In a democracy the Government is voted in by the people, and it could be argued this process makes it legitimate. But not all states in the world are democratic, so can they be seen to be a legitimate governing body, with the authority to rule the people of that territory?
This essay will examine the legitimacy of the states power and if they are justified to be the governing authority in a given territory.
The United Kingdom is a democratic society; the people are given the opportunity to vote, for the political party they consider will be the best to govern. However not all persons use their vote, and those who do, not all take careful consideration over the parties portfolio, but follow a habit of generations.
In the 2010 general election only 65.1% of the 46 million registered voters used their vote (UK Political info). That means around 16 million people chose not to, does this mean that they were content with whatever political party was elected and willingly except them as the legitimate governing authority.
These non voters may be the democratic minimalists as described by David Beetham, (Citizens and the state, 2009, track 2) who believe that democracy is the right to govern through elections, but the voting should be left to those who understand the party line. That would leave the persons who voted as the democratic maximalists, who believe that they should have their say and participate more than normal. Although this would suggest there is room for another category between the two, the section of the population who only get interested in politics when there is a general or local election and the rest of the time they are content with the elected party.
However would it make a difference to the legitimacy if maximalists were given extra power and given the opportunity to have their say, through citizen’s initiative, local referendums and Citizens Juries? Citizens juries, modelled on the structure of a criminal Jury, consists of 12 -16 ‘best fit’ demographic members of the public to examine an issue of public significance and deliver a verdict (People and participation.net) However is 12 – 16 people a good cross section of the society, especially when the UK is considering changing trial by jury in fraud cases, because jurors struggle dealing with the complex evidence involved. (BBC news online) So it would appear that Joseph Schrumpeter had a valid point when he stated that people in his view do not have the skill or capacity to do any more than to vote. (Citizens and the state, 2009, track 2).
This is supported by a personal pledge submitted by Kiltie Jackson a UK citizen which includes “ But most importantly, and over everything else, I swear that I will not take myself, or my country, too seriously because I am proud to be British and that is how we do it” (Blakely and Saward, 2009, p.363)
So can a democratic voting system give the legitimacy of an organisation when in the UK only two thirds of the voting population voted? Further analysis shows only a quarter of the eligible voters voted Conservative forcing a coalition with the Liberal Democrats and the new Government was formed by only 42% of eligible voters (BBC News Online). If you took the total population of the UK this makes 32% of the people. Is this enough to claim a monopoly as the legitimate governing authority, especially when split between two parties.
“Creating and maintaining political order is largely the job of the state, which we can define as a set of practices, a set of institutions and as a rather abstract idea”. (Blakely and Saward, 2009, p.360) In every state there are many laws, in the UK they range from sounding your car horn whilst stationary (NFHIB online) to murder, all prosecuted under the judicial system and giving a range of punishments from fines to life imprisonment. But can all laws be seen as a justifiable force, to prevent social chaos and keep social order or does this ‘big brother’ attitude actually create disorder by not giving adults their own responsibilities ?. A House of Lords committee believed so, and claimed that Labour 's decision to ban smoking in all pubs, clubs and workplaces on 1st July 2007 was not justified by the "relatively minor" risk posed by passive smoking (telegraph online).
The police forces are seen as the law enforcers and given the authority to use justifiable force during their duties. However what happens when they use force which is not justifiable is this reflected in the Government and should they be answerable when there is a breakdown. In April 2009 at the G20 summit in London 5,000 protestors rallying on climate change stated that they were falsely imprisoned by the police in contravention of article 5 of the Human Rights (Contact Law) The high court ruled that this use of force was unjustified.
So what happens in a state which is not democratic can this state be a legitimate governing body? There are many territories in the world at present where there has been a breakdown in social order; some where other states of the international community have got involved.
Libya and its leader Muammar Gadaffi who has been in power since September 1st 1969 is one such state. Gadaffi was not democratically elected but seized control in a military coup deposing King Idrs (biography.com). He was not invited in by the people, but his followers after the coup named him commander in chief of the armed forces and chairman of Libya’s new governing body. As far as Gadaffi was concerned he became the legitimate governing body for his state and began his rule by expelling most of the Italian and Jewish nationals, removing the US and British military bases and outlawing beverages and gambling. So is it fear why Gadaffi has ruled for 42 yrs with his policies expressed in his writings ‘The Green book’. Gadaffi’s legitimacy did not initially come into question internationally until he encroached on other Countries. His Government financed terrorist groups worldwide including in the United States and Northern Ireland. In 1988 the United Nations Security Council got involved with Libya’s alleged involvement in the destruction of a Pan American airliner over Lockerbie, and Gaddafi and Libya were isolated from the international community. However since 2003 by turning over the perpetrators and ceasing its weapons programme, Gadaffi improved his image and assisted his country’s return to the international arena.
However although claiming to be the legitimate Governing body in a non democratic election this Anarchy at some stage had to reach a climax, this peak was reached in 2011 with a rebel uprising fighting against Gadaffi forces, but should other states get involved?
If we agree that UK is a legitimate state, although as discussed earlier this could be in question, has the Government the right to supply weapons and training to these rebels and what legitimacy have these rebels to use force. If we look at Simon Bromley’s analogy of Privateers and Pirates (2009 p.418 -427) we appear to be going along a similar line, and the Libyan rebels of today could become the pirates of tomorrow.
The UK foreign secretary Mr Hague visited Libya and stated the reason as, “to show our support for the Libyan people and for the National Transitional Council, the legitimate representative of the Libyan people", he stopped short of calling it the legitimate government, which France and Italy did. (BBC News online)
So Hague is using the word legitimate to justify the UK’s use of force in another territory. Gaddafi has been governing the territory for 42yrs, and so is he using his logic, and believes he is justified to use force to quell the rebels and regain order. We may well be looking at two extremes but the UK, Gadaffi and the rebels are all stating that their use of force is justifiable.
In conclusion, the UK are claiming the governing legitimacy by being democratic involving more of the people through citizens initiative and Jury’s but as examined even a democracy does not show the true thoughts of the voting public. This compared with a president who is not voted in by the people but rules the territory as he considers fit.
The main thing any governing body needs to show its legitimacy is to logically justify why they are in that position which in itself can lead to many debates. So one should ask can any state fully claim to be the legitimate governing authority in a territory, especially when it comes to using force in another country.
1,508 Words References
BBC News online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6150514.stm (accessed 3rd June 2011)
BBC News online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/election2010/results/ (accessed 3rd June 2011)
BBC News Online http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13655288 (accessed 5th June 2011)
BBC News Online: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10401629 (accessed 3rd June 2011)
Biography.com: http://www.biography.com/articles/muammar-al-qaddafi-39014 (accessed 4th June 2011)
Blakely, G. and Saward, M (2009) ‘Political ordering’ in Taylor, S., Hinchcliffe, S., Clarke, J and Bromley, S. (eds) Exploring Social Lives, Milton Keynes, The Open University.
Bromley, S (2009) ‘Pirates and predators authority and power in international affairs’ in Taylor, S., Hinchcliffe, S., Clarke, J and Bromley, S. (eds) Exploring Social Lives, Milton Keynes, The Open University. ‘Citizens and the state’ (2009) Exploring Social Lives [Audio CD 3], Milton Keynes, The Open University.
Contact Law: http://solicitors.contactlaw.co.uk/human-rights/met-police-used-unjustifiable-force-against-g20-protestors-991447.html (accessed 30th May 2010)
Neighbours from hell in Britain: http://www.nfh.org.uk/spotlight/car_horn/index.php (accessed 30th May 2011)
Oxford Dictionaries: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/legitimate?region=us (accessed 30th May 2011)
People and Participation: http://www.peopleandparticipation.net/display/Methods/Citizens+Jury (accessed 3rd June 2011)
Telegraph online: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1520537/Pub-smoking-ban-is-not-justified-say-peers.html (accessed 30th May 2010)
True Knowledge: http://www.trueknowledge.com/q/population_of_uk_2010 (accessed 3rd June 2011)
UK Political Info: http://www.ukpolitical.info/Turnout45.htm (accessed 3rd June
References: BBC News online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6150514.stm (accessed 3rd June 2011) BBC News online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/election2010/results/ (accessed 3rd June 2011) BBC News Online http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13655288 (accessed 5th June 2011) BBC News Online: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10401629 (accessed 3rd June 2011) Biography.com: http://www.biography.com/articles/muammar-al-qaddafi-39014 (accessed 4th June 2011) Blakely, G Bromley, S (2009) ‘Pirates and predators authority and power in international affairs’ in Taylor, S., Hinchcliffe, S., Clarke, J and Bromley, S. (eds) Exploring Social Lives, Milton Keynes, The Open University. ‘Citizens and the state’ (2009) Exploring Social Lives [Audio CD 3], Milton Keynes, The Open University. Oxford Dictionaries: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/legitimate?region=us (accessed 30th May 2011) People and Participation: http://www.peopleandparticipation.net/display/Methods/Citizens+Jury (accessed 3rd June 2011) Telegraph online: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1520537/Pub-smoking-ban-is-not-justified-say-peers.html (accessed 30th May 2010) True Knowledge: http://www.trueknowledge.com/q/population_of_uk_2010 (accessed 3rd June 2011)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
25: Evaluate the main roles and functions performed by political parties within the UK political system.…
- 1601 Words
- 10 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are a lot of ways in which citizens can participate in politics in the UK without necessarily having to vote for example: joining a political party, boycotting, and even signing petitions and fund raising. However, there is an argument that there has been a participation crisis over the past years in the UK. A participation crisis is when less and less citizens take part in political activities; this can be shown in the decrease of voter turnout and the level of participation. On the other hand, there is an argument that there is in fact not a participation crisis because the turnout of voting is increasing and specific forms of participation are also on the rise. In this essay, I will be arguing whether or not the UK is suffering from a participation crisis and if we are suffering to what extent.…
- 1234 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The text focuses on who governs and, in answering this question, looks at how the government makes decisions on a variety of issues…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Between the years of 1945-1970 social class dominantly shaped the voting behaviour of individuals. Whilst there has been a decline in prominence of class voting: Labour remains the most popular working class party and Conservatives perform best among middle-class voters. Social classes are defined by economic and social status, i.e. working class typically consists of blue-collar workers, and in the past a strong link existed between voting behaviour and social class. This link existed due to entrenched ideals within social classes and lack of upward social mobility, meaning stable, long-term relationships would form to a particular party that best reflected the interests of an individual’s socio economic group, i.e AB social classes were seemingly intertwined with the fabric of the Conservative party. This party identification, or partisan, led to 64% of the vote in the mid 1960’s compromising of B support for Conservatives and C1/2 support for Labour. Yet since the 1970’s there has been both class and partisan dealignment. This can be accredited to changes in employment patterns, educational opportunities and rising standards of living. This means that the core vote of the two main parties is reduced and there are more floating voters, who are sans allegiance or attachment to any political party, less than 40% of voters say they have a strong attachment to any party compared with 90% in post-war Britain. To compliment this, albeit Labour was founded upon a commitment to a class, in 1997 New Labour made significant gains across the middle-class…
- 1348 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There are a many ways in which citizens can participate in politics in the UK without necessarily having to vote for example: joining a political party, boycotting, and even signing petitions and fund raising. All of these methods provide political involvement without a democratic vote being placed. Participation in marches has increased recently as more people see the effects of this form of involvement in politics. However, there is an argument that there has been a participation crisis over the past years in the UK. A participation crisis is when less and less citizens take part in political activities; this can be shown in the decrease of voter turnout and the level of participation. This is in some ways a crisis as it means that some people within the population will not be represented by a vote, and so may not be politically catered for. This would lead to some citizens being favoured in politics as they actually affect who is in power with their vote. On the other hand, there is an argument that there is in fact not a participation crisis because the turnout of voting is increasing and specific forms of participation are also on the rise.The main concern about democracy in the UK comes from evidence of rising political apathy. Some people have seen this as nothing more than a ‘participation crisis’ Political Apathy is the lack of caring or strong emotions linked to politics. Politically apathetic people are far less likely to take it upon themselves to vote as they won’t have strong political views for or against any party. Deteriorating rates of voter turnout and falling levels of party membership despite there being opportunities for participation show evidence. There are three main reasons to show why there is a participation crisis in the UK. The first reason is the public. Due to people’s increasing lack of community care, citizens fail to pull together and look out for each other, which decreases the interest and connection they have in politics.…
- 2196 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
However, even though voting system created an unequal two-party system, the Government did try to rectify this by putting forward a referendum to the public that asked whether they should change the voting system, the answer was no. Therefore the Government cannot be blamed for having a democratic deficit in this field as they tried to change but listened to their people, arguably…
- 484 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Although some individuals do not like to vote because they believe that their vote doesn't do anything that number has slowly decreased and more people are voting because they are demanding change for the…
- 664 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Due the nation's interest in materialism and individualism, we have gained a certain lack of interest in political matters and affairs – people find politics dull and many people think that it doesn't affect them, this results to certain inhabitants obtaining a 'laissez-faire' attitude toward the government. Nowadays citizens around the UK aren't aware of political dealings; this supports the idea that today's society has become far more materialistic when compared to the previous generations. Many people take the approach that the government can 'do what they want' as the majority of Brits spend their time worrying about getting the next best iPhone etc. The UK has become very divided in the past 20 years due to the generation gap between certain individuals in society. Today's generation of teenagers have become disinterested in the UK's current affairs, this may be down to the fact that they have not been socialised to consider the country's events, which in turn blames the next generation and their lack of interest in how Britain is governed, this has lead to the UK's population becoming far more self aware as opposed to considering others. On the contrary, the elderly people in today's society were raised with slightly different morals and views on how their country was governed. Previous generations deemed voting to be a privilege, something that they had earned – the majority of this generation wouldn't even dream of not voting...out of respect. This highlights how the change in generations has prompted the UK to dive into a participation crisis.…
- 924 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Voter Apathy is referenced as a term to describe the phenomena of steady decline in political participation over the past 30 years. Apathy can be defined as the lack of interest, enthusiasm, emotion or concern towards a specific topic. Statistically, “voter apathy” may be displayed at the polls, but public activism is still a major part of society. For example, the “Occupy” movement is in every city with large amounts of citizen protests choosing a less conventional method of political expression, rather than the electoral process. Like that of “Occupy,” today there are infinite options to support certain causes, instead of just joining one of the two major parties and vote Republican or Democrat. The amount of third parties and interest groups are at their historical highest. Electoral Absence would be a more politically correct term for what is “Voter Apathy.”…
- 1285 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Back in Australian history, many people would stop voting, to a point where they made it mandatory. The voting system was brought in 1924 and the turnouts are usually not under 90%. The year the government had to enforce this rule it rose to about 32%. This system is still disproving what people say, that the citizens were forced against their own will. But it is supported by 70% of the citizens. More than 23 countries have compulsory voting and like Australia, the benefits have outweighed the negatives.…
- 602 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Evidence of this is information included in Filip Palda’s “Vote. Or Else!” Fraser Forum states country with the lowest voter participation, such as the US and Switzerland has some of the highest satisfaction rates. this evidence helps explain why Americans should not be required to vote because in compulsory voting systems people do not care about what they put on their ballot, just that they don’t get punished for not voting at all. Therefore, fewer people are happy with the election's…
- 468 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
As well as a decreasing number of people voting in general elections there is a similarly decreasing number of people becoming members of political parties and this is another reason to agree that there is a participation crisis in the UK. In 2010, only 1% of the…
- 888 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
America is arguably the most influential nation in the world, but has one of the lowest voter turnouts. Less than 57% of the United States electorate does not vote to the hurdles that it takes to exercise a basic right. The reasons for voter apathy include not registering, inability to get to the polls and the type of election.…
- 318 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In today’s society, now that we all have the opportunity to vote, it should be respected when someone does not want to participate in casting a ballot. There are numerous reason as to why someone would not want to vote. Americans conscious of how the system works, are already aware of the flood of "dark money" that routinely distorts the electoral process. Many, know that our democracy is a farce. We live in a plutocracy where money buys elections and wealth rules supreme. Political intellectuals have varied theories about why some potential voters do not trouble themselves to vote, especially in off-year or nonpresidential elections. A scholarly article published in the American Journal of Political Science, proposed that midterm elections lack a “wow” factor and that generally only political adherents bother to vote (Fulwood 2014) . Regardless of President Obamas lack of American support, his acumen as a Presidential candidate encouraged remarkable turnout among unlikely voters, especially those who are young, minority, and poor. That was because voting is an expression of hope, a belief that a citizen’s input into the system will yield social…
- 976 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After doing some research it shows that a huge percentage of people are not voting because political parties fail to interest and connect with the voters and this leads to the voting population being less interest in the campaign, while when others think about registering and then when they end up deciding if they want to vote or not, by the time they realize the election is already here (McDonald, 2013). This happened to a lot of my friends, they weren’t sure about voting in 2016 presidential election then they looked into it and decided by this time it was too late. This bad trend of voter turnout can be traced way back to the reforms of the Progressive era (McDonald, 2013). Turnout in post-Progressive era America continues to stay low, not at any time reaching the levels before the Progressive era reforms (McDonald, 2013). This would be accustomed since it is very little in the political history of there years that would indicate a return to a collectively oriented system of voter participation (McDonald, 2013). Since 1912, only about 50 to 65% of Americans have voted in presidential elections and as few as 10 to 20 percent in primaries and minor local elections, although the exact number depends on how turnout is measured (McDonald, 2013). Voter turnout started declining at the end of the…
- 1694 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays