Preview

Critically Evaluate How the Situational Model of Leadership Can Be Used to Explain the Behaviour of Saddam Hussein

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2054 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critically Evaluate How the Situational Model of Leadership Can Be Used to Explain the Behaviour of Saddam Hussein
Introduction

Saddam Hussein was the President of Iraq from 1979 to 2003 and during his time in office was responsible for a tumultuous period in Iraqi history. For the purposes of analysis of his leadership style with respect to a Situational model, three areas of his career will be looked at separately; his rise to presidency from Vice-President, during the Iran-Iraq War and post invasion of Kuwait.
Situational model of leadership

A widely recognised situational model is the model developed by Hersey and Blanchard (1969) and the revised model by Blanchard et al. (1985) (Northhouse, 2007). The theory in outline states that one's leadership style should be dictated by the type of situation and the demands of the situation at hand. Thus, a good leader is one who can adapt their style appropriately to the situational demands.

Hersey and Blanchard characterized the situational leadership style in terms of the amount of the direction and the support that the leader provides to followers. The situational leadership styles they described fall into the following four types:

Telling Leaders: The telling leader defines the roles and tasks for each follower, and supervises them very closely. All important decisions are made by the leader and announced to the followers that means communication is predominantly one-way. These leaders tell others what to do.

Selling Leaders: The selling leader defines the rolls and the tasks of each follower, but also seeks ideas and suggestions from followers. Decisions are made predominantly by the leader, but the communication style used is two-way. These leaders are good at "selling" their ideas.

Participating Leaders: A participating leader passes along the day-to-day decisions such as dividing up the workload to the followers. The participating leader will help to facilitate discussion and takes part in the decision-making process, but ultimate control is with the follower.

Delegating Leaders: The



Bibliography: Cockburn, A., & Cockburn, P. (1999). Out of the Ashes:The Resurrection of Saddam Hussein. Perennial. Coughlin, C. (2002). Saddam:The Secret Life. London: Macmillan. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal Leadership:Realizing the power of Emotional Intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Karsh, E., & Rautsi, I. (1991). Saddam Hussein:A Political Biography. Futura Publications. Northhouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership:Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications. Post, J. M. (2006). The psychological assessment of political leaders : with profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton. The University of Michigan Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Leadership

    • 2151 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Mind Tools Ltd (2013) The Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory. Available at: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_44.htm. Date accessed 06/06/13…

    • 2151 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both contingency and situational theories are based on situational variables determine the leadership styles. Both say that no specific leadership style is best for all environments or certain decision making types. The success of the organization depends on the leadership style that fit the situation and abilities and traits of the group in the situation (Yuki, 2010).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of a leader is much like that of a clownfish and anemone. The leader benefits from the growth and development of their apprentice, by becoming more self aware and growing as a leader, while the follower receives important guidance through their progression. As much as one benefits…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Being a leader seems rather simple by definition. One that is followed by other is a leader. However, the trivial aspects are uncovered when you ask what makes followers follow a leader, how far are they willing to follow them, and does where the leader want to go a reason for the following?…

    • 2090 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Boyd, H. (2003). Iraq 's troubled history. The New York Amsterdam News, 94 (13), 4.…

    • 3428 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin, M. (2005). The Persian Gulf war: Saddam 's failed invasion. San Diego: Lucent Books.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ldr 711

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the assessment, “What is My Leadership Style?” my score leans toward a task-oriented style along with a situational approach. The foundation of situational leadership is the theory that there is not a style that is the best leadership. According to Hersey and Blanchard (1977), a leader believes his or her actions and styles depend on the situation at hand. A situational leader focuses on contextual factors in the work required (Clawson, 2006).…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Gulf War in 1990 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003 both had a profound impact not just on the countries directly involved - primarily Iraq and the United States (US) - but also on the geo-politics of the world. Arguably, the War ended in a stalemate because the Iraqi regime that had started the War by invading Kuwait remained in power. Perhaps inevitably then, in March 2003 the US and its allies invaded Iraq with the stated aim of overthrowing the regime of Saddam Hussein and destroying that regime's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). Some similarities between both Wars are immediately obvious: for example, the same country, the US, led both wars against the same country, Iraq. There are, however, significant differences between the Wars. Accordingly, this essay compares and contrasts some key aspects of the wars: their military aspects, the use and abuse of intelligence services, causes and outcomes, differences in media coverage, and the changing views of different Arab regimes. It argues that the military outcomes were very much the same and that western intelligence essentially continued to offer wrong advice and analyses; in contrast, the roles of the media diverged significantly between both wars as did the political outcomes and the views of Arab regimes. Overall, comparing and contrasting both Wars highlights their major impact on world politics and power, with their consequences playing a significant role in shaping today's contemporary world.…

    • 2925 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Learning Team Analysis

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Hersey ,P. & Blanchard, K. (1995). Situational leadership. . In J. Wren (Ed.) The leader’s…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Graedd, C. L. (1997, Summer). Evolution of situational leadership theory: A critical review. Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 153-170.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The presence of different internal and external forces that affect the operations within a company provides the manager with a chance to choose the best reaction to a situation. The use of the situational leadership theory as a response mechanism is quite appropriate because it offers new changes that adhere to different goals intended within an organization (Lambert, Marler, &Gueutal, 2008). The experiences gained during a specific period will determine how well the management can respond to biting issues within the company. The objective is to get the employees working towards their goals without failure; an issue that disturbs every manager across the world (Silverthorne, 2000).…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Situational Leadership Model was developed in the 1960s by Hersey and Blanchard to emphasize follower development. In this model, the leader analyzes the situation, considers the development level of the follower, and then adapts a task- or relationship-oriented style to suit him or her ("Hersey and Blanchard 's situational leadership,"…

    • 2245 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The best leaders use a composite of leadership styles that flex to the individual and the situation and have come to be defined as “situational leadership” by Ken Blanchard. With behavioral repetition usually one style asserts itself above the others. This brief exercise and simple tool looks to provide you with some insight into your dominant style and its potential strengths and shortcomings. None of the styles are necessarily better than another. Rather, the situation determines the most appropriate style. For a leader it is vital to learn new skills, develop existing ones and use knowledge coupled with experience so as to benefit colleagues and achieve the overall organizational objective(s). All three styles work best when the leader sees themselves as in the service of those they lead.…

    • 3022 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding Leadership

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Telling/Directing (S1) – Leaders tell their people what to do and how to do it.…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A leader can be anyone in a team that has the ability to influence others.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays