Preview

The Separation of Powers in the Hong Kong Legal System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2782 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Separation of Powers in the Hong Kong Legal System
"There should be mutual understanding and support amongst the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary institutions."Xi Jinping Vice-President of the People's Republic of China during his visit to the Hong Kong SAR on July 7th, 2008 made the above statement that hit a raw nerve in the public. In response to concerns in the fundamentals of Hong Kong's legal system, Hong Kong Bar Association issued a statement to clarify that the judiciary independence is "firmly guaranteed" by the Basic Law, which is to "remain separate and independent from the Executive and the Legislature" and shall not be "regarded as a part of the governance team" (Hong Kong Bar Association, 2008).

This paper examines related Articles of the Basic Law, legislatures and ordinances to understand how the separation of powers comes in to play in Hong Kong SAR and identifies the relations of the three powers while reviewing relevant cases that have impacted the system.

The concept of separation of powers had rooted in Hong Kong from its colonial past but it was not until July 1st, 1997 had the system been put into practice with a codified constitution that laid down the legal foundations. One of the most important general principles of the Basic Law is the authorization of the region to maintain a system of executive, legislative and independent judicial power (BL 2), which concept is very different from the centralized governing power of the mainland political system. The structure of the Basic Law provides for the clear separation of powers. Under Chapter IV, the provisions for political structure are divided into sections according to the governmental bodies, in which the institutions and power of the executive, legislative and judiciary branches are distinctively outlined.

Headed by the Chief Executive (BL 43), Government is the executive authority of the Hong Kong SAR (BL 59), while the Legislative Council is the legislature (BL 66) and the judicial power is exercised by the courts at all



Bibliography: arney, G. (1993, September 13). Separation of Powers in the Westminster System. AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP . Brisbane, Queensland: Parliamentary Education & Training Services, Queensland Parliament. Cheung, A. B. (2007). Executive-Led Governance or Executive Power 'Hollowed-Out '-The Political Quagmire of Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Political Science , 15 (1), 17-38. Ghai, Y. (1999). Hong Kong 's New Constitutional Order (2 ed.). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. Hong Kong Bar Association. (2008, July 9). Press Release. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from Hong Kong Bar Association: http://www.hkba.org/whatsnew/press-release/20080709.pdfHong Kong SARLegCo. (2004, September). LegCo Today. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.LegCo.gov.hk/english/index.htmJudiciary, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2004, October). Guide to Judicial Conduct. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. McInnis, A. (2007). The Legal System of the Hong Kong SAR. In D. K. Srivastava, Business Law in Hong Kong (2nd Edition ed., p. 19). Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia. Ng Ka Ling v. Director of Immigration (Court of Final Appeal April 1999). Weng, B. S. (2001). Judicial Independence under the Basic Law. In S. Tsang, Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law in Hong Kong (pp. 48-71). Hong Kong : Hong Kong University Press. Wesley-Smith, P. (1998). An Introduction to the Hong Kong Legal System. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press (China) Ltd. Wesley-Smith, P. (2004). Judges and Judicial Power Under the Hong Kong Basic Law. Hong Kong Law Journal (34), 83.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    One Country, Two Systems

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    FEI, L. (2009). Enforcement of Arbitral Awards between Hong Kong and Mainland China: A Successful Model?. Chinese Journal Of International Law, 8(3), 621-636.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When comparing the communist nation of China with the democratic nation of Australia many differences are apparent. The application of the legislative (law making and modifying function), executive (administrative function) and judiciary (law enforcing and dispute resolving function) is vastly different between the two nations as can see when we compare and contrast the underlying principles of each system of government. Firstly, both nations claim to uphold the concept of the rule of law, although due to corruptive forces surrounding the Chinese court system, this concept is often thwarted and equality before the law is not upheld. Within the constitutions of both nations the basic principles of separation of powers have been applied; however on examination of the practice of separation within the nations we find that convention (in the case of Australia) and the corruptive influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have not allowed such separation. Finally, the representation of the people by each nation’s governments will be compared through examining contrasting election and law making practices. With reference to the three arms of government, the comparisons made between the underlying principles of both China and Australia’s systems of government will support the understanding that democratic nations are a government of the people, by the people, for the people; making them just, whilst communist nations often struggle to provide the same justice and citizen involvement in their political process.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In every government there are three sorts of power; the legislative; the executive, in respect to things dependent on the law of nations; and the executive, in regard to things that depend on the civil law.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early Religious Wars

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Chapter 7: Separation of Powers (1997). Retrieved July 30, 2009, from SocIndex with Full text Database. (University Library).…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To ensure this limitation, the Australian Constitution expressly defines each government institution and provides for their operation within Chapters 1,2, and 3. The effect of this is that the Constitution explicitly enables checks and balances in order to prevent ‘absolutism’ or one institution prevailing over the others.41 Despite the Constitution’s explicit structure to reflect the separation of powers, in reality each form of government branch does coincide, therefore threatening the original intention to uphold the separation of powers imposed by the Constitution.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Seperation of Power

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This essay aims to examine the reasons for and why it is important to have a separation of powers, to examine the United Kingdom's constitution, assessing our somewhat unclear separation of powers, and discussing the reasons why we do not have a strict separation, taking into account the overlaps and relationships between each limb of Government and the checks and balances required for it to operate efficiently. The political doctrine of the Separation of Powers can be traced back to Aristotle, who states: "There are three elements in each constitution ..first, the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second the officials; and third, the judicial element." This highlights the three elementary functions that are required for the organisation of any state.…

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The ‘separation of powers’ is doctrine of the UK constitution first termed by Montesquieu, a French political philosopher, in his 1748 book De l 'esprit des lois (The Spirit of the Laws) he argues that there are three bodies of government – the executive, legislature and judiciary – which each have a discrete area of power with clear functions that no other body can imitate: this is true ‘separation of powers’. The purpose of which is to limit state power so that no element has an abuse of power hence protecting civil liberties. By Montesquieu’s definition, the separation of powers is incomplete as there is clear overlap between the different branches of government, notably the legislative and executive. Contrastingly, the revisionist definition of the separation of powers as, remarked by Lord Bingham, claims that while the doctrine of the separation of powers is weak by the terms of the classic characterisation, “the separation between the exercise of judicial powers on the one hand and legislative and executive powers on the other is total or effectively so” This convincing revaluation of the separation of powers principle indicates that under the new “partial” definition, the separation of powers is a clear, complete doctrine in the UK unwritten constitution.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay will seek to analyse the doctrine of the separation of powers and the importance of its presence within a constitution. Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying how this idea is incorporated into the United Kingdom’s (UK) constitution and the effect that recent developments of constitutional reform such as the introduction of the UK Supreme Court in place of the House of Lords has had.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The doctrine of separation of powers was perhaps most thoroughly explained by the French Jurist Montesquieu (1989), who based his analysis on the British Constitution of the early 18th century. This essay will discuss the doctrine of separation of powers, its meaning and importance within the United Kingdom’s un-codified constitution. It will analyse the relationship between the Executive, Legislature and the Judiciary and how the United Kingdom does not strictly adhere to the doctrine.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • The Hong Kong SAR shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People's Government, or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theoretically, checks and balance is essentially important between the Executive-Legislative branches in democratic regimes, it can prevent power dominate by either one branch which may result to “absolute power makes absolute corrupt and incompetent”-- Duke Clinton. However, the central government wants to assure the transition of Macau sovereignty from Portugal to China smooth and stable, and on the other hand, she also wants to develop a system that is convenient in monitoring Macau SAR government’s activities, and ensure Macau is running within the motherland’s state strategy. Therefore, the Basic Law of Macau has given more power to the Executive Branch than the Legislative Branch. This inclination of power provided by the Basic Law of Macau makes Macau SAR becoming an Executive-led government. In the following, we will discuss in detail about how the Basic Law shows Executive-led government.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The doctrine of the separation of powers is one extending back hundreds of years. It is a doctrine, which has had a significant impact on the Australian constitutional system, and is consequently reflected within it. However, this essay argues that the doctrine has, to a degree, been tempered by the recognition of responsible government, despite its obvious reflection in the Cth Constitution. This essay will also discuss the separation of judicial power principles as part of the overall doctrine, and the significant impact it has on limiting and regulation the role of the judiciary. The issues of an elected judiciary and of parliamentary privilege will also be discussed. The doctrine of the separation of powers is reflected in the Australian constitution law systems to a significant degree. This essay will focus on the Cth Constitutional system primarily, as this is where the operation of the doctrine is very clear.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article 16 of the Bill of Rights protects the freedom of opinion and expression of everyone. Also according to the Article 27 of the Basic Law, “Hong Kong residents shall have freedom of speech, of the press and of publication; freedom of association, of assembly, of procession and of demonstration; and the right and freedom to form and join trade unions, and to strike.” This means that the freedom of Hong Kong residents in doing the above acts should not be restricted. So, if a particular law offenses the freedom given by the Article 27 of the Basic Law, it contravenes with the Basic Law.…

    • 2225 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    officers, who theoretically represent power and authority in all of Hong Kong, neither of them…

    • 545 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is known as the separation of powers. The constitution divides commonwealth powers between three separate bodies as it is necessary in any legal system, for the government to exercise the functions of the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Each act as a check on the others, to ensure that there is no abuses of power and that constitutional authority is not exceeded. The aim of the separation of powers is to ensure that authority is evenly distributed between these three groups. The legislative function means that laws must be made, and the parliament is made up of representatives elected by the people. The administrative executive function consists of public service and cabinet. This power ensures that the laws are administered or executed. The judicial function is responsible for interpreting the law and when dispute arises. The court system, independent judges and magistrates exercise this power. The separation of powers is demonstrated in the case of the Australian communist party vs. the commonwealth of Australia in…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays