Preview

Critical Response Essay On Rhetorical Precis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
863 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critical Response Essay On Rhetorical Precis
RHET 120 Goss Essay #1
Critical response Essay

Student name
2/6/2014

Rhetoric is the art of discourse. In some specific situations, it is an art to improve the capability of writers or speakers expression. It could help people to reach the purpose of inform, persuade, and motivate with the particular audiences. As a significant subject of formal study, rhetoric has played a crucial role in the Western tradition in the past many decades. There are two famous people—Plato and Aristotle that have made huge contributions on developing Rhetoric and delivering the concept of rhetoric from different perspectives. As comparing the view of Aristotle and Plato on rhetoric, it obvious that Aristotle builds on Plato’s views to some extent;
…show more content…
According to his point of view, rhetoric is defined as the ability to see what is possible persuasive in very given case. Of course, the definition as such may not be able to apply to all circumstances. Rather, he is in the situation which is similar to physician. He would not be able to convince everyone if he finds out the available means of convincing. Aristotle joins Plato in criticizing contemporary manuals of rhetoric. In Aristotle’s view, people are most strongly convinced when they suppose that something has been proven, there is no need for the orator to confuse or distract the audience by the use of emotional appeals and so on. There is no unbridgeable gap between the commonly-held opinions and what is true. The core of Aristotle's Rhetoric is the doctrine that there are three technical means of …show more content…
Both philosophers are concerned with the artist’s ability to have significant impact on others. Both philosophers hold radically different notions of reality. As a result, Plato is antagonistic towards the function of rhetoric in his dialogue Gorgias and ambivalent. Similar to Aristotle, Plato is concerned with the pursuit of truth. Nevertheless, in Plato’s dialogues he views rhetoric as a way to misrepresent truth as he states in his criticism of the sophists.
On the other hand, Aristotle views Rhetoric as both a means to find truth on par with dialectics and an effective method of communication. Through the perspective from Aristotle, he is not as considered with rhetoric being a method of metaphor or a particular way of persuade through language tricks. As he relies on conviction to establish probability, he believes that truth is not just a matter of certainty. However, Plato insists on truth being a matter of certainty which could be disguised fairly easy by rhetorical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle used the term logos to refer to logical appeals, pathos to refer to emotional appeals, and ethos to refer to credibility. With these, he created classical and traditional rhetoric theories. He believed that in a perfect world logic alone would be enough to persuade, however he also acknowledged that in the real world, effective arguments depend on both logical and emotional appeals that have to be given by a writer/speaker with good established credibility. He also named intelligence, character, and goodwill as attributes that produce credibility.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Webster Dictionary, rhetoric is defined as the art of speaking or writing effectively. Rhetoric is made up of three separate appeals that can be used individually or collectively in an attempt to persuade a reader. Ethos is the credibility and qualifications of the speaker or author. Pathos is the author's use of emotions and sympathy to urge the audience to agree with his or her standpoint. And lastly, logos is applying sound reasoning (logic) to attract the typical ideas of the audience and to prove the author's point of view. "Lockdown" by Evans D. Hopkins is a fine example of an author using these appeals to persuade his audience. Hopkins uses of the three…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle was a Greece philosopher lived from 384BC to 322BC. He wrote and taught many subjects in his career. One of his incredible writings included Rhetoric. Rhetoric is the art used to persuade or motivate an audience. Persuasion is an art used as a tool to change people’s belief, behavior, or even there attitude towards certain things. The Greece philosophers believed that to be truly effective to the audience you had to use a motivational way. The three ways Aristotle covered in Rhetoric subject was Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric is the art of influence, and therefore hinders the strong social force of arguments. According to the book, Thanks for Arguing, rhetoric serves as the decoder for arguments. The art of persuasion is all around, even in arguments.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle, although having lived thousands of years ago, continues to make an impact in our society with his contribution to Western thinking and his famous "art" of rhetoric. He remains to this day, one of the most influential philosophers in the history of rhetorical study. One of his most prominent works is his "Rhetoric", a book that "confronts scholars with several perplexing questions" (Herrick 74). "Rhetoric" is divided into three books that discuss the "domains of rhetoric, the rhetorical proofs that Aristotle is so famous for and matters of style and arrangement" (Herrick 74). One of the most important contributions of Aristotle 's "Rhetoric" is his idea of artistic proofs, which are used to persuade an audience. Since developed in the fourth century BC, these proofs still continue to be utilized by rhetoricians to this day through the Aristotelian method. There are three components that comprise the artistic proofs. These are "(1) logical reasoning (logos), (2) the names and causes of various human emotions (pathos), and (3) human character and goodness (ethos)" (Herrick 82). Although all parts of his work are instrumental to rhetoricians and scholars everywhere, I will focus on the profound impact of Aristotle 's "artistic proofs" to the art of rhetoric and use Franklin D. Roosevelt 's December 8, 1941 "Declaration of War" speech as an example of how they 're put into practice as a persuasive mechanism in today 's postmodern society.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper analyzed two articles from different fields of studies, then compared and contrasted them for rhetorical elements. One from the field of criminal justice and the other from the field of psychology. The criminal justice article, “DA Vance: Tyrone Howard Convicted of Murdering NYPD Detective Randolph Holder” was produced by The New York District Attorney’s office (2017). In this article the authors mentions a press release about a man murdering a NYPD detective and how the man lead up to that murder. The other article from psychology, “Personality and Social Psychology: Crossing Boundaries and Integrating Perspectives” was created by two psychologists, Snyder and Deaux (2007). These article mentions the differences and similarities…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dialectic Vs Rhetoric

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page

    One more prominent figure in the classical history of rhetoric is Plato (428-347 B.C). Plato believed that the purpose of philosophy was to discover truth that should be independent of any special calculation of interest; he was suspicious of rhetoric because he thought it lacked any concern with a truth that was separate from the speaker’s interest. An opposition therefore developed in the classical period between rhetoric and dialectic (1), dialectic gave equal weight to both sides of an argument, while rhetoric was concerned with persuasion from a particular perspective rather than presenting a balanced point of view. For Plato, rhetoric was deceptive, because it only showed a perspective that fitted with the speaker’s point of view.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Paper

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rhetorical strategy is a type of method for writers to manipulate their writing to purpose an idea or influence the reader. Narration, description, and exemplification are some of the rhetorical appeals writer use to grab the reader’s attention. And invoke strong reaction out of the reader. Apart from these strategies, many writers use Aristotle's appeals of Logos, Ethos, and Pathos to persuade the reader. Logos is an appeal to the audience's logic and reason. Pathos is an appeal to the audience’s sentiments and emotions. Ethos is an appeal to the authority or reputation of the speaker. Logos is an appeal to the audience's logic and reason. In my rhetorical analysis, I will be analyzing an article by Heather Mattern called, “Learning to Breathe”. In this article, Mattern proposes increasing physical activity such as running, , consuming raw foods, and adopting a positive mentality to curb depression. Mattern’s article brings awareness to health educators, like myself, who focuses on the study of health related issues like food, nutrition, and prevention. Through the use of use pathos and logos appeals, as well as narration, classifying and diving, and exemplifications to do what?…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric is the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing. This is especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques. There are also many rhetoric elements to this story. I will explain just a few of the many rhetoric elements in this essay.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis: “A Prostitute, a Servant, and a Customer Service Representative: a Latina in Academia.”…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 772 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author Sara Mosle reminds her readers right away about an emotional massacre that took place in Newtown, Connecticut. In her article in The New York Times called, “Preparing Students for a Newtown-like disaster” she argues her point against Louie Gohmert, the Texas Congressman who suggested that all teachers should have guns. Sara has a lot of credibility for her personal thoughts and what she believes is true about the gun laws. She is aiming this article at adults, parents, and people who vote. She is trying to change people’s mind about the gun laws. Using very good examples she shows the readers to not figure out ways to hide from the gunmen or to fight back against the gunmen but to just get rid of the amount of guns given to people not qualified to have them.…

    • 772 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle once defined rhetoric as “an ability, in each particular case, to see the means of persuasion” or in a simpler term, “persuasion.” The use of rhetoric dates back centuries all the way to ancient Greece. Rhetoric is simply used for everyday communication. It can be defined by three concepts: Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. Logos, Ethos and Pathos is explained in simpler terms as text, author, and audience. These concepts are the back bone of modern day rhetoric and are used to strengthen a rhetorical situation or argument. Rhetoric in turn fuels the concept of critical thinking or analyzing that are useful tools to help determine the validity and soundness of Rhetorical situations. In a glance, critical thinking is the act of identifying…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the 1992 speech by Mary Fisher titled “A Whisper of AIDS” she speaks to not only the people attending the 1992 Republican National Convention, but the world and all who can listen to her speak. She speaks of a condition known as “AIDS” (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) that springs from the origin HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) and is the cause of thousands of deaths every year. She uses pathos to persuade her audience that AIDS is a concern in our nation by using the emotions fear, anxiety, and sympathy. She uses anxiety and fear interchangeably, making her argument strong; all the while, she talks to her young sons directly to spark a resilient sympathy from her audience. The speaker is HIV positive herself and uses that to make the audience sympathize with her. She is an ordinary wife and mother that appeals to those who are in denial they’re at risk. AIDS is a disease that is lurking quietly at our doorstep.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The RA was a challenging task for me because I felt the instructions were unclear, I did not really understand the task. I felt the purpose was really loose and there were no specifications or key points to follow. When I started this projected I started a week ahead in hopes to end early or use the additional time to solidify my essay. However, I found myself struggle to finish barely on time because I kept starting over and over, it was not until the third time I rewrote it that I was satisfied with where I was going. I would say that the lack of clarity made my rhetorical analysis essay one of my weakest performance this quarter. Nevertheless, I used my mistakes in my rhetorical analysis essay as a guideline, I made sure I that I would repeat…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald Trump Rhetoric

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Famous philosopher and poet, Aristotle, once described, “[rhetoric] may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion. This is not a function of any other art.” Thus, rhetoric is a form of clear, perceptible language which leads its observers to make a specific and calculated conclusion. Many consider politicians to be the most avid users of rhetoric, constantly trying to convince audiences to vote or certain way or to shift the national political agenda in a direction that fits their means. In many cases, politicians are accused of being liars or untruthful for doing so. Contrary, others consider politicians to be masters of languages, constantly formulating methods to make their arguments more…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics