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch24

    • 2356 Words
    • 12 Pages

    State consumer protection agencies are charged by Congress with the broadly stated goal of preventing unfair and deceptive trade practices.…

    • 2356 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch02

    • 2690 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Under the authority of a long arm statute, a court can exercise personal jurisdic­tion over certain out-of-state defendants.…

    • 2690 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration is a relatively fast way to arrive upon a decision when two parties are in a dispute. Arbitration has definite benefits such as being flexible and not as formal as a traditional courthouse. Usually, arbitration can be scheduled quicker and with less working parts than a trial. In rare instances, if all parties involved come to an agreement, arbitrators can sometimes create rulings that judges are not allowed to decide. In arbitration, both sides present all evidence to an arbitrator in efforts to prove each side’s case. The arbitrator reaches a final verdict and decides whom the winners and losers are. An arbitrator does the job that a traditional judge or jury would normally do in court if the matter escalated to that point (Hill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Black8e Ch18 Tb

    • 4595 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Chapter 18: Immunolgy II: Immunological Disorders and Tests Question Type: Multiple Choice 1) Hypersensitivity or allergy refers to the immune system responding _____. a) in an exaggerated way to a foreign substance b) too little too late c) inadequately to an antigen d) to its own tissues as if they were foreign Answer: a Difficulty: Easy Learning Objective 1: LO 18.1 Explain the meaning of the terms hypersensitivity and immunodeficiency. Section Reference 1: Section 18.1 Overview of Immunological Disorders 2) Immunodeficiency refers to the immune system responding _____.…

    • 4595 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Judgment Rule

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    [2] [pic]Initially, St. Paul contends that this action is barred by the “one final judgment” rule. In support of its argument, St. Paul cites cases which set forth the doctrine of res judicata. St. Paul reasons that the judgment T & R obtained against Capitol after arbitration precludes any subsequent proceedings against St. Paul because a second action between the same parties on the same claim is impermissible (citing Clark v. Lesher (1956) 46 Cal.2d 874, 880, 299 P.2d 865).…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision made by the arbitrator is legally enforceable (binding). Private arbitrators may be asked to arbitrate on matters that were not able to be resolved through negotiation or mediation. Mediation is a joint problem-solving process in which the parties in conflict sit down and discuss the issue involved, develop options, consider alternatives and reach an agreement through negotiation. The mediator does not interfere, but keeps the lines of communication open. Although a decision reached during the mediation process is not binding on the parties, parties tend to be more committed to a decision reached in this way and are more likely to uphold…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the event that the dispute is not settled during mediation, an arbitration clause will follow. If the dispute cannot be settled within 48 hours after the mediator has been appointed, the dispute will be referred and resolved through arbitration. This clause will be enforced for members who denied mediation and members who were unable to reach an agreement during mediation. The mediator will not be allowed to serve as the arbitrator in arbitration, due to possible bias being present because of intimate information received during mediation. The role of arbitrator will be appointed by all team members, excluding persons with previous or current involvement in the dispute. The arbitrator’s decision shall be final and binding. In the event that a member fails to proceed with arbitration, challenges the…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The adversary system of trial refers to the system used here in Australia, where two opposing parties prepare and present their case, in accordance with the strict rules of evidence and procedure, before an independent or impartial adjudicator. The adversary system aims to achieve fair and unbiased hearings, effective access to mechanisms for dispute resolution and timely resolution of disputes. Some aspects of the adversary system of trial work very well but there are certain aspects that can do with reform to further improve the adversary system.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    for the final outcome, but consensus is not necessary to fair process (IIRP, n.d.; Macready,…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays