Preview

Courts Real vs Fiction

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Courts Real vs Fiction
Reality and Fiction: the True View 1 Reality and Fiction: the True View Americans rely a great deal on their entertainment to educate them about life. In many ways Americans live vicariously through the experiences of fictional characters and believe themselves to learn many things from fictional characters. For example, many persons have said they learned CPR by watching medical shows on television or believe they can assist in a medical emergency because they have seen “experts” on television handle similar situations.
This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse or create simply to meet the needs of the fiction or make a specific point. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, unfortunately, people often only have fictional accounts of the law to educate them. The result, unfortunately, is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that interact with them. One of the main differences between fictional portrayals of the court process and real court processes is how the trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision (CA). Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought in to make statements (CA). Only rarely in that process will anything exciting happen. If one were to believe the portrayal of the trial sequence, however, seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as My Cousin Vinny or To Kill a Mockingbird, although one is a comedy and one a drama, represent trials as a place where shocking facts are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in trial outcomes.
Perry Mason and



References: American Bar Association. (2004). Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://www.abanet.org/cpr/mrpc/preamble.html Gibson, J.L Judicial Counsel of California. (NA). Jury Info: Trial Process. Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/jury/step2.htm The Judicial Process at Work Nossiter, A. (1996). Goetz Verdict Clears Injured Son, Mother Says. The New York Times , April 25, 1996. Retrieved September 4, 2008, from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9804EEDF1639F936A15757C0A960958 260 Pennsylvania Bar Association. (2004). Why Shouldn’t You Try to Handle Your Own Legal Affairs? Retrieved September 5, 2008, from http://www.pabar.org/pdf/howlawyerhelp.pdf Steinberg, H.M

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specially, the unequal playing field legal actors and the accused are playing on when it comes to the truths about how they perceive, think and behave. As seen in previous chapters, money and race play a big role in the way individuals are tried, and these wealthy individuals are exploiting the weakness in our legal system. Adam Benforado suggest that this way, “If you are rich and connected, you go free. If you are poor and uneducated, you go to prison.” Will only add to the massive unfairness in our justice system. Accordingly, the use of trial consultants has also proved to be a negative for our justice system. Trial consultants collect information on the potential jury pool, discover any correlations that exist, and then target a sympathetic…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are fiction stories always based on imagination? Or does it come from someone’s reality? Have you ever asked yourself why people read fiction stories? Either told through movies or books, fiction stories are ways people find to escape from their reality. However, most of the fiction stories come from people’s life, or are based in a real fact in order to be credible. In some ways, the truth must be distorted to be understandable, because sometimes it can be too complex to be explained. Both Reading Lolita in Tehran, by Azar Nafisi, and How To Tell a True Story, by Tim O’Brien, attempt to discover the truth even if it was exemplified by fiction, however, the searches were for different environments, gender, circumstances, and purposes.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Model Rule 5.5(B)- Attorney Howe, left a new hire, Carl, unattended, while also suggesting that he may conduct interviews in his office without specifying particulars regarding his presence or direct supervisory responsibilities. In hindsight, Attorney Howe could be indirectly contributing to the unauthorized practice of law due to his gross negligence to supervise his paralegal.…

    • 2220 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse, muddle or simply make-up to meet the needs of their fictional account. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, people often only have these fantastic accounts of the law to educate them to how it works “in the real world”. Consequently, the result is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that comprise our system. One of the main differences between fictional depictions of the court process and real thing is how a trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision. Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought forth to make statements. It is only rarely during these proceedings that anything exciting actually happens. But, if one were to believe the portrayal in movies and on television, it seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as “Sleepers” or “To Kill a Mockingbird”, make it seem as if shocking facts are revealed, surprise witnesses are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in every trial outcome. This simply…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jury Annotated Bibliography

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages

    "Analysis of the Media 's Influence on the Jury." Justice for America. N.p., 2 Nov. 2007. Web. 2…

    • 2432 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Duke Lacrosse Scandal

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Middleton, M. (1982). Should judges blow the whistle on lawyers? American Bar Association Journal, 68(10), 1207.…

    • 3838 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rose shows that in Twelve Angry Men it is difficult to reach a verdict when jurors essentially have pre conceived ideas and bring personal prejudice in a case, along with Jurors that lack interest. These factors undoubtedly cause conflict and difficulty in the Jury system, which highlights a potential weakness in the democratic process. The trouble also arises from the fact that Juror 8 is one of the few Jurors to initially deliberate honestly and thoughtfully and seeks to obtain justice. Rose suggests that there needs to be active participation In ensuring the jury system operates as intended, and when there is, the final verdict is easier to achieve.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent of the problem concerning the wrongfully convictions by jurors seems to lie within several areas. First, once a crime has been committed, the public outcry demands justice; therefore, there is a sense of urgency to quickly resolve the crime. As a result, the system may circumvent some procedures; thereby convicting the wrong individual. Secondly, while the nation has gotten better in the area of race relations, the amount of prejudice has not diminished; therefore, black on white criminal proceedings still affects an enormous amount of the nation’s population as we. Thirdly, the media coverage has an even bigger impact on an individual’s perception of the wrongfully convicted, because most Americans are not afforded the opportunity to be present for the investigative proceedings involved in criminal proceedings. As a result, we tend to rely on the media’s coverage and distorted view points as the main source of information we receive. Fourthly, with the invent of DNA testing some individuals have been released or exonerated through the use of this specialized testing method; however, most individuals cannot afford the amount of legal fees associated therein. Moreover, those individuals that are granted new hearings, or are exonerated using this procedure, have been assisted by groups such as the Innocent Project. Fifthly, the communities from which these individuals were wrongly convicted may still harbor ill feelings regarding their exoneration, which means while the court may exonerate them of all charges, the court of public opinion stills finds them to be guilty (Tyler and Vartkessina, 2012). Finally, even though some individuals have their cases dismissed through legal proceedings within the court system, their records still have to be expunged, which requires the assistance of an attorney, and the fees associated thereof (Roberts, 2003).…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reality In T. V Court

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page

    So lets separate reality from fiction in T.V. court shows or movies. Its expected mas drama and suspense with lots of surprisingly events. In many cases, just like with federal and also in the state level, we don’t usually convict judges, but judges usually are stating, “Over Rule” to an objection or “Sustain.” There is a movie called “The Judge” with great actors from Robert Duval (Joseph Palmer) as the judge from Indiana and Robert Downey Jr. (Hank) is the son a defense attorney while Billy Bob Thornton (Dwight Dickham) is the prosecutor looking to prosecute “The Judge” for first-degree murder. In real life Judges, attorneys, victims and offenders all go through a stage or stages of stress. During the case of “The Judge” Hank is interrogating…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts and Law

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 16, 2012, I observed a court hearing of 14 cases. Some of these cases dealt with people who committed crimes such as aggravated assault, Acc involving Death/ Injury, Terroristic threats, Retail theft, conspiracy theft, Resist Arrest/Other Law Enforce and Knowing/ in Mftr/Dist of Design Drug.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The New Jim Crow

    • 2225 Words
    • 7 Pages

    " We may think we know how the criminal justice system works. Television is overloaded with fictional dramas about police, crime, and prosecutors­ shows such as Law & Order. These fictional dramas, like the evening news, tend to focus on individual stories of crime, victimization, and punishment, and the stories are…

    • 2225 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pre Trial Process

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After a suspect is arrested and officially charged with a crime, he or she becomes a criminal defendant (Zalman, 2008). This step is significant in the criminal justice process because it brings several new sets of rules into play related to the defendant’s trial. Before a criminal defendant can be tried however, a number of milestones must be met and several obligatory processes must be completed. These procedures are designed to ensure that a fair trial takes place (Zalman, 2008). As criminal justice professionals must work in the medium of truth in their day to day activities in order to maintain their ethical and professional integrity, understanding the pre trial process is vital.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American justice system is one of the greatest aspects of the U.S. Constitution. The judicial branch insures that anyone in America receives a fair trial, that a nobody is incarcerated without due process and significant evidence, it assumes innocents until proven guilt, and protects the rights of citizens, victims, and the accused. The American justice system works most of the time, in that criminals normally go to jail while innocent people are set free; however, every system has its faults. Foremost, there is much debate over the concept of “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Many argue that courts do not always prove guilt or innocence, as in many people who are guilty of their crimes are not convicted because there was not enough evidence. The concept of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ is subjective and left up to the standards of the jurors. In today’s society, if a case does not have physical evidence, but strong circumstantial evidence and eyewitness accounts (evidence that was often deemed enough to convict several decades ago), the jury still may not convict because they have the idea that their should be some type of physical evidence for the person to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Often times, the idea of true guilt is lost in trying to prove ‘beyond a reasonable doubt.’…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sause, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney for Baltimore City, invited himself and seven other lawyers to attend a very exclusive luncheon at the Merchants’ Club for the purpose of discussing the formation of a “law club.” The seven invitees were F. Hooper Bank, Charles Cahn, II, P. McEvoy Cromwell, Joseph G. Finnerty, Jr., Robert J. Martineau, Shale D. Stiller, and H. Rutherford Turnbull, III. The date of the luncheon was January 12, 1961.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays