Tawatha Phillips
Everest University
CJE 1600
Criminal Investigations
Professor Stevie Hayes
January 12, 2013
Why is non-verbal communication important when testifying before a jury, and what suggestions do you have for helping a testifying officer make a positive impression on a jury? Jurors are selected by the judge, prosecution and the defending attorney. The judge will provide the list of potential jurors to both the prosecution and the defending attorney for the selection process to participate in the trial case. For either the prosecutor or the defending attorney jury selecting a jury is normally very similar in its process. The selection of the jurors is completed after the trial initiation and the arraignment and plea. The Sixth Amendment provides the any American citizen the right to an impartial jury (Hess Orthmann & Hess, 2013). The process both the prosecution and the defending attorney use to select a juror is called “voir dire” (the preliminary examination of a witness or juror to determine his or her competency to give or hear evidence). These people are questioned by both the prosecutor and the defense attorney. During this process the potential jurors are questioned about a number of things, from their religious practices to things that have happened to them. The reason for these open ended questions is to see if the juror will be biased against the accused, or may have beliefs that will harm a case (Hill, 2005)(Hess Orthmann & Hess, 2013). Both the prosecution and the defending attorney utilize some common tactics and potential jury processing techniques. Both parties study their case and establish a tactics to confront the potential jurist with. They may even hire a Philologist with jury selection specialty training to assist their jury selection. First is the belief and attitude examination of the juror (Hess Orthmann & Hess, 2013).
References
Hess Orthmann, C. H., & Hess, K. M. (2013). Criminal Investigation (10th Ed). Clifton Park,
NY: Cengage Publishing. Business Law. Anti Essays. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from the World Wide Web: http://www.antiessays.com/free-essays/222945.html
References: Hess Orthmann, C. H., & Hess, K. M. (2013). Criminal Investigation (10th Ed). Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Publishing. Business Law. Anti Essays. Retrieved January 12, 2013, from the World Wide Web: http://www.antiessays.com/free-essays/222945.html
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Juries don’t have to provide any reasoning, making it exceedingly tough to distinguish whether juries have truly understood the evidence in order to acquire a just verdict. Monitoring a juror’s attitude and how seriously they are taking their duty is also, in essence, unachievable due to the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The act states it is inadmissible of the court “to obtain, solicit or disclose any statements made, opinions expressed, arguments advanced or votes cast” (Dodd, 2012). Consequently, section 8 makes any justifiable investigation into jury deliberation very…
- 1319 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Prosecutors are not supposed to select certain gender, race or age for the jury selection. The important for the plaintiff and the defendant is to have jurors who are not in favor of any involved parties. In cases were a lawsuit involves significant amount of money, the voir dire has become extra complicated over time, so now attorneys use skilled jury selection services to help them pick analytical data to select the perfect jurors. Attorneys think with the option of selecting professional jurors can help their clients win cases. Critics complain, this special jury selection services provide an unfair help to the other party, who cannot afford the cost of the…
- 297 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
age, gender , or simply by looks. The author really emphasizes the idea that some cases are decided by looks by including Juror number 3,…
- 128 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
2. The Twelve jurors are given the job, by the judge, of deciding whether a teenage boy is innocent or guilty of killing his father. They must separate the facts from the fancy and provide a verdict of guilty if there is no reasonable doubt to the claims, or non-guilty if there is reasonable doubt. The decision must be unanimous. The charge against the defendant is Murder in the first degree – premeditated homicide (death sentence).…
- 1553 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This is why the film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried because they don't check into the juror members enough which can lead to a very unfair jury…
- 521 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There is a thing known as a jury trial process that is supposed to happen in every jury trial case. Although, not followed perfectly in the jury trial of Carl Lee it is followed pretty well for a movie. The jury trial process is as follows; a crime is commited, an investigation is conducted, a warrant is issued, then the arrest is made, once arrested the criminal is booked, then they have their bail hearing. Following the bail hearing the preliminary arraignment happens these are when the informal charges are presented, after that comes the preliminary hearing this is where the court reviews the evidence to make sure there is enough evidence for a case to occur. If there is enough evidence they move on to the formal indictment where the…
- 1632 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
References: Anderson, T. M., & Gardner, T. J. (2013). Criminal Evidence 8th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.…
- 625 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
| In a jury trial, the judge would decide questions of _______and the jury would decide questions of ________.Answer…
- 523 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Juries represent the ordinary public and therefore are more likely to judge in line with generally accepted values of the society. Justice and equity are the standards of an eligible jury, and the jury selection is meant to ensure “counterbalancing of biases” or canceling out individual biases (Hastie, Penrod & Pennington, 1983). However, jury trials are often vulnerable to the effects of prejudice and stereotypes of the jury, by geographical or historical factors, and it tend to be harmful to certain groups. For example, juror characteristics, such as gender, religion, education level, socio-economic status (Hastie et al., 1983; Wrighstman, Kassim & Willis, 1987), and racial prejudices (Urszbat, 2005). And attorneys’ intonation, posture, attractiveness, confidence, and credibility also affect juries’ perception and their judgments (Jakubaszek, 2014). Most significant, the characteristics of defendants like gender and age would affect jury decision making (Pazzulo, Dempsey, Meader & Allen, 2010). These prejudices and stereotypes cause in-group-out-group bias during the trial process. In-group bias means in-group favoritism that refers to the fact that under certain conditions people will preference and have an affinity for one’s in-group over the out-group, or anyone viewed as outside the in-group. It is usually expressed in one 's evaluation of others, linking, allocation of resources and many other ways (Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. D., 2009). And out-group bias is the phenomenon in which an out-group is perceived as being threatening to the members of an in-group ( Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H., 2002) defined as out-group derogation. It is a matter of favoritism towards an in-group and the absence of equivalent favoritism towards an out-group (Brewers, Marilynn B., 1999). Outgroup derogation often…
- 1936 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Juries are considered to encompass a fundamental role of the criminal justice system, however , there are setbacks regarding their role in determining whether the accused is guilty or innocent. Juries are a representation of public confidence, as the right to be tried by peers has people confident that their impartiality and fairness does improve access to justice. Impartiality of the jury is supported by the process of random selection which usually result in a cross-section of society, therefore prejudices are…
- 668 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Many may think that by watching tv shows like, Judge Judy, are an easy way to learn how the court system works. However, there is much information that can be gained from serving on a jury. For example, there are two types of trials, criminal and civil. A criminal trial is a trial held when an individual has been accused of committing a crime that is against society. A jury held in a criminal case is made up of 12 people who work together to make a unanimous decision of “guilty or not guilty” and the government must prove that the crime was committed “beyond a reasonable doubt.” A civil trial jury is a jury made up of at least six people who come up with a decision based on proof that is “more true than not.” There are also three different types of juries. A grand jury, a petit jury, and a civil jury. Needless to say, it is actually the jury that makes a decision rather than the…
- 996 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the criminal justice system the individuals are spoken to by two different yet similarly imperative gatherings. These gatherings incorporate the police who research the wrongdoing and the head prosecutors who arraign the wrongdoers. At the point when there is a trial, a specific number of people are called into the witness of the court which are known as the jury. It is not just the right and obligation of juries to judge the realities, additionally what is the law. To at last focus a decision, the jury must look into all data in addition to the ethical goal of the blamed In the lawful equity framework for the United States, there are numerous of benefits , for example, being on the jury.…
- 552 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The jury pool is initially chosen from among the community utilizing a random strategy. Jury records are gathered from voter enlistments and driver permit/state id. From these records, some people are mailed. They will be addressed in court by the judge and/or lawyers in the U.S. According to Shari Seidman, in some cases such as capital punishment, the jury must be death qualified. Jury procedures are taught in law institutions to law students. The jury chose is said to have been…
- 872 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Jury Selection. To start the process of jury selection, a group of ordinary citizens are summoned to the courtroom by way of a juror summons that he or she has received in the mail. Once in the courtroom each juror must go through a process called voir dire. Voir dire is a questions and answers session that is facilitated by both the prosecutor and defense attorney along with the judge. This process is done to see if any of the potential jurors are biased or have been predisposed by anyone or prior information the potential jurors may have heard about the case. After the jury has been selected, the case is ready to go to trial.…
- 956 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays