Preview

Critically Evaluate How and to What Extent Should Management Recognise Corporate Social Responsibility Extending Beyond the Boundaries of the Organisation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2849 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critically Evaluate How and to What Extent Should Management Recognise Corporate Social Responsibility Extending Beyond the Boundaries of the Organisation
Critically evaluate how and to what extent should management recognise corporate social responsibility extending beyond the boundaries of the organisation

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a wide ranging area of study. All companies have-

“Economic, social, ethical and environmental responsibilities, some of which require compliance with the law others requiring discretionary action to ensure that the company does not knowingly operate to the detriment of society” – McIntosh et al, 1998, Pg. 284

Social responsibility is an organisations responsibility towards those who are directly and indirectly affected by its activities. This means that firms don’t just have a responsibility and accountability to shareholders but society also.

In theory, society is built on a number of common social values and beliefs upheld by the majority. If society grants existence and protection to organisations they must be seen to ‘aligning their business operations with social values’.

There are 5 views of business ethics which are relevant to the case for and against CSR. The first view works off the rule that ‘Business is Business’ where only purely commercial aims are relevant, anything else comes second. This advocates Friedman’s view (illustrated overleaf) that the prime “responsibility of business is exclusively to maximise profit for shareholders”- McIntosh et al, 1998, Pg. xi.

Freidman’s Efficincy Perspective of Ethics Shareholders Hurt Shareholders Benefit

Mistakes
Managerially Responsible

Managerially Irresponsible
Managerially Responsible
Society
Hurt
Society
Benefits

The next two views are that the firm act consistently with the law and that good ethics means good business- this is the approach that appears to be taken by most businesses. The final two are based on morality- conventional reality being the morality of the moment and what is acceptable now, conventional wisdom cannot



References: Boatright, J.R. (2003) Ethics and the Conduct of Business, Prentice Hall. Hawkins, D.E. (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility, Palgrave Macmillan. Pg. xi, Pg. 76 McIntosh et al (1998) Corporate Citizenship, Pitman. Bradburn, R. (2001) Understanding Business Ethics, Continumm.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Est1 Task 1

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was stated in the introduction of this performance assessment on TaskStream that “Many believe that business entities should have an ethical duty to be socially responsible, to work towards increasing its positive effects on society while decreasing its negative effects” (TaskStream EST1, 2008). The attitude and actions carried out by Company Q are both unethical and socially irresponsible on multiple levels.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Ethics Outline

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crane, A; Matten, D; & Spence, L; (2007) Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ~ Companies engage in CSR in order to maintain a business on track to do the right thing. However, there's three reasons that keeps a business engage with CSR. Pragmatic, where the term "use power or loose it" is used , this mean that if businesses are not responsible certain advantages could be taken away. Ethical reason, is when businesses have a responsability to behave ethically, this mean that executives' duty is to care about multiple stakeholders. The last reason is the strategic one, which is based identifying activities that can harm the business.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tyco International as a whole was no different any other company in that it contained a chief executive officer (CEO) that wanted to achieve success. But at some point that success turned into greed. Dennis Kozlowski began working for Tyco in 1975 and was named the CEO in 1992. Kozlowski had a reputation for being aggressive in his field and during his tenure at Tyco was named one of the “Top 25 Managers of the Year” and became one of the highest-paid CEOs (Kaplan, 2009, p. 14). Along his rise to the top, Kozlowski became subjected to a lavish lifestyle of extravagant vacations, company jets and cars, and memberships. During this rise, he also treated himself to a “$31 million Fifth Avenue apartment, a vintage yacht, a Renoir, and a Monet” (Kaplan, 2009, p. 15). However, in 2002, Kozlowski’s world began to crumble around him. He was initially accused of tax evasion, but this accusation by the Manhattan district attorney led to a broader investigation into Kozlowski’s practices. As a result of this investigation, Kozlowski resigned as the CEO, was indicted for looting hundreds of millions of dollars, and was convicted on a range of felonies that led to an eight to 25 year sentence (Kaplan, 2009, p. 15).…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For my purpose here, I would like to examine the case for which the two views of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are positioned in. One of these viewpoints is that CSR is practiced ethically in businesses simply because it is the right thing to do, through being moral and just by following a Values-based management system. The other perspective on CSR is that it is simply a ‘do-gooder’ ploy, and that it is only practiced within firms to impress society and those around them.…

    • 2731 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Csr and Stakeholders

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Businesses have clearly identified this responsibility and have started taking up the challenge to legitimate its practices to society at large. This in the last decade has been commonly referred to as Corporate Social Responsibility – CSR (Crane, A., Matten, D., Spence, L. 2008). As Carroll (1979, cited in Carroll, 1991) states that, CSR included the idea that the corporation has not only economic and legal obligations, but ethical and discretionary (philanthropic) responsibilities as well.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business ethics dictates a set of standard principles and values that should be taken into account in a company’s everyday activities. It is composed of both written and unwritten codes of moral standards that are crucial to the current and future activities of a business organization. It addresses issues within a company such as the misuse of company resources, accounting fraud, defective products, bribery, conflicts of interests, etc.…

    • 3383 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the framework proposed by Carroll (1991) to provide managers with a way to evaluate their duties to the myriad groups with interests in their organizations. These groups are defined as stakeholders and include owners, customers, employees, the community, competitors, suppliers, social activist groups, the public and potentially others. According to Carroll (1991), the framework of CSR can be divided into four parts encompassing “the entire spectrum of business obligations”; these include economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic responsibilities. The hierarchical structure of CSR consists of a pyramid encompassing these principles with the most critical concept, economics, forming the foundation. Economic responsibilities are considered…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is growing recognition of the significant effect the activities of the private sector have—on employees, customers, communities, the environment, competitors, business partners, investors, shareholders, governments and others. It is also becoming increasingly clear that firms can contribute to their own wealth and to overall societal wealth by considering the effect they have on the world at large when making decisions. Business opinion polls and corporate behaviour both show increased levels of understanding of the link between responsible business and good business. Also, investors and financial markets are beginning to see that CSR activities that integrate broader societal concerns into business strategy and performance are evidence of good management. In addition to building trust with the community and giving firms an edge in attracting good customers and employees, acting responsibly towards workers and others in society can help build value for firms and their shareholders.…

    • 2369 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Study Report, Mauritius, 2004, Unpublished). Different segments of the population get involved in corruption, the focus…

    • 4980 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Businesses serve society and, in doing so, interact with other persons. Thus they are also a part of society and their interactive behaviour, just like that of humans, is governed by entitlements and responsibilities. When these entitlements and responsibilities are recognised and understood by persons on their own and given effect to, through voluntary behaviour, we say the persons are guided by ethics. However, there are times when persons may not be guided by ethics, or where, ethics notwithstanding, rights and duties are to be determined. For such times, when entitlements and responsibilities are to be laid down and enforced by authority, we have laws.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics and Communication

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are different areas of ethics, when it comes to organisations, business ethics must be taken into account. They can be both ‘Normative’ and ‘Descriptive’.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many organisations criticise CSR because they don't see business delivering on its promises. However, the problem isn't simply that companies aren't practicing CSR very well, it's that the corporate structure is not capable of social responsibility. Corporations aren't just greedy, the only concern they can have is to concentrate wealth in the hands of their shareholders (Bakan, 2004). Through CSR companies trumpet their 'values', but a company can only have one value: its share-price. Economist Milton Friedman says that because a company is the property of its shareholders, CSR can only be insincere (Bakan, 2004). In other words, companies can only make a decision which favours the wider social good if the outcome is also the most profitable one.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most important points on CSR has found in Friedman’s article is that a business’s responsibility is to get as much profit as possible without against the law and ethic custom (Friedman, 1970). There are several arguments about CSR which support Friedman’s points. First, manager’ obligation is to expend shareholders or owners wealthy thus he is representative of shareholders and owners. That is to say, Shareholders and owners should take control of their possession which is considered as their ethical right as they invested the business. The ethical right creates responsibility of directors of their organization which is to maintain and increase shareholders’ wealthy. It is irresponsible if manger spends shareholders’ money without their permission. But if the manager spends money in a way that shareholders would have spent it, he imposes tax. Second, when firms are trying to focus on their own interests, they can eventually lead to the best interests to whole society. “Lacking profit for extended periods, a firm’s funds (and funding sources) can dry up very quickly, leaving the firm unable to conduct business.”(Ahlstrom as cited in Globerman, 2011, p. 512). When companies lack of money to do business, lack of money to employ people, how could they contribute to society. It intelligibly describes Friedman’s position. Thirdly, government officials should make social decisions instead of directors who work for an enterprise. For example,…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Shaw, W (2010). Business Ethics, A Textbook With Cases, Chapter 4, Part Two The Nature of…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays